Circulation Journal
Online ISSN : 1347-4820
Print ISSN : 1346-9843
ISSN-L : 1346-9843
Arrhythmia/Electrophysiology
Clinical and Electrophysiological Characteristics of Typical Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia in the Elderly – Changing of Slow Pathway Location With Aging –
Yusuf I. AlihanogluBekir S. YildizDogu I. KilicHarun EvrengulSedat Kose
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS FULL-TEXT HTML

2015 Volume 79 Issue 5 Pages 1031-1036

Details
Abstract
Background:The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the clinical and electrophysiological characteristics of elderly patients with typical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), and to assess the acute safety and efficacy of slow-pathway radiofrequency (RF) ablation in this specific group of patients.Methods and Results:The present study retrospectively included a total of 1,290 patients receiving successful slow-pathway RF ablation for typical slow-fast AVNRT. Patients were divided into 2 groups: group I included 1,148 patients aged <65 years and group II included 142 patients aged >65 years. The required total procedure duration and total fluoroscopy exposure time were significantly higher in group II vs. group I (P=0.005 and P=0.0001, respectively). The number of RF pulses needed for a successful procedural end-point was significantly higher in group II than in group I (4.4 vs. 7.2, P=0.005). While the ratio of the anterior location near to the His-bundle region was significantly higher in group II, the ratio of posterior and midseptal locations were significantly higher in group I (P=0.0001). The overall procedure success rates were similar. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in respect of the complications rates.Conclusions:This experience demonstrates that RF catheter ablation, targeting the slow pathway, could be considered as first-line therapy for typical AVNRT patients older than 65 years as well as younger patients, as it is very safe and effective in the acute period of treatment. (Circ J 2015; 79: 1031–1036)
Content from these authors
© 2015 THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top