Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin
Online ISSN : 1347-5215
Print ISSN : 0918-6158
ISSN-L : 0918-6158
Regular Articles
Stereoselective Recognition of Amethopterin Enantiomers by the Rat Proton-Coupled Folate Transporter
Tomoya Narawa Toshiaki YanoTomoo Itoh
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS FULL-TEXT HTML

2015 Volume 38 Issue 4 Pages 545-551

Details
Abstract

The stereoselective transport of methotrexate (L-amethopterin, L-MTX) and its enantiomer (D-amethopterin, D-MTX) by the rat proton-coupled folate transporter (rPCFT) were examined using rPCFT-expressing HEK293 cells. The initial rate of uptake of [3H]-L-MTX by the rPCFT followed Michaelis–Menten kinetics, with a Km value of 2.1 µM. Dixon plots revealed that the uptake of L-MTX by the rPCFT was inhibited in a competitive manner by unlabeled L-MTX and D-MTX, with Ki values of approximately 1.3 and 150 µM, respectively. The initial rate of uptake of D-MTX by the rPCFT also followed Michaelis–Menten kinetics, with a Km value of 190 µM. The results of the current study demonstrate that the different enantiomers of MTX are transported in a highly stereoselective manner by the rPCFT, with the uptake clearance of L-MTX being approximately 46-fold greater than that of D-MTX. The observed stereoselectivity of the rPCFT was found to be comparable with that of the human PCFT.

Folates are essential nutrients for cell growth in various mammalian cells and are transported across cell membranes by the reduced folate carrier (RFC, SLC19A1) or the proton-coupled folate transporter (PCFT, SLC46A1).14) The cDNA of the RFC has been cloned in several different species, including mice, hamsters, and humans, and its transport characteristics have been fully elucidated.511) The RFC can only transport reduced folates, with maximal folate transport being observed at neutral pH.2,4,12) Although the PCFT was originally identified as a heme carrier protein, subsequent research revealed that folates are good substrates of the PCFT.3) The PCFT is expressed in the epithelial cells of the small intestine and involved in the absorption of both reduced and oxidized folates, with a H+ gradient providing the driving force for both of these adsorption processes.12) Given that the microclimate pH at the surface of epithelial cells is acidic, the PCFT could also play a major role in the intestinal absorption of folates.

Hereditary folate malabsorption (HFM) is a rare autosomal recessive disorder in humans. This disease is characterized by symptoms similar to those associated with folate deficiency and generally appears within 3–6 months of birth. Infants with HFM develop anemia, diarrhea, immune deficiency, peripheral neuropathies, and seizures.13) Several studies on patients with HFM have revealed a loss of PCFT function due to mutations in the gene encoding the PCFT.14,15) Loss of PCFT function leads to decreased intestinal absorption of folate and reduced folate transport into the central nervous system.14) These findings demonstrate the importance of the role played by the PCFT in intestinal absorption and the distribution of folates to the brain.

Methotrexate (L-amethopterin, L-MTX) is used clinically as an antineoplastic and antirheumatic drug. The molecular structure of L-MTX is similar to that of folic acid (FA), meaning that L-MTX is rapidly absorbed in the small intestine by the PCFT following its oral administration. D-Amethopterin (D-MTX) is the optical isomer of L-MTX, and the absorption of D-MTX from the human small intestine occurs at a significantly slower rate than that of L-MTX. It was reported that the area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC) following the oral administration of L-MTX is approximately 40-fold greater than that of a dose of D-MTX.16)

Our previous studies revealed that the human PCFT (hPCFT)-mediated transport of the different enantiomers of MTX occurred in a stereoselective manner.17) That particular study used hPCFT-expressing human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells to show that both L- and D-MTX were substrates of the hPCFT and that the Km value of L-MTX (4.98 µM) was significantly lower than that of D-MTX (211 µM). The results of that study also revealed that the observed stereoselective transport of MTX occurred as a consequence of significant differences in the affinity of the hPCFT for the various enantiomers of MTX.

