Comparison of Balloon Angioplasty and Stent Implantation for Femoropopliteal Disease According to Patient and Lesion Subgroup

Abstract

Background: Little is known about the superiority of balloon angioplasty vs. stent implantation for femoropopliteal (FP) lesions according to subgroup.

Methods and Results: This study involved 1,018 de novo (balloon angioplasty, n=462; stent implantation, n=556) and 114 in-stent restenosis (ISR) FP lesions (balloon angioplasty, n=69; stent implantation, n=45) treated with endovascular therapy. For de novo FP lesions, the 3-year primary patency rate was significantly better with stent implantation than with balloon angioplasty (61% vs. 69%, log-rank P=0.001), but it was similar for ISR FP lesions (40% vs. 43%, log-rank P=0.83). For de novo FP lesions, stent implantation was favorable in all subgroups except for female sex (hazard ratio [HR], 0.92; 95% CI: 0.65–1.31, P=0.66), critical limb ischemia (CLI; HR, 0.70; 95% CI: 0.46–1.06, P=0.10), calcified lesion (HR, 0.81; 95% CI: 0.46–1.39, P=0.44), and poor tibial run-off (HR, 0.86; 95% CI: 0.59–1.25, P=0.42) subgroups. No difference was found between the 2 treatment strategies for ISR FP lesions in the majority of subgroups. Stent implantation, however, was favorable in totally occluded ISR FP lesions (HR, 0.45; 95% CI: 0.21–1.01, P=0.05).

Conclusions: The primary patency rate in de novo FP lesions for the 2 treatment strategies was similar in the female, calcified lesion, CLI, and poor tibial run-off subgroups. Stent implantation was superior to balloon angioplasty for totally occluded ISR FP lesions.