2020 Volume 67 Issue 9 Pages 893-902
Androgen regulates the function of lacrimal and meibomian glands, and its deficiency is a pathological factor underlying dry eye disease (DED). However, no androgen has been approved for treating DED due to lack of definite evidence regarding its efficacy and safety in clinics. In this systematic review, we have summarized the clinical studies on the safety and efficacy of androgen replacement therapy (ART) for DED. Medline (via Pubmed), Embase, Clinicaltrials.gov, Wanfang and Chinese Clinical Trials Registry Database were searched for the relevant prospective studies, and 7 studies wherein androgen was applied topically via eye drops or systemically via oral or transdermal administration were included. The quality of these studies was assessed with the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias and methodological index for non-randomized studies. Most studies showed that androgen effectively improved dry eye-related symptoms and increased tear secretion. Furthermore, elderly men and peri-menopausal women with lower levels of circulating androgens responded better to ART. However, one study involving patients with Sjögren’s syndrome showed no improvement in the ART group compared to the placebo control, or to the baseline level. Adverse effects were also common but limited to mild skin problems. In conclusion, androgen is a potential treatment for dry eye disease, especially for people with primary androgen deficiency. Short-term application is relatively safe.
Dry eye disease (DED) is a chronic condition characterized by instability of the tear film, and affects women and the elderly more often [1]. The prevalence of DED in the general population varies from 3% to 40% [2-7]. According to the 2013 National Health and Wellness Survey conducted on 75,000 adult individuals in USA, the prevalence of DED on the basis of subjective symptoms was 8.8% and 4.5% in women and men respectively [5]. Furthermore, a recent meta-analysis on the Chinese population reported a significantly higher prevalence of 31.4% based on self-reported symptoms [3]. Although most cases of DED involve only mild discomfort, it can progress to conjunctival injection, ocular surface inflammation, corneal neovascularization or even loss of vision [8]. In addition, the chronic discomfort associated with DED may lead to psychological problems such as depression [9]. It is also associated with a considerable economic burden and causes an estimated loss of $3.84 billion annually in USA alone [10].
Several in vitro and in vivo studies show that androgens increase tear secretion and osmolarity [11-13] upon binding to androgen receptors (AR) on the acinar cells of lacrimal glands [14, 15]. They also play a vital role in lipid biosynthesis in the meibomian glands by regulating the expression of key genes associated with lipid uptake, chain elongation and lipid secretion [16-18]. Androgen deficiency is associated with meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) and can lead to evaporative dry eye [13]. Given their role in maintaining both the lipid and aqueous components of the tear film, androgens are a potential therapeutic option in water-deficient as well as evaporative DED. Clinical studies show a higher risk of meibomian gland dysfunction and DED in patients with complete androgen-insensitivity syndrome (CAIS) or those on anti-androgen therapy [19-23]. In addition, elderly men and post-menopausal women with significantly lower levels of endogenous androgens are more susceptible to DED compared to younger individuals [24-26]. Since the serum androgen level correlates with lipid function and tear secretion [27, 28], androgen replacement therapy (ART) is a potential strategy to treat DED. However, due to the concerns of possible adverse effects and lack of approved androgen-based regimen for DED, androgens are not routinely used in the clinical setting. To this end, we conducted a systematic review of studies on the efficacy and safety of ART against DED.
The literature search was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines [29]. The Medline (via Pubmed), Embase, Clinicaltrials.gov, Wanfang and Chinese Clinical Trials Registry Database were mined for clinical prospective studies on the application of ART for DED published in English and Chinese language till February 2nd, 2020 using the following MeSH key words: “dry eye syndrome”, “dry eye disease”, “keratoconjunctivitis sicca”, “xerophthalmia”, “eye dryness” and “androgen”. The studies were independently screened by three investigators (Lixiang Wang, Jinqing Li and Shengqiang Zhang) who conducted a full test review of the selected articles. The detailed search strategy is outlined in the supplementary material. The final studies were included based on the following criteria: 1) randomized controlled trial (RCT), non-randomized trial, cohort study or self-controlled study, 2) including patients clinically diagnosed with DED, and 3) ART as the primary treatment for DED. Observational studies, case reports or retrospective studies, those involving combination therapy of androgens with other hormones and lacking an androgen monotherapy group, and animal studies were excluded.
