Circulation Journal
Online ISSN : 1347-4820
Print ISSN : 1346-9843
ISSN-L : 1346-9843

This article has now been updated. Please use the final version.

Prognostic Value of the 6-Minute Walk Test in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis
Norio KanamoriYasuaki TakejiTomohiko TaniguchiTakeshi MorimotoShinichi ShiraiKenji AndoHiroyuki TabataTakeshi KitaiNobuhisa OhnoRyosuke MuraiKohei OsakadaKoichiro MurataMasanao NakaiHiroshi TsuneyoshiTomohisa TadaMasashi AmanoShin WatanabeHiroki ShiomiHirotoshi WatanabeYusuke YoshikawaRyusuke NishikawaYuki ObayashiKo YamamotoMamoru ToyofukuShojiro TatsushimaMakoto MiyakeHiroyuki NakayamaKazuya NagaoMasayasu IzuharaKenji NakatsumaMoriaki InokoTakanari FujitaMasahiro KimuraMitsuru IshiiShunsuke UsamiFumiko NakazekiKiyonori TogiYasutaka InuzukaTatsuhiko KomiyaKoh OnoTakeshi AoyamaKenji MinatoyaTakeshi Kimura on behalf of the CURRENT AS Registry-2 Investigators
Author information
JOURNAL OPEN ACCESS FULL-TEXT HTML Advance online publication
Supplementary material

Article ID: CJ-25-0056

Details
Abstract

Background: The prognostic significance of the 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) has not been thoroughly investigated.

Methods and Results: This study evaluated 998 patients with severe AS who underwent a 6-min walk test as part of a large multicenter prospective cohort. Patients were categorized as either fast walkers (6MWD ≥300 m; n=515) or slow walkers (6MWD <300 m; n=483). During a median follow-up of 2.3 years, 861 (86.3%) patients underwent surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (AVR; 87.0% of fast walkers vs. 85.5% of slow walkers). The cumulative 3-year incidence of death was significantly lower among fast walkers than slow walkers (10.9% vs. 31.7%; P<0.001). After adjusting for confounders, slow walkers had a significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality than fast walkers (hazard ratio 2.36; 95% confidence interval 1.55–3.58; P<0.001). Stratified analysis by initial treatment strategy revealed that the cumulative 3-year incidence of all-cause death was consistently lower among fast walkers than slow walkers (initial AVR strategy: 10.1% vs. 28.1% [P<0.001]; conservative strategy: 13.4% vs. 46.7% [P<0.001]). Among asymptomatic patients managed conservatively, fast walkers demonstrated a remarkably low cumulative 3-year incidence of all-cause death (8.1%).

Conclusions: The 6MWD is a reliable prognostic marker for patients with severe AS, regardless of initial treatment strategy.

Content from these authors
© 2025, THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons [Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International] license.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
feedback
Top