Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin
Online ISSN : 1347-5215
Print ISSN : 0918-6158
ISSN-L : 0918-6158
Regular Articles
Effects of Musca domestica Cecropin on the Adhesion and Migration of Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma BEL-7402 Cells
Xiao-bao JinHan-fang MeiQiao-hong PuJuan ShenXue-mei LuFu-jiang ChuJia-yong Zhu
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS FULL-TEXT HTML

2013 Volume 36 Issue 6 Pages 938-943

Details
Abstract

This study was designed to explore the effects of Musca domestica antimicrobial peptides cecropin on the adhesion and migration of human hepatocellular carcinoma BEL-7402 cells. The adhesive and migratory capacities were determined by adhesion assay and transwell assay, respectively. The changes in microvilli of tumor cells were determined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Western blotting and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) were carried out to determine the expression levels of proteins related to adhesion and migration, such as matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP2), tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase-2 (TIMP2), and epithelial cadherin (E-cadherin). We found that Musca domestica cecropin inhibited the adhesion and migration of BEL-7402 cells, which also displayed curling microvilli, increased ball structures on cell surface, gradually broken connections between tumor cells, and even disappeared microvilli on some cells. The expression of MMP2 was significantly reduced after cecropin treatment, while the levels of TIMP2 and E-cadherin were significantly increased. These results suggest that Musca domestica cecropin inhibits the adhesion and migration of human hepatocellular carcinoma BEL-7402 cells by destroying the microvilli of tumor cells and changing the expression of MMP2, TIMP2 and E-cadherin.

The cecropins are a family of antimicrobial peptides that were first isolated by Boman et al. from the Hyatophora cecropia pupae.1,2) They are able to form specific amphipathic alpha-helices, which allow them to target nonpolar lipid cell membranes, and have strong antibiotic activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria at low micromolar concentrations.3,4) More recent studies have also indicated the antitumor activity of cecropins against various cancer cell lines of leukemia, lymphoma, colon carcinoma, small cell lung cancer and gastric cancer, but without damage to human normal cells which would make it a good candidate for the development of anti-tumor agents.5,6)

The Musca domestica gene cecropin (GenBank accession number: EF175878) was cloned in our laboratory from the larva.7) We have also shown that it inhibits the proliferation and promotes the apoptosis of human hepatocellular carcinoma BEL-7402 cells, human lung cancer A549 cells, human breast cancer MCF-7 cells and human cervical cancer HeLa cells without affecting the normal liver cells. In these cancer cells, the hepatomcellular carcinoma cell line BEL-7402 is the most sensitive to cecropin.8,9) Proliferation, adhesion and migration are important biological characteristics of tumor cells. In this study, we explored whether Musca domestica antimicrobial peptide cecropin affects the adhesive and migratory capacities of human hepatocellular carcinoma BEL-7402 cells and the underlying mechanism.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Preparation of Musca domestica Antimicrobial Peptide Cecropin

The Musca domestica cecropin was expressed through the COS-7 eukaryotic expression system and purified to reach 99% purity identified by HPLC using a nickel-chelating Sepharose column as described previously.10) Its amino acid sequence is MNFNKLFVFVALVLAVCIGQSEAGWLKKIGKKIERVGQHTRDATIQTIGVAQQAANVAATLKG. The peptide was dissolved in RPMI 1640 medium at 500 mm and sterilized by filtration through a 0.2 mm filter before experiments.

Adhesion Assay

Each well of 96-well plates was precoated overnight at 4°C with 50 mg/mL FN (Laboratory of Cell Biology, Health Scientific Center of Peking University, China) and blocked with 10 mg/mL bovine serum albumin (BSA). With or without 24 h of cecropin treatments at different concentrations at 37°C, about 3.0×105/well human hepatocellular carcinoma BEL-7402 cells were seeded into 6-well plates. The next day, the BEL-7402 cells were resuspended in RPMI 1640, plated into the precoated 96-well tissue plates (2.0×103 cells/well), and incubated at 37°C (5% CO2) for 1 h. The supernatant was replaced by new RPMI 1640, and the plates were chilled on ice for 10 min before being photographed. Then the supernatant was removed, and cell layers were washed with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and incubated with 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) (50 µL, 0.5 mg/mL) in RPMI 1640 without fetal bovine serum for 4 h at 37°C. The cell culture was centrifuged at 1000×g for 5 min before the supernatant was discarded. Subsequently, 150 µL of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was added to dissolve the formazan crystals formed in cells. The optical density (OD) was then measured by a microplate reader (Thermo Molecular Devices Co., Sunnyvale, U.S.A.) at 570 nm. The cell adhesion rate was calculated as: cell adhesion rate=(OD value of experimental group/control group OD value)×100%. The assay was repeated three times for each sample.