Quality assessmentThe quality of the selected RCTs was evaluated with Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias [30] based on random sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding of participants, personnel and outcome assessment, incomplete data, selective reporting and other biases. For non-randomized trials, methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) was used [31].
Data extractionThe publication year, first author information, country, journal name, study type, number of participants, and the age and sex ratio were extracted from each study. In addition, outcome measures, such as TBUT, Schirmer’s test, corneal fluorescence staining score, ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score, tear meniscus height, ocular comfort index, tear osmolality, serum testosterone level and adverse effects information were also extracted if available. Due to the high degree of heterogeneity among the studies in terms of study designs and outcome measures, a meta-analysis was not conducted.
A total of 1,297 studies were initially retrieved from Medline (147), Embase (296), Clinicaltrials.gov (740), Wanfang (67) and Chinese Clinical Trials Registry (47). After removing 107 duplicated studies, the abstracts of the remaining 1,190 studies were evaluated based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The full-text of 46 studies were reviewed, of which 7 were finally selected for the systematic review (Fig. 1). The characteristics of the eligible studies are summarized in Table 1. The assessments for risk of bias are listed in Figs. 2, 3 and Table 2.
Flow diagram for study selection
Name and type of Studies | N | Incomplete follow-ups | Gender | Mean-age | Participants | Intervention | Control | Duration | Time of Data collection | Outcome Measures | Potential bias or limitations |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Supalaset 2018 RCT |
50 | 4 | M/F = 0.35 | 62.54 ± 7.00 | Post-menopausal women and andropausal men with DED | Transdermal 50 mg testosterone (Androgel®, BESINS Healthcare, Belgium), Qod | Transdermal 100 mg urea cream, Qod | 4 weeks | Baseline & 4 weeks | OSDI score, tear meniscus height, corneal fluorescein staining (Van Bijsterveld scoring system), TBUT, Schirmer test I | 1. No difference of serum T levels was found in male patients between test and placebo groups after treatment. Thus it was unclear whether improvement of dry eye was associated with increased T levels 2. The testing drug and placebo were not very similar |
Golebiowski 2017 RCT |
46 | 6 | All female | 63.90 ± 5.10 | Post-menopausal women with DED | Transdermal 1. 1% testosterone cream plus a placebo gel, 0.5 mL Qd 2. 1 mg/g oestradiol gel plus a placebo cream, 1 g Qd 3. 1% testosterone cream 0.5 mL Qd plus 1 mg/g oestradiol gel 1 g Qd |
Transdermal placebo cream 1 g Qd plus a placebo gel 0.5 mL Qd | 8 weeks | Baseline & 8 weeks | OSDI score, Ocular Comfort Index, tear osmolarity, TBUT, phenol red thread test, Schirmer test I, corneal fluorescein staining (modified Oxford grading scale), meibomian gland assessment | 1. Small sample sizes in each group 2. Large variations of baseline hormone levels in different groups |
Pillemer 2004 RCT |
28 | 0 | All female | 53.90 ± 3.44 | Primary Sjögren’s syndrome patients with DED | Oral DHEA (Diosynth, Inc.) 200 mg Qd | Oral placebo Qd | 24 weeks | Baseline, 4, 12, 24 & 28 weeks | symptom assessment by visual analog scale, corneal fluorescein staining (Van Bijsterveld scoring system), Schirmer test I | 1. Very small sample sizes and nonrandom drop-out of participants 2. The assessment of dry eye largely relied on subjective judgment 3. Examination of serum T level was not conducted |
Connor 2008 Non-randomized trial |
21 | 0 | All female | 47.47 | Women with evaporative dry eye | Transdermal 5% testosterone cream, Bid | NA | 3 weeks | Baseline & 3 weeks | OSDI score, TBUT, Schirmer test I | 1. The author aimed to treat evaporative DED by application of androgen to meibomian glands to improve their function of lipid secretion. However, no direct examination of meibomian gland was conducted 2. No control group |
Connor 2003 Non-randomized trial |
28 | 0 | M/F = 0.12 | 52.50 | Patients with subjective complaints of dry eye | Transdermal 3% testosterone cream, Bid | Transdermal placebo cream, Bid | 2 weeks | Baseline & 2 weeks | TUBT, Schirmer test I | 1. Only 3 male participants were involved. 2. Subjective symptom assessment of DED was not included |
Connor 2009 Non-randomized trial |
62 | 0 | All female | Group 1 26.57 ± 5.00 Group 2 48.56 ± 4.23 Group 3 68.08 ± 6.35 |
