詳細検索結果
以下の条件での結果を表示する: 検索条件を変更
クエリ検索: "緒方竹虎"
91件中 1-20の結果を表示しています
  • 吉田路線の再検証
    井上 正也
    国際政治
    2008年 2008 巻 151 号 36-53,L7
    発行日: 2008/03/15
    公開日: 2010/09/01
    ジャーナル フリー
    On December 27, 1951, Prime Minister Yoshida Shigeru sent John F. Dulles a letter that explained “Counter infiltration” against China. Yoshida thought the best way to wean Chinese from the Communist regime was by sending people into China through trade activities and encouraging an anticommunist movement in China. He believed that Japan could have a major role in such an operation. The purpose of this paper is to examine Yoshida's “Counter infiltration” plan against China from the standpoint of intelligence. Yoshida, taking a special interest in intelligence, established intelligence organs such as the Public Security Intelligence Agency and the Cabinet Research Chamber (CRC) in quick succession soon after the San Francisco Peace Treaty went into effect in April 1952. Worried about indirect aggression from communist countries, Yoshida concentrated his efforts on developing an interior intelligence framework. At the same time, he tried to foster the growth of a Japanese intelligence organization that could gather information and perform covert operations it Mainland China.
    This study shows that Yoshida proactively tried to strengthen intelligence cooperation with governments of both Taiwan and the United States. Yoshida appointed Ogata Taketora Chief Cabinet Secretary and made him supervisor of Japanese intelligence organs. Ogata urged the Nationalist government on Taiwan to cooperate in establishing a Communist information exchange organ, and asked the U. S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) for assistance in creating a Japanese CIA. On the other hand, Yoshida let retired lieutenant General Tatsumi Eiichi recruit ex-military personnel for service in the CRC. With the assistance of Tatsumi, the CRC started actual intelligence activity against China after January 1953. The CRC interrogated repatriates from China, and proposed a joint operation with the CIA to use Japanese agents. Thus Yoshida tried to establish a Japanese intelligence system and backed U. S. strategy against China in the intelligence field.
    Yoshida's idea, however, was frustrated by rapid changes at home and abroad. After the Peace Treaty came into force, Yoshida couldn't maintain a firm hold on power. Not only the opposition parties but also the media criticized Ogata's plan to launch a Japanese CIA. In the end, Ogata had no choice but to downscale his ambitious plans, and eliminate overseas covert operations. Moreover, Yoshida's confrontational approach against the Chinese government was criticized for being behind the times after the Indochina armistice in 1954. In the last days of his ministry, Yoshida encouraged both Britain and U. S. to set up a “high command” on China in Singapore. His aim was to use overseas Chinese based in Southeast Asia to infiltrate Mainland China, but his idea wasn't put into practice because he was unable to gain the support of either Britain and the United States or even his own entourage.
  • 佐々木 清亮
    軽金属
    1956年 1956 巻 18 号 3
    発行日: 1956/03/31
    公開日: 2009/09/04
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 竹内 桂
    法政論叢
    2018年 54 巻 1 号 121-
    発行日: 2018年
    公開日: 2018/07/14
    ジャーナル フリー
  • ―戦時経済論と戦後啓蒙を中心に
    吉田 則昭
    出版研究
    1997年 28 巻 111-133
    発行日: 1998/03/20
    公開日: 2020/03/31
    ジャーナル フリー

    The purpose of this paper is to summarize and reexamine journalist Ryu Shintaro and his works. He wrote the bestseller, “Reformation of the Economy in Japan (Nihonkeizai no saihennsei)” in Prince Konoe's new order while he was a journalist and part of the brain trust of the New Economic Order in 1940. After the war, “Mono no mikata ni tsuite”, which had strong influence on the defeated mind of the Japanese people, and “Hanamizake no Keizai”, which warned of rapid economic growth, also became bestsellers.

    This article examines how his books became bestsellers from the prewar to the postwar period with the social context in Japan. There existed social change and the popularization of mass society. In 1960 comparing the history of publishing with that of mass media, this study points out both separate and continuous components in modern history in Japan.

