Endocrine Journal
Online ISSN : 1348-4540
Print ISSN : 0918-8959
ISSN-L : 0918-8959
ORIGINAL
Efficacy and safety of stem cells transplantation in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus—a systematic review and meta-analysis
Qian WuShuai ZhengYao QinXuqin ZhengHeng ChenTao YangMei Zhang
Author information
JOURNAL FREE ACCESS FULL-TEXT HTML

2020 Volume 67 Issue 8 Pages 827-840

Details
Abstract

Stem cells (SCs) therapy is a new promising therapeutic modality for type 1 diabetes (T1DM). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of stem cells transplantation (SCT) in patients with T1DM. We searched five literature databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, WanFang and CENTRAL) up to 31 October 2019. 29 studies (487 patients with T1DM) were included in our meta-analysis. There was no substantial publication bias. Meta-analysis showed the SCT had significant effect to decrease HbA1c (SMD, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.93 to 1.86; p < 0.00001; I2 = 89%) and to improve C-peptide levels (SMD, –0.62; 95% CI, –1.22 to –0.02; p = 0.04; I2 = 92%) at 1 year follow-up. Subgroup analyses showed the heterogeneity level of the results was high. Significant improvement of metabolic outcomes was observed in the subgroups of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) combined with hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and HSCs. The older age showed significant association with the efficacy in HSCs subgroup. The higher GADA positive rate before treatment also significantly associated with the decrease of daily insulin requirement. The transient insulin independence rate at last follow-up was 9.6 per 100 person-years (95% CI: 5.8–13.5%). The mean length of insulin independence was 15.6 months (95% CI: 12.3–18.9). The mortality of SCT was 3.4% (95% CI: 2.1–5.5%). Therefore, SCT is an efficacious and safe method for treating patients with T1DM especially in the subgroups of MSCs + HSCs and HSCs. Well designed, double blind and randomized controlled trails with large sample size and long-term follow-up are needed for further evaluation.

Content from these authors
© The Japan Endocrine Society
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top