詳細検索結果
以下の条件での結果を表示する: 検索条件を変更
クエリ検索: "縦深防御"
4件中 1-4の結果を表示しています
  • ―地政学と歴史からの視点―
    平間 洋一
    国際安全保障
    2007年 35 巻 1 号 1-17
    発行日: 2007/06/30
    公開日: 2022/04/20
    ジャーナル フリー
  • 高木 哲一
    地質調査研究報告
    2005年 56 巻 3-4 号 147-157
    発行日: 2005/06/30
    公開日: 2014/11/15
    ジャーナル フリー
    米国では,核廃棄物政策法1982 修正法 (Nuclear waste policy act of 1982, as amended) に基づき,1987 年にネバダ州ヤッカマウンテン (Yucca Mountain) 地域が高レベル放射性廃棄物(使用済み核燃料を含む)最終処分場の唯一の候補地となって以来,DOE(U. S. Department of Energy: 米国エネルギー省)により15 年以上にわたり同サイトが適当か否かを判断するための調査・研究が行われてきた.これらの結果は,ヤッカマウンテン科学・工学報告書 (DOE, 2001) 及び最終環境影響評価書 (DOE. 2002) などに取りまとめられ,2001年にエネルギー省長官から大統領へ提出されたサイト推薦報告書に添付された.2002年にヤッカマウンテンサイトの立地承認決議案が,連邦議会上下両院で承認され大統領が署名したことにより,その立地が正式に承認された.これを受けて,2005年には建設認可のための許可申請書がDOE からNRC (U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission: 米国原子力規制委員会) に提出されることになっている.この間の経緯については,原子力環境整備促進・資金管理センター (2003) に詳細に解説されているのでここでは省略する. 日本では2000年の「特定放射性廃棄物の最終処分に関する法律」の制定により,高レベル放射性廃棄物の地層処分の方針が決定され,地層処分事業が正式に開始された.しかし,最終処分候補地の選定作業はこれからであり,米国と比べて事業のプロセスは少なくとも20年以上遅れていることになる.そこで,本解説では,日本でも将来必ず通過するプロセスである最終処分場の安全規制の一例として,ヤッカマウンテン最終処分場の安全規制について,その方針と法律の概要等を紹介する.
  • 武田 圭史
    システム/制御/情報
    2007年 51 巻 4 号 158-163
    発行日: 2007/04/15
    公開日: 2017/04/15
    解説誌・一般情報誌 フリー
  • 海洋の安全と強制力の役割
    山崎 眞
    国際政治
    2008年 2008 巻 154 号 154_145-154_160
    発行日: 2008/12/30
    公開日: 2011/01/26
    ジャーナル フリー
    Recently, it has been closed-up again that Japan relies on the import mostly of the energy source, food, and the raw material because the sudden rise of the oil price and the price hike of food and various raw materials, etc. occurred in early 2008. A serious discussion about the food security is happening, too. Japan imports most 99 percent of oil, 87 percent of wheat, 95 percent of the soybean, and 100 percent of other iron ore and rare metals, etc. and 98 percent of those materials are transported through Sea Lane. Japan has developed economically for 60 years after the war because such a raw material etc. were able to be imported without trouble by can the free use of the sea, and to export the product.
    A two great sea power of U. S. -Soviet was rivaled, and the stability of the ocean was kept because two great military power of U. S. -Soviet faced it at the cold war era. The balance of such a sea power collapses when the cold war is concluded, and the element of instability in the ocean has increased. Therefore, the confrontation by the race and the religion, etc. came to light, and the pirate and the outrage, etc. for the capital work of these group and organization came to be generated. Moreover, maritime terrorism came frequently to occur chiefly when becoming after 2000 years. Safety and the stability of the ocean are deteriorating than the cold war era because of such a situation, and it has come not to be able to disregard the influence given to the economy of the world. For instance, the Strait of Malacca passes by 50 percent of the amount of the oil transportation in the world and 30 percent of the amount of the world trade, and if here would be blockaded by the terrorism such as mines, it is said that the economy of the world will become a situation that nears panic.
    And furthermore, recent Chinese naval modernization and reinforcement and North Korean nuclear armament under opaque situation will bring insecurity in this region. 90 percent of the trade of the world depends on marine transport now. Moreover, 75 percent of the world's population and 80 percent of the capital are in the coastal frontier. Safety in the ocean therefore can be called a base for the world economy as well as the human race living. Especially, this is extremely important for Japan that is the maritime country.
    The ocean policy of Japan was something like a inconsistent stripe passes existed in the situation in which the national interest in the ocean was being lost for this by the government office organizations of lack of coordination so far. The former political administration of Prime Minister Abe enforced “The Basic Law of the Sea” to demonstrate a strong statesmanship considering such a situation and to straighten the situation as the country in July, 2007. The Cabinet Council was continuously decided to “Oceanic basic plan” based on this law in April 2008.
    On the other hand, the United States that valued safety and the stability of the ocean made “New Maritime Strategy” public after an interval of about 20 years in October 2007. This is a new idea of acquiring safety and the stability of the ocean in the world by cooperate about the ally and the friendly country strong. It is the one that the Maritime Self-Defense Force's being sending the fleet to the multinational fleet in the Indian Ocean coincident with such an idea. Now, there is no country that can defend safety in the ocean in the world by one country. Peace in the sea can be acquired only by concentrating the imperative power such as naval forces and coast guards in the world.
    It is necessary that Japan cooperate positively in such the world strategy.
feedback
Top