  • 栗田 尚弥, 上山 和雄
    史学雑誌
    1997年 106 巻 5 号 846-851
    発行日: 1997/05/20
    公開日: 2017/11/30
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 事務局
    新聞学評論
    1965年 14 巻 198-205
    発行日: 1965/03/01
    公開日: 2017/10/06
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 李 相哲
    マス・コミュニケーション研究
    1993年 43 巻 160-172,207-20
    発行日: 1993/12/28
    公開日: 2017/10/06
    ジャーナル フリー
    When was the beginnig of Japanese newspaper managed in Manchuria? Who founded this newspaper and what were the reasons lying behind it are the subjects of this thesis. Manchuria Nippo was the first Japanese newspaper managed in Manchuria. Under the military rule, it was founded by Nakajima Masao, who was asked by the military government in Yingkou of Manchuria on the 26th of july in 1905. This Manchuria Nippo has not been well-known until recently. Newspaper Manchuria Nippo Since Japan invaded Manchuria, there were four kinds of daily newspapers published under the name of Manchuria Nippo, namely: 1) Manchuria Nippo founded by Nakajima Masao in Yingkou on July 26, 1905. 2) Manchuria Nippo founded by Nakajima Masao in Fengtian on December 5, 1907. 3) Manchuria Nippo in Dalian, on November 1, 1927, as a result of the merger of Ryoto Shinbun and Manchuria Nichinichi Shinbun. 4) Manchuria Nippo founded in Xinjing by the merger of Manchuria Shinbun and Manchuria Nichinichi Shinbun on April, 1944. This thesis is about Manchuria Nippo in Yingkou, the first newspaper managed by Japanese Even though Manchuria Nippo in Yingkou had no direct relation with the others (except with Manchuria Nippo in Fengtian), its existence was crucial since it was a start of Japanese newspaper activities in Manchuria. Moreover, people who worked for this newspaper were the ones who portrayed a great influence on the management of the Japanese newspaper in the later period. This thesis is composed of nine parts as follows: 1) the historical background until the opening of the port in Yingkou 2) the invasion of Yingkou by Japan 3) the founding of Manchuria Nippo in Yingkou 4) the policy of publishing Manchuria Nippo and its characteristics 5) the development of Manchuria Nippo 6) the composition of articles of Manchuria Nippo 7) the newspaper activities of Nakajima Masao 8) the relation between Nakajima Masao and Manchuria Nippo 9) conclusion
  • 中北 浩爾
    国際政治
    2006年 2006 巻 145 号 165-168
    発行日: 2006/08/29
    公開日: 2010/09/01
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 会田 軍太夫
    窯業協會誌
    1956年 64 巻 726 号 C331-C336
    発行日: 1956/07/01
    公開日: 2010/04/30
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 日本外交の非正式チャンネル
    戸部 良一
    国際政治
    1983年 1983 巻 75 号 30-48,L7
    発行日: 1983/10/20
    公開日: 2010/09/01
    ジャーナル フリー
    The host of Japanese “peace-feelers” who tried to contact the Chinese side in order to bring about peace between the two warring nations in the period 1937-1941 may be regarded as “informal contact-makers” in the context of state-to-state negotiations. Depending on whether contact-makers have official credentials or not and whether their contacts are pre-announced (namely, announced to the public in advance) or not, informal contact-makers are of three types: those with unofficial capacity seeking pre-announced contacts; those with official capacity seeking secret contacts; and those with unofficial capacity seeking secret contacts.
    A detailed analysis of the binational contacts of this period reveals that no peace-feelers belonged to the first type mentioned above, while there were some peace-feelers such as diplomats who, in their official capacity, sought secret contacts. Apart from those diplomats who participated in the peace efforts, however, it is difficult to identify other peace-feelers who could belong to this second type, mainly because of the ambiguity of the definition of “official capacity.”
    The third type of informal contact-makers became active after Japan denied the the legitimacy of the Chinese Nationalist government in January 1938, thus prompting a breaking off of relations. Peace-feelers of this kind in this study included (1) a diplomat who contacted the Chinese at his discretion without advance official approval (2) military officers who without official credentials joined the search for peace; and, most significantly, (3) those private individuals who had no official capacity but who voluntarily sought opportunities for peace, utilizing their own personal ties with the Chinese and other influentials. Typically, they were Matsumoto Shigeharu (a journalist working in Shanghai for Domei News Agency and one of the entourage of Konoe Funimaro), Kayano Nagatomo (a “comrade” of the Chinese Revolution and a friend of Sun Yat-sen), and Nishi Yoshiaki (an official of the South Manchurian Railway Co.).
    The active presence of peace-feelers may be explained by the close, if not friendly, historical contacts between the two peoples and also by the relatively short distance between the two countries and the existence of neutral zones such as Hong Kong, Macao, and the Settlements in Shanghai, which made it easy for the informal contact-makers to operate. Another contributing factor may be the diffuseness of the Japanese (and perhaps Chinese, too) policy-making structures.
  • 村上 友章
    国際安全保障
    2021年 48 巻 4 号 106-110
    発行日: 2021/03/31
    公開日: 2022/04/01
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 奈良岡 聰智
    年報政治学
    2009年 60 巻 1 号 1_40-1_61
    発行日: 2009年
    公開日: 2013/02/07
    ジャーナル フリー
      In 1925 the Law of the election of the Lower House was revised, and the medium-sized constituency system was introduced. This system had been continued for about 70 years and given great influence to Japanese politics. Why and how was the medium-sized constituency system introduced in 1925? The aim of this paper is to answer this question.
      It has often been said that the three parties in power introduced it in order to escape from competing each other and to keep their base. This is the case, but the background was much more complicated. This paper focuses on three points.
      First, quite a few medium-sized constituencies had already been made when Hara Cabinet revised the Law of the election of the Lower House in 1919. It reflected wishes of Upper House, which was afraid of Seiyukai's mastery over Lower House, and wishes of some Seiyukai or independent MPs, who were afraid of changes of their constituencies.
