Circulation Journal
Online ISSN : 1347-4820
Print ISSN : 1346-9843
ISSN-L : 1346-9843

This article has now been updated. Please use the final version.

Comparison of Different Antithrombotic Regimens for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation
Fei GaoYu Jie ZhouZhi Jian WangHua ShenXiao Li LiuBin NieZhen Xian YanShi Wei YangDe An JiaMiao Yu
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS Advance online publication

Article ID: CJ-09-0880

Details
Abstract

Background: The optimal antithrombotic strategy for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation is unknown. Methods and Results: The 622 consecutive AF patients undergoing DES implantation were prospectively enrolled. Among them, 142 patients (TT group) continued triple antithrombotic therapy comprising aspirin, clopidogrel and warfarin after discharge; 355 patients (DT group) had dual antiplatelet therapy; 125 patients (WS group) were discharged with warfarin and a single antiplatelet agent. Target INR was set as 1.8-2.5 and was regularly monitored after discharge. The TT group had a significant reduction in stroke and major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCE) (8.8% vs 20.1% vs 14.9%, P=0.010) as compared with either the DT or WS group. In the Cox regression analysis, administration with warfarin (hazard ratio (HR) 0.49; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31-0.77; P=0.002) and baseline CHADS2 score ≥2 (HR 2.09; 95%CI 1.27-3.45; P=0.004) were independent predictors of MACCE. Importantly, the incidence of major bleeding was comparable among 3 groups (2.9% vs 1.8% vs 2.5%, P=0.725), although the overall bleeding rate was increased in the TT group. Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that the TT group was associated with the best net clinical outcome. Conclusions: The cardiovascular benefits of triple antithrombotic therapy were confirmed by reducing the MACCE rate, and its major bleeding risk might be acceptable if the INR is closely monitored.

Content from these authors
© 2010 THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY
feedback
Top