Circulation Journal
Online ISSN : 1347-4820
Print ISSN : 1346-9843
ISSN-L : 1346-9843
Cardiovascular Intervention
Second-Generation vs. First-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients With Calcified Coronary Lesions ― Pooled Analysis From the RESET and NEXT Trials ―
Koji NishidaKenji NakatsumaHiroki ShiomiMasahiro NatsuakiKazuya KawaiTakeshi MorimotoKen KozumaKeiichi IgarashiKazushige KadotaKengo TanabeYoshihiro MorinoKiyoshi HibiTakashi AkasakaMitsuru AbeSatoru SuwaToshiya MuramatsuMasakazu KobayashiKazuoki DaiKoichi NakaoYasuhiro TarutaniKenshi FujiiTakeshi Kimuraon behalf of the RESET and NEXT Investigators
Author information
JOURNALS FREE ACCESS FULL-TEXT HTML
Supplementary material

2018 Volume 82 Issue 2 Pages 376-387

Details
Abstract

Background:The comparative efficacy of second-generation (G2) vs. first-generation (G1) drug-eluting stents (DES) for calcified coronary lesions is unknown.

Methods and Results:We compared the 3-year clinical outcomes of patients with G1- or G2-DES according to the presence or absence of calcified coronary lesions as assessed in an angiographic core laboratory using data from 2 large-scale prospective multicenter randomized trials, RESET and NEXT. G1-DES and G2-DES were implanted in 299 and 1,033 patients, respectively, in the Calc stratum (≥1 lesion with moderate/severe calcification), and 1,208 and 3,550 patients, respectively, in the Non-calc stratum (no/mild calcification). The patients in the Calc stratum had a significantly higher adjusted risk for the primary outcome measure (any target-lesion revascularization (TLR)) than those in the Non-calc stratum (HR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.11–1.71, P=0.004). The cumulative 3-year incidence of any TLR was not significantly different between the G1-DES and G2-DES groups in both the Calc and Non-calc strata (12.1% vs. 9.7%, P=0.22, and 6.8% vs. 6.1%, P=0.44, respectively). After adjusting for confounders, the effect of G2DES relative to G1-DES for any TLR remained insignificant in both the Calc and Non-calc strata (HR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.48–1.25, P=0.3, and HR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.61–1.17, P=0.31, respectively, P interaction=0.55).

Conclusions:The effect of G2-DES relative to G1-DES for TLR was not significantly different regardless of the presence or absence of lesion calcification.

Information related to the author
© 2018 THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top