      Second, the small-sized constituency system was greatly criticized among journalism and academic world after World War I. They insisted that corruption in election and higher cost for election was due to the small-sized constituency system, and they were generally welcome to proportional representation and multi party system in Europe. In 1923 Advisory Committee on Law expressed that proportional representation should be adopt. These voices promoted the review of the small-sized constituency system.
      Third, it was Kenseikai rather than three parties in power that took the initiative in introducing the medium-sized constituency system. Kenseikai did it in order to avoid returning to the large-sized constituency system, which was likely to make excessive multi party system, and to introduce the favorable election system to it. The medium-sized constituency system was favorable for Kenseikai in that it would not lose heavily. Kenseikai aimed to grow as one party in two party system, and the plan really came true after that.
  • 三好 正史
    近代日本の創造史
    2010年 9 巻 27-32
    発行日: 2010年
    公開日: 2010/04/20
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 小幡 尚
    史学雑誌
    2002年 111 巻 5 号 743-746
    発行日: 2002/05/15
    公開日: 2017/12/01
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 中島 康比古
    史学雑誌
    1997年 106 巻 5 号 838-841
    発行日: 1997/05/20
    公開日: 2017/11/30
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 跛行する「愚」
    野寄 勉
    昭和文学研究
    1999年 38 巻 59-70
    発行日: 1999/03/01
    公開日: 2023/05/15
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 終戦外交と戦後構想
    戸部 良一
    国際政治
    1995年 1995 巻 109 号 5-21,L5
    発行日: 1995/05/20
    公開日: 2010/09/01
    ジャーナル フリー
    It is said that Japan did not approach her enemies to end the hostilities until the last stage of the Pacific War. But she tried repeatedly to negotiate a cease-fire between herself and Nationalist China (Chungking) during the war. What made Japan consider a separate peace only with China? How did she intend to make peace with China? This paper aims to analyze the objectives of Japan's approach to China and to make clear the circumstances of her peace efforts toward Chungking.
    At first Japan contemplated making peace with China as a part of the plan to weaken the will of the United States to continue the war. As the tide of war turned unfavorably to her, Japan wanted to move her troops stationed in China to the other fronts by making a cease-fire with Chungking. In the last stage of the war, some of the Japanese leaders hoped that China would act as an intermediary between Japan and the United Nations to obtain less severe peace terms than unconditional surrender.
    Japan, however, did not negotiate directly with China. The approaches in the early stage of the war were limited to gathering intelligence about Chinese tendency to make peace. Japanese were afraid that they would betray their weakness if they made overtures to China. Japan relied on the Wang Ching-wei Government (Nanking) to make contact with Chungking. Nanking government leaders, especially Chou Fo-hai, opened and maintained various routes of contact with Chungking through liaison agents. But they used the routes as a means to pursue their own purposes other than making peace overtures.
    Japan did not regard China as a full-fledged member of the United Nations. So she expected that she would be able to exploit the differences between Chungking and its allies and to make a separate peace with it. But China would not show any attitude to accept Japan's overtures. Japan had few resources or means to induce China to consider making a separate peace.
  • 小宮 京
    選挙研究
    2010年 26 巻 1 号 5-13
    発行日: 2010年
    公開日: 2017/05/08
    ジャーナル オープンアクセス
    2009年9月,1955年の結成以来,ほぼ政権の座にあり続けた自由民主党の一党優位体制が崩壊し,民主党を中心とした鳩山由紀夫内閣が発足した。政治報道も変化した。とりわけ派閥という存在は,従来の自民党政権と,新しい民主党政権の断絶あるいは連続性を考える上で,興味深いテーマである。本稿は,この問題を考える前提作業として,自由民主党における非公式組織である派閥の機能について歴史的に検討する。その際,総裁選出過程における派閥の役割を,1920年代,1945-55年,1955年以降の三つの時代に分けて, 分析した。その結果,派閥のあり方を規定したのは,第一に,大日本帝国憲法や日本国憲法のもとでの運用,第二に,総裁選出方法との強い関連が明らかにされた。そして,派閥は,非公式の組織でありながら確固たる存在となったことが判明した。
  • 早稲田大学政治学研究会
    年報政治学
    1964年 15 巻 132-142
    発行日: 1964/12/21
    公開日: 2009/12/21
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 野村 高将
    法政論叢
    2006年 42 巻 2 号 80-97
    発行日: 2006/05/15
    公開日: 2017/11/01
    ジャーナル フリー
    There was the time when the Japanese people looked for a 'Real Independence' of Japan. The typical politicians was Ichiro Hatoyama and Nobusuke Kishi. Although the 'Real Independence' which they aimed at suffered a setback, the tendency to based on nature of Kishi in the reason is deep-ro-oted. This viewpoint is important. However, in my idea, abandonment of the single-seat constituency system introduction which Hatoyama tried is greatly related to the frustration of 'Real Independence' This paper describes the deliberation process of the single-seat constituency system of 1956, and the influence which its frustration had on the future generations.
feedback
Top