Circulation Journal
Online ISSN : 1347-4820
Print ISSN : 1346-9843
ISSN-L : 1346-9843
Arrhythmia/Electrophysiology
Anticoagulation Management in the Perioperative Phase of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Implantation
Hisashi YokoshikiHirofumi MitsuyamaMasaya WatanabeKazuya MizukamiYoshiro MatsuiHiroyuki Tsutsui
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS

2013 Volume 77 Issue 8 Pages 2003-2008

Details
Abstract
Background: According to the current guidelines, substitution of warfarin with heparin is recommended as perioperative management in patients with high risk of thromboembolism. Optimal management of oral anticoagulation in patients undergoing implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation, however, remains controversial. Methods and Results: Bleeding complications among 273 consecutive patients undergoing initial ICD implantation were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were grouped according to medication at the time of device implantation: neither antiplatelet nor anticoagulation (N group, n=121); antiplatelet only (AP group, n=59); warfarin (W group, n=59); and heparin bridging (H group, n=34). The rate of the major bleeding complications, defined as hematoma requiring reoperation, cardiac tamponade, and pericardial effusion requiring additional hospital stay, was 1.7% in the N group, 0% in the AP group, 5.1% in the W group, and 17.6% in the H group (P<0.001, N group vs. H group). After multivariate adjustment, heparin bridging was a significant predictor of major bleeding complications (odds ratio, 7.44; 95% confidence interval: 2.06–26.89; P=0.0022). The international normalized ratio of 3 patients in the W group with major bleeding complications was 1.98±0.10, and was significantly higher than in patients without them (1.31±0.05, n=26, P<0.001). Conclusions: Heparin bridging increased the risk of bleeding complications at the time of ICD implantation.  (Circ J 2013; 77: 2003–2008)
Content from these authors
© 2013 THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top