The stereoselectivity of the human RFC (hRFC) and rat RFC (rRFC) were investigated in our laboratory. Both L- and D-MTX competitively inhibited the RFC-mediated uptake of [3H]-L-MTX in hRFC-expressing HEK293 cells. The Ki value of D-MTX was approximately 10-fold greater than that of L-MTX, and the hRFC-mediated uptake clearance of L-MTX was 15–30-fold greater than that of D-MTX.18) On the other hand, according to our preliminary results, unlabeled L- and D-MTX both inhibited the uptake of [3H]-L-MTX in a competitive manner with very similar Ki values. Moreover, no differences were observed in the rRFC-mediated uptake clearance between L- and D-MTX. These results demonstrated that there are significant species differences in the stereoselective transport of MTX enantiomers between humans and rats.

Since species differences were observed in the stereoselective transport of MTX via the RFC, the present study aimed to investigate whether there are species differences in the stereoselective transport of the PCFT. Since we established a HEK293 cell line capable of stably expressing the rPCFT, we used this cell line to investigate the stereoselectivity of rPCFT toward the transport of the different enantiomers of MTX.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Materials

L-MTX and 2-[4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethanesulfonic acid (HEPES) were purchased from Nacalai Tesque (Kyoto, Japan). D-MTX was purchased from Kanto Kagaku Co. (Tokyo, Japan). 2-Morpholinoethanesulfonic acid monohydrate (MES) was purchased from Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd. (Osaka, Japan). [3H]-L-MTX (specific activity, 31 Ci/mmol) was purchased from Moravek Biochemicals, Inc. (Brea, CA, U.S.A.) and used without further purification. All other chemicals used in the study were purchased as the highest available grade.

Construction of Stably Transfected HEK293 Cells Expressing the rPCFT

Male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats were purchased from Japan SLC (Hamamatsu, Japan). Animal experiments were approved by the Kitasato University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and were performed in accordance with the Regulations for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals in Kitasato University. Total RNA from the small intestinal mucosa of male SD rats was isolated using Sepasol RNA I super according to the manufacturer’s (Nacalai Tesque) protocol. The concentration of RNA was determined by absorbance at 260/280 nm. A small portion (1 µg) of the total RNA was heat denatured with 1 µL of random primer at 70°C for 5 min, placed on ice for 1 min, and then mixed with 5 µL of Moloney murine leukemia virus (M-MLV) Reverse Transcriptase 5× Reaction Buffer, 1.5 µL of 10 mM deoxyribonucleotide triphosphate (dNTP) mixture, and 0.2 µL of M-MLV reverse transcriptase (Promega, Madison, WI, U.S.A.). The mixture was then incubated at 37°C for 60 min, followed by incubation at 70°C for 15 min. The following oligonucleotide primers were used in the experiments: rPCFT/EcoRI 5′-GAATTCGCG CAT GGA GGG GCG CGT GA-3′ (forward primer) and rPCFT/XbaI 5′-GCTCTAGATGG CTT CTG GCA GCT CAG GA-3′ (reverse primer). The reaction mixture (50 µL) contained 1 µL of reverse transcription product as the template DNA, 10 pmol of the forward and reverse primers, 10 nmol of the dNTP mixture, 10× High Fidelity PCR Buffer, and 1 unit of Platinum Taq DNA Polymerase High Fidelity. After an initial period of denaturation at 90°C for 2 min, the targeted nucleotides were amplified for 40 cycles, with denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 55°C for 30 s, extension at 72°C for 2 min, and a final extension stage at 72°C for 10 min. The amplified cDNA product was subcloned into a pGEM-T Easy vector (Promega) and transferred into a mammalian expression vector, pcDNA3.1(+) (Invitrogen Co., Grand Island, NY, U.S.A.).

rPCFT-expressing HEK293 cells and control cells (Mock) were constructed by transfecting the HEK293 cells with the expression vector described above or a control pcDNA3.1 vector, respectively, using FuGENE6 (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, U.S.A.) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The tranformants were selected using 600 µg/mL of antibiotic G418 sulfate (Nacalai Tesque) over a 2-week period. An uptake study was conducted using several clones, and the clone with the highest uptake activity was selected for use in the following experiments.

