Circulation Journal
Online ISSN : 1347-4820
Print ISSN : 1346-9843
ISSN-L : 1346-9843
Population Science
Long-Term Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Initially Conservatively Managed Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis
Xiaoyang SongNaritatsu SaitoTakeshi MorimotoTomohiko TaniguchiHiroki ShiomiKenji AndoKazuya NagaoNorio KanamoriKoichiro MurataTakeshi KitaiYuichi KawaseChisato IzumiMakoto MiyakeHirokazu MitsuokaMasashi KatoYutaka HiranoShintaro MatsudaTsukasa InadaTomoyuki MurakamiYasuyo TakeuchiKeiichiro YamaneMamoru ToyofukuMitsuru IshiiEri Minamino-MutaTakao KatoYusuke YoshikawaMoriaki InokoTomoyuki IkedaKatsuhisa IshiiKozo HottaNobuya HigashitaniYoshihiro KatoYasutaka InuzukaChiyo MaedaToshikazu JinnaiYuko MorikamiKenji MinatoyaTakeshi Kimuraon behalf of the CURRENT AS Registry Investigators
Author information
JOURNAL OPEN ACCESS FULL-TEXT HTML
Supplementary material

2021 Volume 85 Issue 7 Pages 1083-1092

Details
Abstract

Background:Although diabetes mellitus (DM) is a common comorbidity of aortic stenosis (AS), clinical evidence about the long-term effect of DM on patients with AS is insufficient.

Methods and Results:Data were acquired from CURRENT AS, a large Japanese multicenter registry that enrolled 3,815 patients with severe AS. Patients without initial valve replacement were defined as the conservative group; among them, 621 (23.4%) had DM, whereas 1997 did not. The DM group was further divided into 2 groups according to insulin treatment (insulin-treated DM, n=130; non-insulin treated DM, n=491). The primary outcome was a composite of aortic valve (AV)-related death and heart failure (HF) hospitalization. Secondary outcomes were AV-related death, HF hospitalization, all-cause death, cardiovascular death, sudden death, and surgical or transcatheter AV replacement during follow up. As a result, DM was associated with higher risk for the primary outcome (52.8% vs. 42.9%, P<0.001), with a statistically significant adjusted hazard ratio (HR 1.33, 95% confidence interval: 1.14–1.56, P<0.001). All secondary outcomes were not significantly different between DM and non-DM patients after adjusting for confounding factors, except for HF hospitalization. Insulin use was not associated with higher incidence of primary or secondary outcome.

Conclusions:In initially conservatively managed patients with AS, DM was independently associated with higher risk for a composite of AV-related death or HF hospitalization; however, insulin use was not associated with poor outcomes.

Content from these authors
© 2021, THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons [Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International] license.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top