Women with dry eye symptoms | Transdermal 5% testosterone cream, Bid | NA | 3 weeks | Baseline & 3 weeks | OSDI score, TBUT, Schirmer test I | 1. No control group 2. Conditions such as Sjögren’s syndrome and meibomian gland dysfunction which could lead to DED were not examined. These conditions were relatively common and had different prevalence in different age groups |
Connor 2001 Non-randomized trail |
10 | 0 | M/F = 9 | 26.40 | Patients with subjective complaints of dry eye | Tropical artificial tears with 1% DHEA, Qid | Tropical artificial tears, Qid | 2 weeks | Baseline & 2 weeks | Subjective symptom questionnaire, TBUT, Schirmer test I | 1. Very small cohort 2. Only 1 female participant was involved 3. This was a cross-over study but no wash-out period was given |
Abbreviations: RCT, randomized controlled trial; DED, dry eye disease; OSDI, ocular surface disease index; TBUT, tear break-up time; DHEA, dehydroepiandrosterone; MGD, meibomian gland dysfunction; Qod, once per 2 days; Qd, once a day; Bid, twice a day; Qid, four times a day; T, testosterone
Risk of bias of included RCTs by Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias
Risk of bias of included non-randomized trials by methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS)
Studies | Bias | Author’s judgment | Support for judgment |
---|---|---|---|
Supalaset 2018 | Blinding of Outcome Assessment | Unclear risk | The author stated the study to be “double-masked” and described the masking methods for patients, but didn’t mention any detailed masking methods for examiners. |
Incomplete outcome data | Unclear risk | The author stated “four patients in the placebo group were unable to attend a follow-up”. However, the author didn’t evaluate how it affected the outcome. | |
Golebiowski 2017 | Allocation concealment | Unclear risk | The author stated “a random allocation sequence was generated using Excel”, but didn’t mention about allocation concealment. |
Pillemer 2004 | Random sequence generation | Unclear risk | The author stated “randomization resulted in 14 DHEA and 14 placebo group subjects”, but didn’t mention any details about the method of random sequence generation. |
Incomplete outcome data | High risk | The author stated “four DHEA and one placebo group patient dropped out because of adverse effects”. This number was substantial due to very small total sample sizes. Besides, the author didn’t mention whether the data from previous visits of dropped-out patients were included in analysis. | |
Selective reporting | Unclear risk | The author stated 4 visits at week 4, 12, 24 and 28 after enrollment, but only the data from the last visit was reported. | |
Other bias | Unclear bias | The author simply used visual analog scale to assess symptoms of dry eye and dry mouth and didn’t provide enough standards for participants to grade their severity. A more thorough and verified questionnaire such as OSDI score may be more appropriate. |
Five studies, including 2 double-blind RCTs, used ointments containing 1–5% of testosterone to treat DED. Supalaset et al. recruited a total of 50 participants—menopausal women and andropausal men with low serum androgen levels—and instructed them to apply a cream containing either 50 mg testosterone or 100 mg urea on the lower abdomen on alternate days for 4 weeks. After 4 weeks of hormonal replacement, the OSDI score improved dramatically in the testosterone group, while no changes were reported in the placebo group. The quality of life (QOL) also improved for both male and female participants treated with testosterone. In addition, the TBUT increased by 7.4 s and the Schirmer’s test result increased by 6.84 mm on average in the testosterone group. Other indices of dry eyes, including tear meniscus height and corneal fluorescein staining, also showed remarkable improvement in the testosterone versus placebo group [32]. Golebiowski et al. recruited 46 post-menopausal women and randomized them into the 1% testosterone, oestradiol, testosterone plus oestradiol and placebo groups. The participants were instructed to apply the test cream/gel once a day for 8 weeks. Both OSDI score and ocular comfort index (OCI) improved following testosterone administration but were not significant compared to the placebo group. Tear secretion, Schirmer’s test results and TBUT also showed mild improvement in the testosterone group, whereas other clinical indices were similar to that of the placebo control. However, the serum level of the androgen metabolite 3α-diol-G markedly increased in the testosterone group, and showed a strong positive correlation with the TBUT score [33].
