The reorganization of the faculty of law, which is making steady progress behind the highlighted “campus disputes, ” has been liable to be overlooked, It is chiefly because a mention of the “university problem” is immediately interpreted by the juristic way of thinking as the problem concerning univesity management, namely the problem of “university autonmy.” This kind of view on the faculty of law, mainly held by jurists, brings forth the pride that the faculty of law hoists a flag of university autonmy and that it pursues its own free, academic development, being quite free from the “social demand” of the state, namely of the monpolistic capital; or in other words, the so-called “cooperation between the industry and university” or “manpower-policy.”
This view seems to be too optimistic. A reform or reorganization plan now on the tapis which demands “rational reorganization” of the universities claims to be applicable to the faculty of law as well as other faculties in the university. In order to have a view on the “future” of the faculty of law, we must have a correct knowledge of its “past” and “present, ” and this may be only possible by the study of sociology of law on the faculty of law, which is the study far surpassing the narrow juristical view.
Based on the above viewpoint, the discussion in this thesis includes the following points.
抄録全体を表示