Comparison of Forest Value and Use among Regions Using Simple Quantitative Indices

Abstract

Biodiversity-based forest value and use were compared among regions and between natural forests and tree plantations using simple indices that were based on signs and cars parked along roads. Comparison between the two methods yielded similar regional differences. Observation frequency on non-timber forest products was high in Okuaizu and natural forests in Abukuma. That on fishing was observed only in Okuaizu and Abukuma and more than half of those on recreation were observed in Tsukuba and Okinawa/Amami. Frequency on nature conservation was highest in Okinawa/ Amami. In tree plantations frequency was low except for forestry and fishing compared with natural forests. These findings suggest the necessity of differentiating policy directions according to regional differences.