抄録
This critical synthesis argues that lexicogrammatical knowledge (knowledge of words, multiword expressions (MWEs),
and their typical grammatical patterning) is a major factor shaping second language (L2) proficiency across receptive
and productive domains. Drawing on meta-analyses and influential empirical studies within a usage-based framework,
this paper examines four propositions: (a) lexical knowledge robustly predicts receptive performance, (b) productive
use of MWEs is associated with speaking fluency and writing quality, (c) explicit grammar instruction may contribute
less uniquely when lexical patterns are accounted for, and (d) strategy instruction appears less effective when lexical
coverage falls below approximately 95%. Across the reviewed studies, lexicogrammatical knowledge appears to be a
central source of variation in L2 performance, while grammar instruction alone and strategy training tend to yield
smaller gains without sufficient vocabulary knowledge. This interpretation aligns with usage-based accounts of
language learning and finds a broad analogy in how statistical language models exploit co-occurrence patterns. The
paper argues for prioritizing lexical enrichment, embedding grammar within chunk-based input, and sequencing
strategy training after adequate lexical coverage, offering educators a framework for curricula that promote more
naturalistic proficiency.