Migration Assay

The Transwell migration assay was performed with modified Boyden Chambers containing polycarbonate membranes (8 µm pores, Costar) as described previously.11) Both sides of the membrane were coated and air-dried with 10 µL fibronectin (FN, 1 mg/mL) before being placed into 24-well plates. With or without 24 h treatments of cecropin at different concentrations at 37°C, about 3.0×105/well BEL-7402 cells were seeded into 6-well plates. The next day, the cells were added to the upper chamber at 2×105 cells/well, and the lower chamber was filled with RPMI 1640 containing 4 µg/mL FN1. After 6 h incubation at 37°C (5% CO2), the membrane was fixed in methanol, and the cells on the upper surface were mechanically removed. The migrated cells on the lower side of the membrane were stained with Giemsa and photographed under a light microscope at ×200 magnification. Four random microscopic fields were counted per membrane, and three membranes from each group were analyzed at the same time. Other cells that migrated and attached to the lower surface of the filter were trypsinized and resuspended in 300 µL RPMI 1640 medium. The cell suspension was added to 96-well plates with each well containing 100 µL RPMI 1640 and 50 µL MTT (0.5 mg/mL). Four hours later, the supernatant was discarded, and 150 µL DMSO was added to solubilize the formazan crystals formed in cells. Finally, the absorbance was measured colorimetrically at 570 nm. The cell migration rate was calculated with the OD values of non-migrated and migrated cells. The rate of migration=ODmig/(ODmig+ODnon)×100%, where ODmig is the OD value of migrated cells and ODnon is the OD value of non-migrated cells. The assay was repeated three times for each sample.

Scanning Electron Microscopy

3×104 BEL-7402 cells in 2 mL RPMI 1640 were seeded into 6-well plates, in which each well contained one cover glass that allowed cells to crawl growth at 37°C overnight. The next day, cecropin was added to a final concentration of 50 µm, and the mixture was incubated for 24 h. The cover glasses were then removed from the plate, washed with PBS, fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde (Sigma, St. Louis, U.S.A.) for 30 min, and re-washed with PBS. They were re-fixed with 1% osmic acid (Sigma) for 30 min and washed with PBS. The dehydration was done in 50%, 70% and 90% ethanol (Sigma) for 20 min with each concentration. Then the cover glasses were put into isoamyl acetate (Sigma) for 30 min and placed at 4°C overnight. The next day, all cover glasses were observed under a scanning electron microscope (Zeiss, Berlin, Germany). The experiment was repeated three times for each sample.

Western Blot Analysis Detection of Matrix Metalloproteinase (MMP2), Tissue Inhibitors of Metalloproteinase-2 (TIMP2) and E-Cadherin Expression

Cultures of BEL-7402 cells at approximately 80% confluence were treated with 25, 50, 100 µm cecropin for 24 h, and no cecropin was present in the control well. Cells were then harvested and placed in 1 mL lysis buffer (1% Triton X-100, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.5 mg/mL leupetin, 1 mm ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, 1 mg/mL pepstatin, and 0.2 mm phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). The protein concentration was determined by the bicinchoninic acid method (Pierce, Rockford, IL, U.S.A.), and 20 µg of protein was loaded onto 15% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis-sodium dodecyl sulfate gel (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, U.S.A.), separated by electrophoresis, and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. The membranes were blocked with 5% nonfat milk and 1% polyvinylpyrrolidone in PBS for 30 min and then incubated for 1 h with 1 mg/mL antibodies to MMP2, TIMP2, E-cadherin and β-tubulin (Santa Cruz, CA, U.S.A.). Then the membrane was incubated for 1 h with a peroxidase-conjugated antibody (Santa Cruz, CA, U.S.A.) for 1 h at room temperature after washing. Final detection was accomplished with Western blot luminol reagent (SC-2048; Santa Cruz, CA, U.S.A.) as described by the manufacturer. The density of target bands was quantified by the computer-aided 1-D gel analysis system. The experiment was repeated three times for each sample.

Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) Detection of MMP2, TIMP2 and E-Cadherin Expression

Cultures of BEL-7402 cells at approximately 80% confluence were treated with 25, 50, 100 µm cecropin for 24 h, and no cecropin was present in the control well. Cells were harvested and RNA was extracted using Trizol (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD, U.S.A.). Aliquot of 2 µg total RNA was transcribed reversely using MMLV reverse transcriptase (Promega, Madison, WI, U.S.A.). cDNA samples were subjected to qPCR using Thunderbird SYBR qPCR Mix (TOYOBO, Osaka, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions on a Miniopticon qPCR detection system (Bio-Rad). Data collection and analysis was performed with Opticon3.0 software (Bio-Rad). β-Tubulin gene was used as an endogenous control. Oligonucleotide primers used for qPCR were synthesized by Shanghai Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) and as follows: MMP2 gene (Accession No. NM_004530), sense-5′-ATG GAG GCG CTA ATG GCC CG-3′ and antisense-5′-GCC AAC TCT TTG TCC GT-3′; TIMP2 gene (Accession No. NM_003255), sense-5′-ATG GGC GCC GCG GCC CGC AC-3′ and antisense-5′-GTC ATC ACT ACA TCT GCA T-3′; E-cadherin gene (Accession No. Z18923), sense-5′-ATG GGC CCT TGG AGC CGC AGC -3′ and antisense-5′-CGT GAA CGT GTA GCT CTC G-3′; β-tubulin gene (Accession No. NM_177987), sense-5′-ATG AGG GAG ATC GTG CTC ACG -3′ and antisense-5′-GAT GCG CTC CAG CTG CAG -3′. The experiment was repeated three times for each sample.

