Circulation Journal
Online ISSN : 1347-4820
Print ISSN : 1346-9843
ISSN-L : 1346-9843
Arrhythmia/Electrophysiology
Right Parasternal Lead Placement Increases Eligibility for Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy in Adults With Congenital Heart Disease
Hideo OkamuraChristopher J. McLeodChristopher V. DeSimoneTracy L. WebsterCrystal R. BonnichsenMartha GroganSabrina D. PhillipsHeidi M. ConnollyNaser M. AmmashCarole A. WarnesPaul A. Friedman
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS FULL-TEXT HTML

2016 Volume 80 Issue 6 Pages 1328-1335

Details
Abstract

Background:The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) provides an attractive option for patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) in whom a transvenous defibrillator is contraindicated. Given the unusual cardiac anatomy and repolarization strain, the surface electrocardiogram (ECG) is frequently abnormal, potentially increasing the screen failure rate.Methods and Results:We prospectively screened 100 adult CHD patients regardless of the presence of clinical indication for ICD utilizing a standard left sternal lead placement, as well as a right parasternal position. Baseline patient and 12-lead ECG characteristics were examined to assess for predictors of screen failure. Average patient age was 48±14 years, average QRS duration was 134±37 ms, and 13 patients were pacemaker dependent. Using the standard left parasternal electrode position, 21 patients failed screening. Of these 21 patients with screen failure, 9 passed screening with the use of right parasternal electrode positioning, reducing screening failure rate from 21% to 12%. QT interval and inverted T wave anywhere in V2–V6 leads were found to be independent predictors of left parasternal screening failure (P=0.01 and P=0.04, respectively).Conclusions:Utilization of both left and right parasternal screening should be used in evaluation of CHD patients for S-ICD eligibility. ECG repolarization characteristics were also identified as novel predictors of screening failure in this group. (Circ J 2016; 80: 1328–1335)

Content from these authors
© 2016 THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top