Cell Culture

HEK293 cells were obtained from the Cell Resource Center for Biomedical Research, Tohoku University (Sendai, Japan). The cells were maintained at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2 in a culture medium consisting of Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), 100 U/mL of penicillin, 100 µg/mL of streptomycin, and 10% fetal bovine serum.

rPCFT-HEK293 cells and HEK293-Mock cells were grown in DMEM containing 100 U/mL of penicillin, 100 µg/mL of streptomycin, 600 µg/mL of antibiotic G418 sulfate, and 10% fetal bovine serum. The cells were seeded in multiple-well plates coated with poly-D-lysine at a density of 1.0×105 cells/well.

Uptake Study

Hank’s balanced salt solution (HBSS: 145 mM NaCl, 3 mM KCl, 1 mM CaCl2, 0.5 mM MgCl2) containing 5 mM D-glucose and 5 mM MES (pH 6.0) was used as the uptake medium. HBSS containing 5 mM D-glucose and 5 mM HEPES (pH 7.4) was used as the rinse medium.

The rPCFT-HEK293 cells and HEK293-Mock cells used in the uptake study were placed in multiple-well plates and rinsed twice before being preincubated with the rinse medium (pH 7.4) for 10 min at 37°C. Uptake was initiated by adding 0.5 mL of the preincubated drug solution. Uptake medium (pH 6.0) containing [3H]-L-MTX, unlabeled L-MTX, or D-MTX was used as the drug solution. The drug solution was aspirated for the appropriate length of time necessary to terminate the uptake. The cells were rinsed twice with ice-cold rinse medium (pH 7.4) and then lysed with 1 mL of 0.1% Triton X-100. To determine the uptake amount of [3H]-L-MTX, a 0.8-mL aliquot of the cell lysate was transferred to a scintillation vial, where it was treated with 5 mL of Clear-sol I (Nacalai Tesque). The radioactivity of the resulting solution was measured by liquid scintillation counting. To determine the uptake amount of D-MTX, a 0.8-mL aliquot of the cell lysate was treated with 0.8 mL of acetonitrile, and the resulting mixture was vortexed. The vortexed mixture was then centrifuged at 825×g for 15 min, and the supernatant was filtered using a Cosmonice filter S (0.45 µm; Nacalai Tesque). The filtrate was dried under a gentle stream of nitrogen gas at 80°C to give a residue, which was dissolved in 100 µL of the mobile phase. A 30-µL aliquot was injected into the LC-MS/MS system, which was operated under a previously published set of conditions.17)

For the inhibition study, each inhibitor was added to the drug solution at an appropriate concentration, and the uptake of the drug was measured in the same manner as that described above. The drugs and inhibitors were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and the final concentration of DMSO in the drug solution was 1% or less in each case.

Protein Assay

For protein determination, the rPCFT-HEK293 and HEK293-Mock cells were dissolved in 1 mL of 0.1% Triton X-100, and the protein concentrations were determined using a Bio-Rad protein assay kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond, CA, U.S.A.) with bovine serum albumin as a standard.

Data Analysis

The kinetic parameters for the uptake of L-MTX and D-MTX uptake were calculated, and the resulting data were fitted to the following equation using a nonlinear least-squares method19):   

(1)
where v is the carrier-mediated initial uptake rate, Vmax is the maximum uptake rate, Km is the Michaelis constant, and [S] is the initial concentration of the drug.

RESULTS

Uptake of L-MTX

Figure 1 shows the time courses for the uptake of 0.02 µM of [3H]-L-MTX into the rPCFT-HEK293 and Mock cells. The uptake into the rPCFT-HEK293 cells was significantly higher than that into the Mock cells. Based on the results in Fig. 1, the initial rate of uptake was calculated from the uptake amount at 1 min, which was determined according to the following analyses.

Fig. 1. Time Course of the Uptake of 0.02 µM of L-MTX at an Extracellular pH of 6.0

Each point represents the mean±S.D. of three determinations. ●, rPCFT-transfected HEK293 cells; ○, vector-transfected HEK293 cells (Mock).

