2018 Volume 65 Issue 11 Pages 1071-1074
Lenvatinib is a molecular-targeting agent that was recently approved in Japan for treatment of curatively unresectable, radioactive iodine-refractory, progressive differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). Because only a few Japanese patients have received lenvatinib in clinical trials, there are limited domestic data on its safety and efficacy or prognostic factors. Therefore, a prospective observational study has been designed to collect safety and efficacy data in at least 300 patients with curatively unresectable DTC receiving lenvatinib therapy (24 mg/day), in order to find predictors of antitumor activity and survival. Patients with progressive curatively unresectable DTC refractory to radioiodine therapy will be enrolled and the primary endpoint will be overall survival. This study is designed to estimate the 95% confidence intervals of the 1-year and 2-year survival rates with a two-sided width of less than 10%. Secondary endpoints will be the time to treatment failure, time to strategy failure, progression-free survival time with clinical progressive disease, response rate, quality of life, safety, and patient reports. The ultimate goal is to obtain information for developing evidence-based guidelines for treatment of DTC, including recommendations on patient selection, dosages, and duration of treatment. This study has been registered with the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000022243).
In recent years, development of molecular-targeting agents has led to new treatments for various refractory malignancies, but approval of these agents tends to be delayed in Japan and we often have insufficient clinical data about the effects in Japanese patients. Accordingly, Japanese doctors need to proactively perform domestic clinical trials of molecular-targeting agents. This article provides an outline for such a study of lenvatinib in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC).
DTC is initially treated by surgical resection. Patients may subsequently receive radioactive iodine (RAI) to destroy residual normal thyroid tissue and subclinical micrometastases, or to treat recurrent or metastatic disease. If recurrent or metastatic DTC does not respond to RAI therapy, further treatment options are limited and the prognosis is poor .
However, placebo-controlled global phase III studies have shown significant improvement of progression-free survival (PFS) by molecular-targeting agents such as sorafenib and lenvatinib in patients with RAI-refractory DTC (RR-DTC) and both agents have become available to treat this tumor, for which there used to be no effective therapy [2-4]. Lenvatinib selectively inhibits multiple receptor tyrosine kinases associated with tumor angiogenesis and/or tumor progression [4, 5].
A randomized, double-blind, phase III study compared lenvatinib (n = 261) versus placebo (n = 131) in patients with RR-DTC , revealing significantly better results with lenvatinib than placebo for median PFS (18.3 vs. 3.6 months; p < 0.001) and the overall response rate (64.8% vs. 1.5%; p < 0.001).
Subanalysis of Japanese patients from this study (lenvatinib, n = 30; placebo, n = 10) showed that dose reduction was more frequent among them than in the overall patient population (90.0% vs. 67.8%) and suspension of therapy due to adverse events (AEs) was also more frequent (Japanese, 82.4%; overall, 80.0%) . In addition, a phase II study of lenvatinib in 51 Japanese patients with thyroid cancer (25 with RR-DTC, 9 with medullary carcinoma, and 17 with anaplastic carcinoma) revealed responses of all tumor subtypes and tumor shrinkage in most patients .
However, previous studies have provided little evidence about the safety and efficacy of long-term lenvatinib therapy in Japanese patients, including no information about the relation between time to treatment failure (TTF) and the prognosis, the factors influencing TTF, and the effect of clinical characteristics such as the tumor histology and prior therapy.
Against this background, a prospective observational study was designed to collect safety and efficacy data on lenvatinib in Japanese patients with curatively unresectable, RAI-refractory, and progressive DTC, in order to find predictors of antitumor activity and survival. The final objective is to provide reference information for developing evidence-based DTC treatment guidelines, including recommendations on patient selection, dosages, and treatment duration.
The most important clinical endpoint of molecular-targeting therapy is survival. Therefore, the primary endpoint of this study will be overall survival (OS), in order to determine whether achieving longer disease control with lenvatinib improves the prognosis. Clinical progressive disease  is defined as disease progression with progressive symptoms, multiple disease progression, or life-threatening organ metastasis, and this concept will be used to evaluate tumor progression (first time for thyroid cancer in Japan). This study will also examine quality of life (QOL) due to the relatively long survival of DTC patients.
When lenvatinib is administered, AEs may lead to dose reduction and suspension or discontinuation of therapy. Therefore, we will attempt to elucidate the TTF of lenvatinib and TTF-related factors in actual clinical practice. The rationale for selecting lenvatinib will be investigated along with its influence on the prognosis.
