抄録
The aim of this paper is to clarify the difference between “Indigenous Life” of Sanshiro Ishikawa and Japanese Physiocracy, and by this, emboss Ishikawa's resistance thought against powers.
Sanshiro Ishikawa (1876-1956) had lived as a resistant without following the national policy during fifteen years war in the period of the Japanese “Fascism”. His resistance thought can be summed up as “Indigenous Life”. In the formation of “Indigenous Life”, Ishikawa was much affected by Shozo Tanaka and the matter of Yanaka village. In consequence of this, Ishikawa became to hold the problem that he had to dis-construct powers in his life first of all. Therefore, we should understand the nature to which he attached great importance as a symbol of no-powers.
In this paper, Japanese Physiocracy means the thought that had exercised influence in 1930's and can be called ‘rural community-first principal’. “Indigenous Life” is different from this Japanese Physiocracy as follows:
(1) “Indigenous Life” did not have deep expectation to rural community.
(2) “Indigenous Life” did not agree with the autonomous community federation that Japanese Physiocrats had tried to construct.
(3) “Indigenous Life” had observed social phenomenon from the viewpoint of powers.
After all, “Indigenous Life” means the thought and movement to dis-construct omnipresent powers.
