Circulation Journal
Online ISSN : 1347-4820
Print ISSN : 1346-9843
ISSN-L : 1346-9843

This article has now been updated. Please use the final version.

Paradoxical Aging Changes of the Atrioventricular Nodal Properties in Patients With Atrioventricular Nodal Re-Entrant Tachycardia
Tzu-Wei TsengYu-Feng HuChin-Feng TsaiHsuan-Ming TsaoChing-Tai TaiYenn-Jiang LinShih-Lin ChangLi-Wei LoPi-Chang LeeCheng-Hung LiTze-Fan ChaoKazuyoshi SuenariYung-Kuo LinChern-En ChiangShih-Ann Chen
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS Advance online publication

Article ID: CJ-10-1205

Details
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to investigate the impact of aging on electrophysiological characteristics in patients with atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT). Methods and Results: The 2,111 patients who underwent an electrophysiological study and radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation of AVNRT were enrolled. The patients were divided into 4 groups according to age (group 1: <20 years; group 2: 20-39 years; group 3: 40-59 years; and group 4: ≥60 years). The gender distribution differed with age. The atrio-Hisian interval, and effective refractory periods (ERP) of the right atrium, ventricle, antegrade slow pathway, retrograde slow pathway and fast pathway, and tachycardia cycle length all increased with age. However, a paradoxical change in the fast pathway ERP was noted. The fast pathway ERP was significantly longer in group 2 than in other groups, and was associated with the largest tachycardia window. The response to catecholamines was similar between different age groups. Procedure time, radiation time, and complications did not differ. However, the number of RF impulses was higher in group 2 compared with other groups (7.6±9.3, P=0.04), which might imply a differing complexity during the ablation. Conclusions: Paradoxical aging changes of AVN electrophysiological characteristics were associated with a different atrioventricular nodal conduction property and the number of RF impulses.
Content from these authors
© 2011 THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY
feedback
Top