Circulation Reports
Online ISSN : 2434-0790
JCS/JRC Emergency Cardiovascular Care Systematic Review Series 2025
Preventive Effect of Nifekalant on Recurrent Ventricular Fibrillation and Electrical Storm ― A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis ―
Kazuo SakamotoKenichi IijimaTetsuma KawajiTakayuki KitaiYukio HosakaMutsuko SangawaHiroki ShiomiMasashi YokoseEiji HiraokaHiroshi TakahashiTetsuya MatobaMigaku KikuchiYoshio TaharaHiroshi NonogiTeruo NoguchiYasushi TsujimotoToshikazu Funazaki for the Japan Resuscitation Council (JRC) Emergency Cardiovascular Care (ECC) Arrhythmia Task Force and the Guideline Editorial Committee on behalf of the Japanese Circulation Society (JCS) Emergency and Critical Care Committee
Author information
JOURNAL OPEN ACCESS FULL-TEXT HTML
Supplementary material

2025 Volume 7 Issue 11 Pages 1029-1036

Details
Abstract

Background: Several antiarrhythmic agents, including amiodarone (AMD) and nifekalant (NIF), are used in the management of life-threatening arrhythmias such as ventricular fibrillation (VF) and ventricular tachycardia (VT). Although a few studies have compared the antiarrhythmic effect of NIF and AMD, most have focused on termination or defibrillation of VF/VT. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to assess the current evidence on the preventive effects of NIF and AMD on recurrent VF and electrical storm (ES).

Methods and Results: The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024578486). PubMed (MEDLINE and PMC), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Science Citation Index Expanded, and Igaku Chuo Zasshi were searched for observational studies and randomized controlled trials evaluating patients with cardiac arrest due to recurrent VF and ES treated with AMD or NIF, published before 28 August 2024. The primary endpoint was the recurrence of VF/VT. Secondary outcomes included short-term death and incidence of torsades de pointes (TdP). 5 eligible studies comprising 222 participants were included. Evidence regarding differences between NIF and AMD in the recurrence of VF/VT, short-term death, and incidence of TdP was of very low certainty and remains highly uncertain.

Conclusions: NIF and AMD may have little to no difference in preventing the recurrence of VF/VT, short-term death, or incidence of TdP; however, the certainty of the evidence is very low.

Fullsize Image
Content from these authors
© 2025, THE JAPANESE CIRCULATION SOCIETY

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons [Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International] license.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top