詳細検索結果
以下の条件での結果を表示する: 検索条件を変更
クエリ検索: "浜寺公園駅"
6件中 1-6の結果を表示しています
  • 全国の登録有形文化財駅舎に関する研究(その2)
    大内田 史郎
    日本建築学会計画系論文集
    2020年 85 巻 771 号 1141-1148
    発行日: 2020年
    公開日: 2020/05/30
    ジャーナル フリー

     In Japan, these days, social demand for the preservation and conservation of station buildings is growing. There are even examples of entire railway lines being registered as a network of cultural properties that includes station buildings and other related facilities as well, an approach that applies to advantage the character of a railway line. Meanwhile, registering station buildings as tangible cultural properties is also viewed as a regional opportunity. Expectations are high that more of these station buildings able to become symbols and tourism resources that contribute to regional activation will be preserved and conserved, for the sake of Japan’s regional vitalization, hereafter.

     Amid this social environment, this study specifically examines station buildings registered as tangible cultural properties throughout Japan. By looking at both station buildings still operating as stations and former station buildings which have been given new roles, it endeavors to clarify their architectural concepts when first built and their current conditions, and to contribute thereby to the preservation and conservation of station buildings in our country.

     This paper (2) focuses on 16 former station buildings no longer in service among the station buildings registered as tangible cultural properties. It analyzes each station’s historical transitions, architectural concept, its state of preservation and state of reuse. On this basis, it examines them in comparative verification in terms of station, station building, and related facilities.

     If we look at the state of the stations, they can be divided in two categories, stations still in service, though the former station buildings have been retired, and stations totally closed down. Moreover, the state of the former station buildings varies considerably. Some are preserved at the same location and others are preserved by transporting them whole to, or reassembling them at, a different location. Among the stations closed and no longer in service, moreover, there are station buildings preserved by transporting them whole to a different location. Their methods of reuse at present also vary but there are relatively many cases of them being converted to exhibiting facilities, restaurants and meeting halls.

     What is important, when thinking about the preservation and reuse of former station buildings, is enabling people to imagine the station building when it was still in use. This is achieved by preserving not only the original building’s exterior appearance but also the waiting room decor and components of the ticket windows and wickets, and moreover the platform and other exterior facilities.

     It is hoped this study will become a guidepost for considering the preservation and reuse of former station buildings no longer in service, hereafter.

  • 全国の登録有形文化財駅舎に関する研究(その1)
    大内田 史郎
    日本建築学会計画系論文集
    2018年 83 巻 748 号 1155-1162
    発行日: 2018年
    公開日: 2018/06/30
    ジャーナル フリー
     In Japan, these days, social demand for the preservation and reuse of station buildings is growing. There are even examples of entire railway lines being registered as a network of cultural properties that includes station buildings and other related facilities as well, an approach that applies to advantage the character of a railway line. Meanwhile, registering station buildings as tangible cultural properties is also viewed as a regional opportunity. Expectations are high that more of these station buildings able to become symbols and tourism resources that contribute to regional activation will be preserved and conserved, for the sake of Japan's regional vitalization, hereafter.
     Amid this social environment, this study specifically examines station buildings registered as tangible cultural properties throughout Japan. By looking at both station buildings still operating as stations and former stations which have been given new roles, it endeavors to clarify the architectural concepts of the stations when first built and their current conditions, and to contribute thereby to the preservation and reuse of stations in our country. This paper (1) reveals the current situation of railway stations registered as tangible cultural properties and studies the preservation and conservation of stations in the context of the entire railway line.
     First, I make clear the present overall picture of nationwide station buildings registered as tangible cultural properties—60 still in operation as stations and 16 closed and being used in new ways. I present an analysis of their locations and regions, structures and scale, and trends in criterion being taken as standards for registering operating station buildings and former station buildings, respectively.
     Next, based on the field survey we conducted of 20 tangible cultural property station buildings on three railways registered in entirety as networks of cultural properties (stations and related facilities)—Watarase Keikoku Railway (38 sites), Tenryu Hamanako Railway (36 sites), and Wakasa Railway (23 sites)—I outline our information on the current status of each station building’s preservation or conservation, and examine the characteristic features of each railway line.
     Finally, I undertake comparative verification of the three railway lines and their tangible cultural property station buildings and reveal elements common to all three. The three railways all have base stations with head offices attached and facilities necessary for railway operation in the surrounding area. All are also single-story wooden buildings built before World War II. Then, all the station buildings, except Oomama station on the Watarase Keikoku Railway, basically remain in the form in which they were originally built. Moreover, the platforms of all the stations on the Watarase Keikoku Railway and Wakasa Railway are separately registered as tangible cultural properties, a fact that made me realize the importance of preserving facilities besides station buildings.
     In terms of other functions currently established in the station buildings, some spaces in stations on the Tenryu Hamanako Railway and Wakasa Railway are actively employed as shops. Most display a plate that reads “Tangible Cultural Property,” a device I feel to be quite effective in the preservation and conservation of the buildings.
     It is hoped this study will become a guidepost for considering the registration of existing station buildings as tangible cultural properties for preservation and conservation in the future.
  • 藤岡 洋保
    建築史学
    1997年 28 巻 147-152
    発行日: 1997年
    公開日: 2018/08/19
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 多冶見 左近, 三浦 要一
    日本建築学会計画系論文報告集
    1992年 436 巻 71-78
    発行日: 1992/06/30
    公開日: 2017/12/25
    ジャーナル フリー
    The purpose of this study is to make clear housing urbanization in Hamadera district of Sakai City. Hamadera-tochi Co. was established in 1918 by landowners and prominent citizen for housing development of Hamadera district. In 1930 Hamadera Land Readjustment Association was organized and development area was expanded. They made good dwelling environment and facilities jointly in Hamadera district. Certain zone in the district was designated as open space zoning district. In spite of the advance of industrial land use in surrounding area, the housing development by Hamadera-Tochi Co. gave a certain effect to urbanization of Hamadera district and Sakai City.
  • 村上 しほり, 大場 修, 砂本 文彦, 角 哲, 玉田 浩之, 長田 城治
    日本建築学会計画系論文集
    2020年 85 巻 778 号 2839-2849
    発行日: 2020年
    公開日: 2020/12/30
    ジャーナル フリー