Statistical Analysis

The data are presented as the mean±S.D. and analyzed with SPSS 11.0 using the one-way ANOVA least significance difference statistical analysis method. A difference was determined as statistically significant when p<0.05.

RESULTS

Effects of Cecropin on the Adhesion of BEL-7402 Cells

The adhesion of BEL-7402 cells was determined with MTT assay, along with CCD camera imaging that monitored the adhered cells. As shown in Fig. 1, Musca domestica cecropin inhibited significantly the adhesion ability of human hepatocellular carcinoma BEL-7402 cells at 25–100 µm in a dose-dependent manner. The adhesion rates after 24-h treatments of 25, 50 and 100 µm cecropin were 68.6±1.1%, 56.4±1.3% and 44.5±0.9% as compared with control, respectively.

Fig. 1. Adhesion Assay of BEL-7402 Cells Treated with 25, 50 and 100 µm Cecropin

After 24 h treatments, the cell adhesion rate was measured. The number of adhered cells was captured by CCD camera imaging and assessed by MTT assay. Data are presented as the mean±S.D. from three repeated assays. * p<0.05 compared with the control group (without cecropin). Magnification, 200×.

Effects of Cecropin on the Migration of BEL-7402 Cells

To test whether cecropin inhibits migration of human hepatocellular carcinoma cells, the transwell assay was performed. To rule out the possibility that decreased cell migration after cecropin treatment might be caused by decreased total cell number, in fact, the rate of migration was expressed as ODmig/(ODmig+ODnon)×100%, where ODmig is the OD value of migrated cells and ODnon is the OD value of non-migrated cells. The OD values were determined by MTT assay. Figure 2 showed that cecropin treatment led to concentration-dependent decrease in cell migration after 24-h incubation. The rates of migration were 34.2±0.8%, 26.1±0.8%, 19.4±1.2%, and 14.7±1.1% after 24-h treatment of 0, 25, 50 and 100 µm cecropin, respectively.

Fig. 2. Migration Assay of BEL-7402 Cells Treated with 25, 50 and 100 µm Cecropin

BEL-7402 cells were seeded into the upper compartment of transwell chambers for migration assay after 24 h treatments of cecropin at different concentrations. The rate of cell migration was measured by MTT assay, and the number of migrated cells was captured by CCD camera imaging (200×). Data are presented as the mean±S.D. from three repeated assays. * p<0.05 compared with the control group (without cecropin). Magnification, 200×.

Effects of Cecropin on the Morphology of BEL-7402 Cells

The electronic microscopy assay showed that the control BEL-7402 cells had integral cell membrane with rich microvilli, curl plexiform, regular arrays, and filament distribution. However, cecropin treatment resulted in cell body shrinkage, curling and distorting surface microvilli, gradually increasing ball structure, gradually breaking cell connections, widening cell gaps, and missing parts of cell surface microvilli (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3. Scanning Electron Microscopy of BEL-7402 Cells Treated with 50 µm Cecropin

After 24 h treatment of 50 µm cecropin, the cell morphology was observed under scanning electron microscope at different magnifications. The surface microvilli of cells treated with 50 µm cecropin displayed significant changes compared with the control group.

Effects of Cecropin on the Expression of MMP2, TIMP2 and E-Cadherin

To explore the underlying mechanism for cecropin-induced inhibition of the adhesion and migration of BEL-7402 cells, we sought to determine the effects of cecropin on the expression of two common migration-related proteins MMP2 and TIMP2, as well as the adhesion-related protein E-cadherin. As shown in Fig. 4A, Western blotting assay revealed that after 24 h treatment, cecropin (25–100 µm) dose-dependently suppressed the expression of MMP2, whereas increased the expression of TIMP2 and E-cadherin significantly. To confirm the effect of cecropin on the expression of these proteins at the transcription level or post-transcription level, we performed qPCR assay to determine the effect of cecropin on MMP2, TIMP2 and E-cadherin mRNA levels after 24 h treatment. Figure 4B showed that consistent with the expression trends in Western blotting assay, cecropin administration significantly reduced the mRNA levels of MMP2, while enhanced the mRNA levels of TIMP2 and E-cadherin in a concentration-dependent manner. Therefore, there results suggest that cecropin affects the expression of MMP2, TIMP2 and E-cadherin probably at the transcription level.

