Circulation Journal
Online ISSN : 1347-4820
Print ISSN : 1346-9843
ISSN-L : 1346-9843
Preventive Medicine
Effect of Intensive and Standard Pitavastatin Treatment With or Without Eicosapentaenoic Acid on Progression of Coronary Artery Calcification Over 12 Months ― Prospective Multicenter Study ―
Toru MiyoshiKunihisa KohnoHirohiko AsonumaSatoru SakuragiMakoto NakahamaYusuke KawaiTadahisa UesugiTakefumi OkaMitsuru MunemasaNatsuki TakahashiNaoki MukoharaSeiji HabaraYasushi KoyamaKazufumi NakamuraHiroshi Itoon behalf of the PEACH Investigators
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS FULL-TEXT HTML
Supplementary material

2018 Volume 82 Issue 2 Pages 532-540

Details
Abstract

Background:The effect of lipid-lowering agents on progression of coronary artery calcification (CAC) remains unclear. We evaluated the effects of pitavastatin 2 mg/day (PIT2), pitavastatin 4 mg/day (PIT4), and PIT2 combined with eicosapentaenoic acid (PIT2+EPA) on CAC progression.

Methods and Results:This prospective multicenter study in Japan included patients with an Agatston score of 1–999, hypercholesterolemia, and no evidence of cardiovascular disease. Patients were allocated into PIT2, PIT4, or PIT2+EPA groups. The primary outcome was the annual percent change in Agatston score in all patients. In total, 156 patients who had multi-detector row computed tomography without any artifacts were included in the primary analysis. Pitavastatin did not significantly reduce the annual progression rate of the Agatston score (40%; 95% CI: 19–61%). The annual progression rate of Agatston score in the PIT2 group was not significantly different from that in the PIT4 group (34% vs. 42%, respectively; P=0.88) or the PIT2+EPA group (34% vs. 44%, respectively; P=0.80). On post-hoc analysis the baseline ratio of low- to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol was a significant predictor of non-progression of Agatston score by pitavastatin (OR, 2.17; 95% CI: 1.10–44.12; P=0.02).

Conclusions:Pitavastatin does not attenuate progression of CAC. Intensive pitavastatin treatment and standard treatment with EPA does not reduce progression of CAC compared with standard treatment.

Content from these authors
© 2018 THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top