Connor et al. conducted 3 studies to explore the efficacy of testosterone cream [34-36]. The studies were not blinded for participants or researchers, nor were the subjects randomly divided. The cohorts were small in three studies, and the participants were relatively younger and not necessarily androgen-deficient. In the first study, 28 participants (25 females and 3 males) applied either a placebo cream or 3% testosterone cream twice a day for 2 weeks. The Schirmer’s test results increased significantly in the testosterone group compared with baseline and to the placebo group, while TBUT scores were similar in both groups. In addition, more than half of the testosterone users reported lessening of dry eye symptoms, and post-menopausal women exhibited maximum improvement. The testosterone dose was increased to 5% and the treatment regimen was prolonged to 3 weeks in the subsequent study on 21 female participants (22–68 years old) suffering from evaporative dry eye. The patients reported a significant relief of symptoms, with an average decrease of 15.94 in the OSDI score. TBUT also increased significantly after 3 weeks compared to the baseline. In the third study, 62 female DED patients were divided into 3 groups by age and treated via topical application of 5% testosterone cream on the eyelids. The women aged 40–60 years showed the greatest improvement after treatment, with the OSDI score dropping by 54.7%, TBUT increasing by 2.48 s and Schirmer’s test result increasing by 4.5 mm on average. Women aged under 40 and over 60 years only showed a slight improvement in symptoms and clinical signs.
(2) Topical administrationConnor et al. used eye drops containing 1% dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), a precursor of testosterone, to treat DED [37] in 10 participants with subjective complaints of dry eye. All participants (including 9 young men) were instructed to use the test eye drops or placebo (artificial tears) four times a day for 2 weeks, and then switch to the other for another 2 weeks. All subjects reported irritation after using the DHEA eye drops, and 60% favored artificial tears with DHEA due to relief in dry eye symptoms. The TUBT and Schirmer’s test results were significantly improved in the DHEA group compared with baseline and to the placebo group.
(3) Oral administrationPillemer et al. conducted a double-blind randomized pilot study on 28 patients with primary Sjögren’s syndrome wherein 200 mg DHEA or placebo capsules were taken once a day for 24 weeks [38]. Previous studies have shown that the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis is inhibited in Sjögren’s syndrome patients and decreases serum testosterone and DHEA levels [39, 40], resulting in an androgen-deficient state. The oral and ocular symptoms were subjectively assessed by the visual analog scale (VAS). No significant improvements were observed in the clinical symptoms, Schirmer’s tests or corneal fluorescein staining compared with baseline and to the placebo group.