The initial uptake rate of [3H]-L-MTX was measured at variety of different concentrations (0.5–40 µM) in the presence of a H+ gradient (pH 6.0). The amount of rPCFT-mediated uptake was calculated by subtracting the uptake into Mock cells from that into rPCFT-HEK293 cells. The results of this analysis are shown in Figs. 2A and B. Single-component analysis gave Km=2.14±0.22 µM and Vmax=260±12 pmol/min/mg protein [mean±standard deviation (S.D.), n=3] with an Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC) value of −21.3. The following uptake parameters were obtained when the data were analyzed with two components: Km,1=1.22±0.84 µM; Vmax,1=159±118 pmol/min/mg protein; Km,2=11.5±21.0 µM; and Vmax,2=145±86 pmol/min/mg protein (mean±S.D., n=3). The AIC value for two-component analysis was −24.1.

Fig. 2. Concentration Dependence of the Initial Rate of Uptake of rPCFT-Mediated L-MTX Uptake (A) Eadie–Hofstee Plot of the rPCFT-Mediated Uptake of L-MTX (B)

Each point represents the mean±S.D. of three determinations. The rPCFT-mediated uptake was calculated by subtracting the uptake into Mock cells from that into rPCFT-HEK293 cells.

Inhibition Studies

The initial uptake rates of 0.4, 0.8, and 2 µM of [3H]-L-MTX were measured in the presence of 0, 1, and 2 µM of unlabeled L-MTX, and the resulting data were analyzed using a Dixon plot (Fig. 3A). Unlabeled L-MTX competitively inhibited [3H]-L-MTX uptake, with a Ki value of 1.25 µM. The initial uptake rates of 0.4, 0.8, and 2 µM of [3H]-L-MTX were also measured in the presence of 0, 150, and 300 µM of D-MTX. A Dixon plot of the resulting data showed that D-MTX inhibited the uptake of [3H]-L-MTX in a competitive manner, with a Ki value of 149 µM (Fig. 3B).

Fig. 3. Dixon Plots of the Inhibitory Effects of Unlabeled L-MTX and D-MTX on the rPCFT-Mediated Uptake of [3H]-L-MTX

The uptake values were measured at 0.4 (●), 0.8 (■), and 2.0 (▲) µM in the presence of 0, 1, and 2 µM of L-MTX (A); and 0, 150, and 300 µM of D-MTX (B). Each point represents the mean±S.D. of three determinations.

Uptake of D-MTX

Figure 4 shows the time courses for the uptake of 20 µM of D-MTX into the rPCFT-HEK293 and Mock cells. The uptake of D-MTX into rPCFT-HEK293 cells was significantly higher than that into Mock cells. Based on the results shown in Fig. 4, the initial uptake rate was calculated from the uptake amount at 2 min according to the following analyses.

Fig. 4. Time Course of the Uptake of 20 µM of D-MTX at an Extracellular pH of 6.0

Each point represents the mean±S.D. of three determinations. ●, rPCFT-transfected HEK293 cells; ○, vector-transfected HEK293 cells (Mock).

The initial rate of uptake of D-MTX was measured at a variety of different concentrations (20–600 µM) in the presence of a H+ gradient (pH 6.0). The rPCFT-mediated uptake was calculated by subtracting the uptake into Mock cells from that into rPCFT-HEK293 cells, and the results are shown in Fig. 5A. An Eadie–Hofstee plot of the rPCFT-mediated uptake indicated that the saturable uptake of D-MTX was mediated by a single transport system (Fig. 5B). The AIC value of one-component analysis was determined to be −9.91, whereas the value obtained from the two-component analysis was −5.97. The uptake parameters were calculated using Eq. 1, which gave the following values: Km=192±55 µM; and Vmax=509±88 pmol/min/mg protein (mean±S.D., n=3).

Fig. 5. Concentration Dependence of the Initial Rate of Uptake for rPCFT-Mediated D-MTX Uptake (A) Eadie–Hofstee Plot of rPCFT-Mediated Uptake of D-MTX (B)

Each point represents the mean±S.D. of three determinations. The rPCFT-mediated uptake was calculated by subtracting the uptake into Mock cells from that into rPCFT-HEK293 cells.

