Nanoparticles have a variety of useful functions. They have already been put to practical use in products in many industrial arenas, such as the cosmetics and food fields. Therefore, we cannot avoid the unintentional nanoparticle exposure of vulnerable people such as pregnant women and infants, and the importance of evaluating the safety of such vulnerable generations, who are highly sensitive to chemical substances, has been pointed out worldwide. However, it is still difficult to determine the hazards posed by nanoparticle exposure in everyday life. From this perspective, to analyze the risk from nanoparticles to vulnerable generations, nano-safety science research has been conducted through the collection of toxicity information on nanoparticles based on their physicochemical properties and kinetics via the association analysis of physicochemical properties, kinetics, and toxicity. The results of this nano-safety science research have been used in nano-safety design research to develop safer forms of nanoparticles. The findings of these studies will not only provide insights that will help us to formulate new policies for the risk management of nanoparticles; they will also lead directly to the development of sustainable nanotechnology (nanotechnology that can be safely, usefully, and sustainably used). These developments will contribute not only to the development of the nano-industry and the promotion of its social acceptance, but also to future developments in the field of health science.

Antibodies that specifically target biomarkers are essential in clinical diagnosis. Genetic engineering has assisted in designing novel antibodies that offer greater antigen-binding affinities, thus providing more sensitive immunoassays. We have succeeded in generating a single-chain Fv fragment (scFv) targeted estradiol-17β (E₂) with more than 370-fold improved affinity, based on a strategy focusing the complementarity-determining region 3 in the V_H domain (V_H-CDR3). Systematic exploration of amino acid substitutions therein, using a clonal array profiling, revealed a cluster of four substitutions, containing H99P and a serial substitution E100eN–I100fA–L100gQ that lead to a 90-fold increase in E₂-binding affinity. This substitution quartet in the V_H-CDR3, combined with the substitution cluster I29V/L36M/S77G in the V_L domain, resulted in a scFv fragment with a further increase in the affinity (K_a, 3.2 × 10¹⁰ M⁻¹). This enabled a highly sensitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay capable of detecting up to 0.78 pg/assay. The current study has, thus, focused on the significance of reevaluating the potential of mutagenesis targeting the V_H-CDR3, and encouraging the production and use of engineered antibodies that enable enhanced sensitivities as next-generation diagnostic tools.

To identify patients at a high risk for primary and secondary osteoporotic fractures using fracture risk assessments performed using the current method and the proposed method, in an acute care hospital and to identify departments where high-risk patients are admitted. This retrospective study included patients aged 40–90 years who were hospitalized at Fujita Health University Hospital. We collated the clinical data and prescriptions of all study participants. We also gathered data pertaining to risk factors according to Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX). Of the 1595 patients, the mean number of major osteoporotic fracture risk predicted using FRAX was 11.73%. The department of rheumatology showed the highest fracture risk (18.55 ± 16.81) and had the highest number of patients on medications that resulted in reduced bone mineral density (1.07 ± 0.98 medication). Based on the FRAX, the proportion of patients in the high-risk group in this department was significantly higher compared with those in the remaining departments with respect to glucocorticoid administration, rheumatoid arthritis, and secondary osteoporosis. However, the departments included in the high-risk group were not necessarily the same as the departments included in the top group, based on the administered medications. FRAX score is calculated based on various risk factors; however, only glucocorticoid corresponds to medications. We should focus on medication prescription patterns in addition to FRAX to improve fracture risk assessment in hospital-wide surveillance. Therefore, we recommend the use of FRAX along with the prescribed medications to identify departments that admit high-risk patients.

A model-based, cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted to evaluate the difference in cost-effectiveness of nivolumab (NIVO), between first-line therapy in combination with chemotherapy and third-line or later monotherapy for patients with unresectable, advanced or recurrent gastric or gastro-esophageal junction cancer, with the aim of supporting the economic evaluation of healthcare in Japan. Data on overall survival and progression-free survival were obtained from the phase 3 clinical trials, ATTRACTION-4 and ATTRACTION-2. A partitioned survival model was developed to predict costs and outcomes. Direct medical costs were considered from the perspective of the Japanese national health insurance (NHI) payer. The model time horizon was set to 10 years. Health outcomes were defined as life years (LYs) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of NIVO compared to the control group was estimated. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the uncertainty of parameter setting. A willingness-to-pay threshold of 15 million JPY (Japanese yen) was used. Compared to each control group, the ICERs for NIVO treatment per 1 LY gained were 65745714 JPY for first-line treatment, 7420202 JPY for third-line or later treatment, and 74750097 JPY and 10496602 JPY per QALY gained, respectively. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses estimated that the probability of NIVO treatment being cost-effective for first-line and third-line treatment was 23.5 and 74.3%, respectively. From the perspective of the Japanese NHI payer, NIVO was cost-effective as third-line or later monotherapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer, but not in combination with first-line chemotherapy.