This article mainly argues about the interpretation of "_??__??__??_" in Art. 17 of the T'ang-lü;"_??__??__??__??__??_._??__??__??__??__??_(_??__??__??_, _??__??_, _??__??_)_??_, _??__??__??__??__??_."
"_??__??__??_" is, in the popular view, interpreted as the position with the highest kuan-p'ing (_??__??_) of the three positions.
This interpretation, however, can give no reasonable explanation for the following case; the case where a chih-shih-kuan (_??__??__??_) has a. kao-shen (_??__??_) of the wei-kuan (_??__??_) with a kuan-p'ing which is higher in the grade than the kuan-p'ing to his going position the chih shih-kuan. According to it, an unreasonable situation is consequently caused which the kao-shen of the chih-shih-kuan remains kept to him without being deprived, with the deprived kao-shen of the wei-kuan for the atonement for his committed crime(_??__??_).
This arises from depending on the grade of the kuan-p'ing to the each position in interpreting of "_??__??__??_". To prevent the arise of unreasonabiness like this from the interpretation of Art, 17 of T'ang-lü. I propose a reinterpretation which "_??__??__??_" is to be interpreted as the most valuable kao-shen of all on the point of the exposure of his committing of crime.
抄録全体を表示