Circulation Journal
Online ISSN : 1347-4820
Print ISSN : 1346-9843
ISSN-L : 1346-9843
Population Science
Concomitant Mitral Regurgitation in Severe Aortic Stenosis ― Insights From the CURRENT AS Registry-2 ―
Yuki ObayashiYasuaki TakejiTomohiko TaniguchiTakeshi MorimotoShinichi ShiraiTakeshi KitaiHiroyuki TabataNobuhisa OhnoRyosuke MuraiKohei OsakadaKoichiro MurataMasanao NakaiHiroshi TsuneyoshiTomohisa TadaMasashi AmanoShin WatanabeHiroki ShiomiHirotoshi WatanabeYusuke YoshikawaRyusuke NishikawaKo YamamotoMamoru ToyofukuShojiro TatsushimaNorio KanamoriMakoto MiyakeHiroyuki NakayamaKazuya NagaoMasayasu IzuharaKenji NakatsumaMoriaki InokoTakanari FujitaMasahiro KimuraMitsuru IshiiShunsuke UsamiFumiko NakazekiKiyonori TogiYasutaka InuzukaKenji AndoTatsuhiko KomiyaKoh OnoKenji MinatoyaTakeshi Kimura on behalf of the CURRENT AS Registry-2 Investigators
Author information
JOURNAL OPEN ACCESS FULL-TEXT HTML
Supplementary material

2024 Volume 88 Issue 12 Pages 1996-2007

Details
Abstract

Background: Data on concomitant mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) are scarce.

Methods and Results: We investigated the risk of concomitant MR in patients with severe AS in the CURRENT AS Registry-2 according to initial treatment strategy (transcatheter aortic valve implantation [TAVI], surgical aortic valve replacement [SAVR], or conservative). Among 3,365 patients with severe AS, 384 (11.4%) had moderate/severe MR (TAVI: n=126/1,148; SAVR: n=68/591; conservative: n=190/1,626). The cumulative 3-year incidence for death or heart failure (HF) hospitalization was significantly higher in the moderate/severe than no/mild MR group in the entire population (54.6% vs. 34.3%, respectively; P<0.001) and for each treatment strategy (TAVI: 45.0% vs. 31.8% [P=0.006]; SAVR: 31.9% vs. 18.7% [P<0.001]; conservative: 67.8% vs. 41.6% [P<0.001]). The higher adjusted risk of moderate/severe MR relative to no/mild MR for death or HF hospitalization was not significant in the entire population (hazard ratio [HR] 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.95–1.39; P=0.15); however, the risk was significant in the SAVR (HR 1.92; 95% CI 1.04–3.56; P=0.04) and conservative (HR 1.30; 95% CI 1.02–1.67; P=0.04) groups, but not in the TAVI group (HR 1.03; 95% CI 0.70–1.52; P=0.86), despite no significant interaction (Pinteraction=0.37).

Conclusions: Moderate/severe MR was associated with a higher risk for death or HF hospitalization in the initial SAVR and conservative strategies, while the association was less pronounced in the initial TAVI strategy.

Content from these authors
© 2024, THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons [Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International] license.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top