Circulation Journal
Online ISSN : 1347-4820
Print ISSN : 1346-9843
ISSN-L : 1346-9843
Ischemic Heart Disease
Stent Fracture and Peri-Stent Contrast Staining After Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation ― 5-Year Outcomes ―
Katsuya MiuraTakeshi TadaAkinune KuwayamaTakenobu ShimadaMasanobu OhyaHidewo AmanoShunsuke KuboYusuke HyodoSuguru OtsuruSeiji HabaraHiroyuki TanakaYasushi FukuTsuyoshi GotoKazushige Kadota
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS FULL-TEXT HTML
Supplementary material

2017 Volume 81 Issue 10 Pages 1514-1521

Details
Abstract

Background:Stent fracture (SF) and peri-stent contrast staining (PSS) after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation are reported to be risk factors of adverse events. However, the effect of these after everolimus-eluting stent (EES) implantation on long-term outcomes remains unclear.

Methods and Results:The study sample comprised 636 patients (1,081 lesions) undergoing EES implantation in 2010 and follow-up angiography within 1 year. The 5-year cumulative rates of target lesion revascularization (TLR) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE: a combination of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and TLR) were compared between patients with and without SF or PSS. SF was observed in 2.7%, and PSS in 3.0%. The cumulative rates of MACE and TLR were significantly higher in the SF group than in the non-SF group (51.7% vs. 27.5% and 48.3% vs. 13.4%, respectively), but showed no significant differences between the PSS and non-PSS groups. In a landmark analysis, the rate of TLR within 1 year was significantly higher in the SF group than in the non-SF group (44.8% vs. 7.2%), but beyond 1 year showed no significant difference (6.3% vs 6.7%).

Conclusions:The 5-year clinical outcomes suggested that SF after EES implantation is related to increased risk of MACE and TLR, especially within 1 year after the procedure, but PSS after EES implantation is unrelated.

Content from these authors
© 2017 THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top