Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Online ISSN : 2186-1005
Print ISSN : 1341-1098
ISSN-L : 1341-1098

この記事には本公開記事があります。本公開記事を参照してください。
引用する場合も本公開記事を引用してください。

Cost-Benefit Performance Simulation of Robot-Assisted Thoracic Surgery As Required for Financiall Viability under the 2016 Revised Reimbursement Paradigm of the Japanese National Health Insurance System
Naohiro KajiwaraYasufumi KatoMasaru HagiwaraMasatoshi KakihanaTatsuo OhiraNorihiko KawateNorihiko Ikeda
著者情報
ジャーナル オープンアクセス 早期公開

論文ID: oa.17-00094

この記事には本公開記事があります。
詳細
抄録

Purpose: To discuss the cost–benefit performance (CBP) and establish a medical fee system for robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) under the Japanese National Health Insurance System (JNHIS), which is a system not yet firmly established.

Methods: All management steps for RATS are identical, such as preoperative and postoperative management. This study examines the CBP based on medical fees of RATS under the JNHIS introduced in 2016.

Results: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) and robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) now receive insurance reimbursement under the category of use of support devices for endoscopic surgery ($5420 and $3485, respectively). If the same standard amount were to be applied to RATS, institutions would need to perform at least 150 or 300 procedures thoracic operation per year to show a positive CBP ($317 per procedure as same of RALP and $130 per procedure as same of RAPN, respectively).

Conclusion: Robotic surgery in some areas receives insurance reimbursement for its “supportive” use for endoscopic surgery as for RALP and RAPN. However, at present, it is necessary to perform da Vinci Surgical System Si (dVSi) surgery at least 150–300 times in a year in a given institution to prevent a deficit in income.

著者関連情報
© 2018 The Editorial Committee of Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons [Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International] license.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
feedback
Top