J-STAGE Home  >  Publications - Top  > Bibliographic Information

Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Vol. 20 (2014) No. 2 p. 93-98

Language:

http://doi.org/10.5761/atcs.ra.13-00314

Review Articles

The safety and efficacy of thoracoscopic and robot-assisted lobectomies for primary lung cancer were reviewed in the literature. Thoracoscopic surgery is less invasive compared to thoracotomy, and it has been reported to be superior with regard to the outcome. In addition, the operability of a surgical robot (da Vinci) is favorable and supplements the disadvantages of conventional endoscopic surgery. Robot-assisted lobectomy has been reported to be comparable to thoracoscopic surgery with regard to the safety and efficacy based on analysis of perioperative results and superior with regard to the operability and length of the learning curve. However, a high cost and a long operative time are of concern. Since robot-assisted surgery has been performed only in early cases, the continuation of a comparative investigation may be necessary.

Copyright © 2014 The Editorial Committee of Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Article Tools

Share this Article