Fig. 4. The Effects of Cecropin on the Expression of MMP2, TIMP2 and E-Cadherin after 24 h Incubation

(A) Western blotting showing effects of cecropin at indicated concentrations on MMP2, TIMP2 and E-cadherin expression. Bar graphs are derived from densitometric scanning of the blots. Bars are mean±S.D. from three independent experiments. * Significantly different from control, p<0.05. (B) qPCR results showing effects of cecropin at indicated concentrations on MMP2, TIMP2 and E-cadherin mRNAs expression. Bars are mean±S.D. from four independent experiments. * Significantly different from control, p<0.05.

DISCUSSION

Adhesion is the initiating step of cell migration and thus directly affects tumor metastasis.12) The adhesion in tumor migration and metastasis involves specific receptors or non-specific cell surface receptors and matrix components, such as laminin (LN, in the basement membrane), fibronectin (FN, in the extracellular matrix), and type IV collagen. During the process of adhesion, migrating tumor cells or their surrounding local cells secrete some enzymes to degrade local matrix to facilitate the chemotactic movement of tumor cells. This process is repeated continuously with outward expansion and invasion of tumor cells.13) FN plays an important role in adhesion as a major component of the extracellular matrix and basement membrane. In this study, we used FN to simulate the extracellular matrix in vitro and observed that Musca domestica cecropin inhibited the adhesion and migration of BEL-7402 cells (Figs. 1, 2).

The microvilli of tumor cells, normally intensive and long, play a key role in response to environmental changes and in their adhesion, migration and metastasis. They mediate the exchange of materials with the outside world to facilitate the malignant proliferation and attachment of tumor cells.14) In this study, we observed shrinking tumor cell body, curling and distorted surface microvilli, gradually increasing ball structure, gradually breaking connections between cells, widened cell gaps, and missing parts of the cell surface microvilli with treatments of Musca domestica cecropin (Fig. 3). This may contribute to the inhibited adhesion and migration of BEL-7402 cells by cecropin.

Tumor invasion and metastasis are complex processes, among which the adhesion of tumor cells to the extracellular matrix (ECM), ECM degradation, and the migration of tumor cells in the degradated matrix are critical.15) Therefore, ECM is a natural barrier to the invasion and metastasis of tumor cells.16) The degradation enzymes secreted by tumor cells or local cells include matrix metalloproteinase (MMPs), plasminogen activator, and cysteine protease.17) MMPs can be expressed and secreted by both tumor cells and stromal cells, and their activity is regulated by tissue inhibitors, TIMPs.18) The balance between MMPs and TIMPs is important for tumor cell invasion and metastasis, and MMP2 and TIMP2 are two critical members in these two families.19) In this study, we discovered that cecropin inhibited tumor cell migration rates in a dose-dependent manner, probably through the reduced expression of MMP2 and increased expression of TIMP2.

Tumor cell invasion and metastasis require many times of adhesion to accomplish, which is tightly regulated by cell adhesion molecules. Two critical such factors are cadherins and integrins.20) E-Cadherin is a classical member of the cadherin superfamily II, which requires extracellular calcium ions to mediate adhesion.21) It has been shown that reduced expression of E-cadherin negatively affects cell adhesion.22) Furthermore, exogenous expression of E-cadherin in some malignant tumors was able to significantly reduce tumor cell adhesion and metastasis.23) Integrin β1 is a transmembrane protein composed of α and β subunits that are connected by disulfide bonds. It can form the ligand-integrin β1-cytoskeleton transmembrane information system with cell matrix and cytoskeleton components to mediate tumor cell adhesion and metastasis.24) Therefore, reduced expression level of integrin β1 may suppress the migration ability of tumor cells. In this study, we observed significant increases in the expression level of E-cadherin with Musca domestica cecropin treatments, but the expression level of integrin β1 was not affected (data not shown). This indicates that cecropin inhibits tumor cell adhesion through regulation of E-cadherin expression.

In summary, we observed in this study that Musca domestica cecropin inhibits tumor cell adhesion and migration. Cecropin treatments also cause destruction of tumor cell microvilli, up-regulation of TIMP2 and E-cadherin, and down-regulation of MMP2, which may contribute to cecropin’s inhibitory effects on adhesion and migration of human hepatocellular carcinoma BEL-7402 cells. In the future, we will investigate in vivo to further explore Musca domestica cecropin’s effects on tumor adhesion and migration.

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by Grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 30671832) and the Guangdong Province Science and Technology Foundation (No. 2010B031200011).

REFERENCES
 
© 2013 The Pharmaceutical Society of Japan
feedback
Top