     This paper aims to clarify procurement and construction process of Dependent Housing and private dwelling and buildings in occupied Osaka prefecture by the research of official documents in Japan and the United States.

     At the end of the war, modern architectures remained in the non-war-damaged areas of central Osaka. Unexpectedly, in Osaka, which became the base of the occupation army next to Kyoto in western Japan, they were requested on a large scale. In the procurement of buildings, the situation of disaster and hygiene and the scale of facilities were emphasized. The use of the requisitioned building was changed as needed, but 25 cases were not released until 1952.

     Privately owners have appealed to the Governor of Osaka Prefecture about the situation in which many properties are not returned even if the Treaty of San Francisco was concluded. As a result, the governor requested the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to release privately-owned buildings and private dwelling. The army facilities in Osaka city have been moved from the city center to several "suburbs". The "suburbs" recognized by the occupation forces were Sakai, Otsu, Amagasaki, and Nara.

     Former military grounds were requisitioned in the earliest days of occupation for example land around Osaka Castle, Kanaoka Camp in Sakai City. Because of the existence of the former Army National Land in Osaka Prefecture, it was possible to secure a vast site. In Hyogo prefecture, there was no former military grounds near the port of Kobe, lands for private owners were required, and the sacrifice of requisition in each city was different.

     The privately-owned requisitioned dwellings in Osaka Prefecture were located in the Hokusetsu area (Minoo, Ikeda) for the 5th Air Force, the suburbs of Osaka City area (Sumiyoshi, Abeno) and the Senboku area (Sakai, Takaishi) for the 25th Infantry Division. The Hamadera residential area and Ueno Shiba residential area, which were formed in Sakai city in the early Showa era, were requisitioned for the largest number of dwellings in Osaka prefecture.

     The "Hamadera Park DH" for the 25th division of the 8th army was constructed in Osaka Prefecture Hamadera Park ( in Sakai City and Takaishi City) from Sep. 1946 to Jan. 1948. This was the design supervision of the Osaka Prefecture Special Construction Division as Dependent Housing, and the construction of Obayashi, Zenitaka, and Asanuma groups. The 8th army 323th technical unit also conducted on-site instruction. It was used as the DH of Itami Air Force Base after 1952. Although the release movement was launched against the long-term entry of Japanese people to Hamadera Park, the decision to completely return it was delayed in Feb. 1958 when the return of Itami Air Base was decided.

     Consistent and enthusiastic negotiations with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs by Osaka Prefecture have come to fruition. While the relationship between Osaka City and suburban residential areas outside the city remained unchanged during the occupation period, it became clear that the scope of the "suburbs" expanded and the army moved to other prefectures.

  • 大阪府域の高地と低地の間で
    高橋 誠一
    人文地理
    1975年 27 巻 2 号 113-144
    発行日: 1975/04/28
    公開日: 2009/04/28
    ジャーナル フリー
    Many works have been proposed as to the location of settlements in Yayoi era. But the problems about the character and origin of upland settlements have been not yet solved. There are a variety of views about its character and origin. There are as follows; (A) Hill-Fort or Camp, (B) settlement for arable farming, (C) upland settlement refuged from flood, (D) religious settlement etc.
    In this article I examined sites of Yayoi settlements in Osaka prefecture and arrived at the following conclusions.
    i) The location of sites are different from the 1st period to the 5th period in Yayoi era.
    ii) The number of settlements are rapidly increased in the 3rd and the 5th period. In the former period settlements increased on upland and in the latter they increased both on upland and on lowland.
    iii) Great disturbances happened two times in Yayoi era, at least in Osaka prefecture. These disturbances correspond to the great rebellions before and after Queen ‘Himiko’ recorded in historical writings of ancient China.
    iv) Some settlements on upland surely had the militaly function under the background of the disturbances above mentioned.
    v) Some settlements refuged from flood were also formed in the 4th and the 5th period.
    vi) In the 3rd and the 5th period the population growth with the advance of product and the spread of the space of life are notably recognized.
feedback
Top