Comparison of L- and D-MTX Uptake

The rates of uptake of 0.2 µM of [3H]-L-MTX and 20 µM of D-MTX into rPCFT-HEK293 and Mock cells were measured at pH 6.0. The uptake times of L-MTX and D-MTX were 1 and 2 min, respectively. The uptake of [3H]-L-MTX was measured by liquid scintillation counting, whereas the uptake of D-MTX was measured by LC-MS/MS. It is noteworthy that there were no discernible differences in the uptake amounts of L-MTX measured by liquid scintillation counting and LC-MS/MS (data not shown). The uptake of [3H]-L-MTX could therefore be reliably compared with that of D-MTX. The initial uptake rates of L- and D-MTX are shown in Fig. 6.

Fig. 6. Uptake Values of 0.2 µM of L-MTX and 20 µM of D-MTX

The uptake of L-MTX was measured for 1 min and that of D-MTX for 2 min in both cell types. Inset, magnified image of L-MTX uptake into Mock cells; ■, rPCFT-transfected HEK293 cells; □, vector-transfected HEK293 cells (Mock). Each column represents the mean±S.D. of three determinations.

The rate of carrier-mediated uptake was calculated by subtracting the uptake into Mock cells from that into rPCFT-expressing cells, and the uptake clearance was then calculated by dividing the rate of carrier-mediated uptake by the initial concentration of the substrate (i.e., 0.2 µM for L-MTX and 20 µM for D-MTX). The rPCFT-mediated uptake clearances of L- and D-MTX were determined to be 124±5.6 and 3.27±0.43 µL/min/mg protein (mean ±S.D., n=3), respectively, which indicated that the uptake of L-MTX was approximately 40-fold greater than that of D-MTX.

DISCUSSION

In our previous study, we demonstrated that the stereoselective absorption of L- and D-MTX occurred as a consequence of the stereoselective transport of the different enantiomers by human PCFT (hPCFT).17) In that study, hPCFT-expressing cells were used to show that L- and D-MTX are both substrates of the hPCFT and that the affinity of D-MTX (Km: 211 µM) for this transporter is about 40-fold less than that of L-MTX (Km: 4.98 µM). The results of that study also revealed that the significant difference in the affinity of the MTX enantiomers for the hPCFT resulted in their stereoselective absorption. It was reported that there is a correlation between the polar surface area (PSA) and intestinal absorption, and that the drugs with PSA>140 Å2 are poorly absorbed only via passive diffusion.20) Although MTX has a high PSA value (approximately 200 Å2), the intestinal absorption of MTX is almost 100%. These observations strongly support the idea that the absorption of MTX from the small intestine occurs mainly via transport by the PCFT.

In the current study, HEK293 cells stably expressing the rPCFT were established to confirm the species differences between rats and humans. In this experiment, the uptake of D-MTX had to be measured by LC-MS/MS analysis because isotope-labeled D-MTX was not available from a commercial supplier. Furthermore, since no difference was observed between the measurements obtained using liquid scintillation counting and LC-MS/MS methods, L-MTX was measured using a radioisotope.

Although the AIC value in two-component analysis of L-MTX was slightly smaller than that observed in single-component analysis, the standard deviations of the parameters obtained in two-component analysis were much greater than those obtained in single-component analysis. Furthermore, the hPCFT-mediated uptake of L- and D-MTX showed a single component in our previous study,17) and the uptake of D-MTX by the rPCFT in the current study was also a single component. The decision was therefore taken to use the Km value obtained from single-component analysis to allow for the most effective comparison of the stereoselectivity of the rPCFT toward the transport of the different enantiomers of MTX.

The Km value (2.14 µM) determined for L-MTX in the current study was found to be similar to those reported previously in a range of different systems, including 0.6–2.6 µM in HepG2 cells transfected with rPCFT cDNA,21) 5.7 µM in Xenopus oocytes injected with rPCFT cRNA,22) and 1.0–4.6 µM in HepG2 cells transfected with mouse PCFT cDNA.21)

The Dixon plot showed that the uptake of L-MTX was inhibited in a competitive manner by unlabeled L-MTX, which gave a Ki value of 1.25 µM. It is noteworthy that this Ki value is almost equal to the Km value (2.14 µM) of L-MTX. D-MTX also inhibited the uptake of L-MTX in a competitive manner, with a Ki value of 149 µM. Taken together, these results clearly demonstrate that the affinity of D-MTX for the rPCFT is approximately 120-fold less than that of L-MTX.