A prospective observational study will enroll patients with curatively unresectable RAI-refractory and progressive DTC who meet the eligibility criteria and are administered lenvatinib in the real-world clinical setting. We will collect information on prognostic factors, including previous treatment, other concomitant therapies, and re-administration of lenvatinib after the study period, and we will comprehensively evaluate the utility of this drug.
Lenvatinib will be administered orally at a dose of 24 mg daily. The dose will be reduced if necessary, depending on the patient’s condition.
AEs will be assessed and hematology tests and biochemistry tests will be performed before the start of lenvatinib therapy and in Weeks 4, 12, 26, and 52 of treatment.
Patients will be asked to keep a diary of treatment compliance and blood pressure measurements during the treatment period up to Week 52. Patients will also be asked to note symptoms such as decreased appetite and fatigue.
QOL will be investigated at baseline and in Weeks 4, 12, 26 and 52 of lenvatinib therapy. The EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire  will be employed, which is a common standardized questionnaire for measurement of self-reported health and functioning. Investigators and patients will both answer the questionnaire. The results will also provide data for assessing medical economics.
The response to lenvatinib will be assessed at each study site. Assessment of progression will be done according to clinical progressive disease criteria at baseline and in Weeks 4, 12, 26 and 52 of lenvatinib therapy.
At two years (24 months) after the day when the last patient enrolled starts treatment, the outcome, antitumor effect, compliance with lenvatinib therapy, and serious AEs will be investigated in patients who are confirmed to have survived for 52 weeks from initiation of treatment.
The primary endpoint will be OS. The secondary endpoints will be as follows: (1) TTF; (2) time to failure of strategy; (3) PFS time with clinical progressive disease; (4) response rate; (5) QOL survey; (6) safety; and (7) patient reports.
Inclusion criteria will be (1) patients with curatively unresectable, RAI-refractory, and progressive DTC who are suitable for treatment with lenvatinib; (2) patients commencing lenvatinib treatment after this study has been reviewed by the study site committee (e.g., institutional review board or ethical review board); and (3) patients who give informed consent to participation in this study.
Patients who are deemed unsuitable for this study by the attending physician will be excluded.
A total of 300 patients will be enrolled in this study at 100 Japanese institutions.
Patient enrollment will be carried out from the date of review committee approval up to December 2017. The overall study period will be from the date of review committee approval until June 2020.
The study is designed to estimate the 95% confidence intervals of the 1-year and 2-year survival rates with a two-sided width of less than 10%. The planned sample size (n = 300 or more) was set by calculating the sample sizes required for the above assessment (1-year survival: n = 240–370; 2-year survival: n = 380–590) based on data from Study 303 (1-year survival: 81.6%; 2-year survival: 58.2%) with normal approximation of the binomial distribution.
This study is sponsored by the Comprehensive Support Project for Oncology Research (CSPOR) of the Public Health Research Foundation. It will be fully funded by Eisai Co., Ltd. The CSPOR secretariat will perform clerical work for the study, but will not make decisions concerning planning, implementation, or publication of the study results. This study will be performed independently of the funder, who will not be involved in decision making with regard to planning, implementation, analysis, or publication of the study results. All decisions with regard to study planning, implementation, and publication of results will be made by the study executive committee.
The study protocol was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR; UMIN000022243) on 26 May 2016.
All of the researchers will conduct this study in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the ethical guidelines for medical research on human subjects [10, 11]. This study has been approved by the institutional review boards of individual participating facilities. Informed consent will be obtained from all patients prior to their participation in the study.
M.T. received grants and personal fees from Eisai during the conduct of the study, as well as personal fees from Merck Sharp & Dohme, personal fees from Bayer, personal fees from Otsuka, grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, grants and personal fees from Astra Zeneca, grants and personal fees from Pfizer, grants from Novartis, and grants from NanoCarrier. Outside the period covered by this manuscript, I.S. received personal fees from Eisai, grants from Eisai, personal fees from Sanofi, and personal fees from Bayer. K.S. received personal fees from Eisai outside the period covered by this manuscript. Y.O. received personal fees from Public Health Research Foundation outside the period covered by this manuscript, as well as an executive salary from Statcom, honoraria from Chugai Pharmaceutical, Shionogi, Daiichi-Sankyo, and Sanofi, and a grant from Eisai. T.I. received personal fees and non-financial support from Eisai during the conduct of the study, as well as personal fees and non-financial support from Bayer, personal fees and non-financial support from Astrazeneca, personal fees and non-financial support from Genzyme, personal fees from Pfizer, and personal fees from Ono outside the period covered by this manuscript. None of the other authors have any relevant disclosures.