Circulation Journal
Online ISSN : 1347-4820
Print ISSN : 1346-9843
ISSN-L : 1346-9843
Valvular Heart Disease
Prognostic Significance of ST-Segment Elevation in Leads V1–2 in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis
Tomohiko TaniguchiHiroki ShiomiMasami KosugeTakeshi MorimotoKenji NakatsumaMasataka NishigaTomoki SasaNaritatsu SaitoTakeshi Kimura
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS FULL-TEXT HTML
Supplementary material

2016 Volume 80 Issue 2 Pages 526-534

Details
Abstract
Background:ST-segment elevation (STE) in leads V1–2is often observed in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS), but its significance remains unknown.Methods and Results:We retrospectively evaluated baseline ECGs and 5-year clinical outcomes in 211 consecutive patients with severe AS, defined as peak aortic jet velocity (Aortic Vmax) >4.0 m/s, or mean aortic pressure gradient >40 mmHg, or aortic valve area (AVA) <1.0 cm2. The primary outcome measure was a composite of death or surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR). Patients with STE in leads V1–2(≥0.15 mV) had greater Aortic Vmaxand smaller AVA than patients without. With a median follow-up of 4.9 years, the cumulative 5-year incidence of death or AVR was significantly higher in patients with STE in leads V1–2than in patients without (91.4% vs. 77.1%; P=0.003). After adjusting for confounders, STE in leads V1–2was independently associated with higher risk for death or AVR (hazard ratio, 1.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.06–2.22; P=0.02). In 64 asymptomatic patients without any indication for AVR at initial diagnosis of severe AS, the cumulative incidence of AVR was significantly higher in patients with STE in leads V1–2than in patients without (57.6% vs. 30.5%; P<0.001).Conclusions:STE in leads V1–2independently predicted poorer prognosis and more frequent need for AVR in patients with severe AS. (Circ J 2016; 80: 526–534)
Content from these authors
© 2016 THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top