Abstract
The present paper discusses architectural theory of Hubsch and its application to his buildings. In 1828 Hubsch published his thesis entitled "In welchem Style sollen wir bauen ?" (abbreviated to "Style" in the following). He recommended in this thesis the Rundbogenstil as a new style for the nineteenth century. But in the "Bau-Werke von Heinrich Hubsch " ("Bau Werke" in the following) published in 1838, he modified his theory of Rundbogenstil to some extent. Studies on Hubsch, however, have made no references to the relation of this modification to his works. As the result, the architectural thought of Hubsch was not properly interpreted. The present paper tries to clarify Hubsch's theory and how his idea was reflected on his works. In "Style" Hubsch adovocated, mainly from the technical viewpoint the use of round arches and vaults made of ordinary materials like brick or sandstone. On the other hand, in "Bau-Werke", he particuraly took up the problem of ornaments and the sizes of windows, because he felt the facades of Rundbogenstil plain. His theory In the days of "Style" was reflected on Polytechnische Hochschule (1833-35) and St. Cyriakus (1835-36), but Kunsthalle (1838-46) and Trinkhalle (1837-40), where polychromy by various materials was applied, must be distinguished from his earlier works. These later works reflected his modified theory which intended to break the monotony of plain Rundbogenstil. Hubsch certainly had given effect to his architectural theory proposed in "Style" and all his buildings were not stuccoed. But, soon after 1828, he modified his theory, and at last he adopted polychromy in his buildings. Kunsthalle and Trinkhalle were the first of his later works which are represented by Hoftheater and Orangerie. Hubsch's architectural as well as theoretical works clearly indicate that he attached great importance to the aesthetic aspects of a building and this was closely related to the transformation of his later works. And therefore, his "Bau-Werke" seems more significant than "Style" for the understanding of his architecture.
