Circulation Journal
Online ISSN : 1347-4820
Print ISSN : 1346-9843
ISSN-L : 1346-9843

This article has now been updated. Please use the final version.

Impact of Stent-to-Vessel Diameter Ratio on Restenosis in the Superficial Femoral Artery After Endovascular Therapy
Naoya KurataOsamu IidaTatsuya ShirakiMasashi FujitaMasaharu MasudaShin OkamotoTakayuki IshiharaKiyonori NantoTakashi KandaAkihiro SunagaTakuya TsujimuraMitsuyoshi TakaharaToshiaki Mano
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS FULL-TEXT HTML Advance online publication

Article ID: CJ-17-0726

Details
Abstract

Background:Although stent-to-vessel (S/V) diameter ratio has been described as a restenotic factor after superficial femoral artery (SFA) stenting, the reference vessel diameter is commonly measured distally at a healthy site. It remains unclear whether S/V ratio assessed at the lesion site would be more predictive than that assessed distally at a healthy site.

Methods and Results:A total of 117 patients (mean age, 73±7 years; 74% male) who underwent successful nitinol stent implantation in SFA lesions (mean lesion length, 172±104 mm) on intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) were retrospectively analyzed. S/V ratio at the proximal and distal healthy site, and at the smallest lesion site, was evaluated on IVUS. One-year restenosis predictors were evaluated on multivariate analysis. Mean S/V diameter ratio on IVUS at proximal and distal healthy sites, and at the lesion site, was 0.98±0.11, 1.02±0.11 and 1.15±0.16, respectively. One-year primary patency was 77%. On multivariate analysis, lesion length (OR, 1.06 per 10-mm increment; P=0.046) and S/V ratio measured at the lesion site (OR, 1.34 per 0.1 increment; P=0.032), but not that at the distal healthy site (OR, 1.05 per 0.1 increment; P=0.705), were significantly associated with 1-year restenosis.

Conclusions:S/V ratio assessed on IVUS at the lesion site, but not at the distal healthy site, was independently associated with 1-year restenosis after SFA stenting.

Content from these authors
© 2017 THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY
feedback
Top