The Km value (192 µM) for the uptake of D-MTX was almost equal to its Ki value (149 µM). Once again, a comparison of the Km values between L-MTX (2.14 µM) and D-MTX (192 µM) revealed that the affinity of L-MTX for the PCFT was approximately 90-fold greater than that of D-MTX.

The PCFT-mediated uptake clearance values of L-MTX and D-MTX were calculated as Vmax/Km, which gave values of 121 and 2.65 µL/min/mg protein, respectively. The ratio of the rPCFT-mediated uptake clearance of L-MTX to that of D-MTX was therefore 46. In our previous study using hPCFT-expressing cells,17) the PCFT-mediated uptake clearance values of L-MTX and D-MTX were 179 and 4.31 µL/min/mg protein, respectively, and the ratio of the hPCFT-mediated uptake clearance of L-MTX to that of D-MTX was 42. These results therefore demonstrated that there was very little difference between the uptake clearance ratios of the MTX enantiomers in the rPCFT and hPCFT.

Qiu et al.21) also reported the results of their study on the stereoselectivity of PCFTs from rats and mice. In their study, both rat and mouse PCFTs showed a significant difference in the inhibitory activities between (6S)- and (6R)-5-formyltetrahydrofolate against the uptake of FA. Qiu et al.21) also estimated that there was an approximate six-fold difference in the affinity of the enantiomers for both rPCFT and mouse PCFT, and their observations showed similar stereoselectivity between the two PCFTs. In a separate study, Menter et al.23) reported that the hPCFT-mediated uptake of the different enantiomers of aminopterin (AMT) occurred in a stereoselective manner, and that the Vmax/Km value of L-AMT was approximately 35-fold greater than that of D-AMT.

Species differences have been reported for several other transporters. For example, the transport of kynurenic acid by organic anion transporter 1 (OAT1, SLC22A6) and OAT3 (SLC22A8) was examined, and no differences were observed in the affinity of kynurenic acid for OAT1 and OAT3 between humans and rats.24,25) The Km values for the interaction of kynurenic acid with human and rat OAT1 were 5.06 and 8.46 µM, respectively. The Km values for the interaction of kynurenic acid with human and rat OAT3 were almost identical (approximately 4.8 µM). The Na+-dependent taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide (NTCP, SLC10A1), which is a major transporter of bile acids in hepatocytes, showed species differences in terms of its inhibition by bosentan.26) Taurocholate uptake was inhibited in a competitive manner by bosentan in the human NTCP with a Ki value of 18 µM, whereas the uptake of taurocholate was inhibited in a noncompetitive manner by bosentan in the rat NTCP. Multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 (MRP2, ABCC2) transports a variety of different drug molecules and metabolites, including glutathione, glucuronide, and sulfate conjugates, across extra- and intracellular membranes. Takekuma et al.27) investigated the inhibitory effects of the mycophenolic acid glucuronide (MPAG) metabolite on the transport of p-aminohippuric acid and found that MPAG gave IC50 values of 286 and 1036 µM for rat and human MRP2, respectively. The results demonstrated that the affinity of MPAG to rat MRP2 is 3.6-fold greater than that to human MRP2.

The results of the current study showed that the rPCFT-mediated transport of the different enantiomers of MTX occurs with a high degree of stereoselectivity. Furthermore, the stereoselectivity of the rPCFT was found to be comparable to that of the hPCFT. We showed that there are no species differences in substrate recognition of PCFT between humans and rats. The present observations indicate that rats may be a good model to predict carrier-mediated intestinal absorption of folates and their analogues in humans.

According to our observations, species differences are seen in the stereoselectivity of the RFC between humans and rats. The hRFC exhibited a high level of stereoselectivity toward the different enantiomers of MTX, whereas the rRFC showed almost no stereoselectivity. The hPCFT and rPCFT proteins share 87% amino acid identity, and the hRFC and rRFC proteins share only 64% amino acid identity. Since PCFT proteins are highly conserved between humans and rats, this may result in the similar structure of the substrate recognition site and similar stereoselectivity.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

REFERENCES
 
© 2015 The Pharmaceutical Society of Japan
feedback
Top