Adverse effectsAdverse effects were reported in 2 studies [38, 41]. Nine participants (23.1%) in total reported adverse effects that may be associated with the ectopic androgen (Table 3). Most adverse reactions consisted of mild skin problems such as excessive oiliness of skin and acne, although 2 participants that took DHEA tablets reported more severe effects and discontinued the treatment. One participant with a history of recurrent acne suffered from a severe acne outbreak, and the other developed acute abdominal pain due to Streptococcus infection unrelated to DHEA. However, since both studies were conducted over a short period, the long-term adverse effects of ART are unknown.
Form of androgen | Way of administration | Period | Adverse effects | Androgen group (total number) | Placebo group (total number) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Testosterone | Transdermal | 4 weeks | Oily skin | 5 (25) | 0 (21) |
Acne | 1 (25) | 0 (21) | |||
DHEA | Oral | 24 weeks | Severe acne | 1 (14) | 0 (14) |
Post-dose chills, nervousness | 1 (14) | 0 (14) | |||
Disseminated streptococcal infection | 1 (14) | 0 (14) | |||
Perforated peptic ulcer | 0 (14) | 1 (14) |
Although androgens promote lacrimal and meibum secretion, ART is not routinely used for treating DED due to lack of conclusive evidence regarding its efficacy and safety. In addition, no androgen formulation has been approved so far in China or USA for the indication of DED. Androgens can be administered through eye drops (topical), skin ointments and patches (transdermal), or pills (oral), and the application method greatly influence its bioavailability, efficacy and safety [42]. We conducted a systematic review of prospective studies analyzing the therapeutic effects of oral, transdermal and topical androgen formulations on DED. No other meta-analysis or systematic review has been published that summarizes the effects of androgen on DED symptoms. Only 7 studies met our inclusion criteria, of which 3 were RCTs. However, all studies had small sample sizes ranging from 10 to 62 participants (245 in total). While the RCTs were of relatively high quality with double blinding and randomization, the non-randomized clinical trials may have harbored additional bias from sample sizes, evaluation of outcome measures and the intervention of the parallel control group according to NIMORS standard.
Six studies showed that androgens administered via ointments or eye drops effectively relieved the symptoms of dry eye and increased tear stability over a period of 2 to 4 weeks. Furthermore, peri-menopausal women and elderly (andropausal) men with androgen deficiency responded best to the ART. The only study that did not show any ameliorative effects of androgen was conducted on patients with Sjögren’s syndrome, a systemic autoimmune disease with excessive inflammatory cell infiltration in the lacrimal glands that eventually leads to aqueous-deficient dry eye [43]. Even a 24-week treatment with DHEA did not improve self-reported symptoms or tear secretion. Therefore, ART can be considered for patients with primary deficiency of endogenous androgens but it may not be effective in patients with Sjögren’s syndrome as a monotherapy.
Mild acne and oily skin were the most frequent adverse effects resulting from increased serum androgen levels, and diminished once ART was discontinued. One participant with a history of recurrent acne had a severe outbreak during the hormone treatment, and was thus likely sensitive to androgen. There are currently no reports on the adverse effects of long-term ART, which is of concern since DED is a chronic condition and may require a prolonged treatment. Besides, the frequently and easily noted skin problems related to androgen may break the blindness in the RCT studies.
In addition to the long-term safety and efficacy of ART, the time needed to reach maximum effects, the effect of the route of administration, potential sex-associated differences in treatment response, as well as objective assessments of DED need to be investigated further in order to establish evidence-based clinical androgen therapy for DED. There is currently no standard diagnostic criteria of DED, and its diagnosis and severity assessment mainly rely on self-reported symptoms, evaluation of tear secretion and signs of ocular surface damage [44]. Likewise, most studies included in this systematic review diagnosed DED on the basis of tear break-up time, corneal fluorescein staining score and subjective self-reported symptoms. Due to the inherently large inter- and intra-observer differences associated with such assays, an objective measurement scale is needed [45, 46]. Furthermore, most studies only evaluated the aqueous secretion and ignored the effects on the lipid and mucus components of tears. A combination of non-invasive break-up time, objective automatic corneal staining, tear interferometer and tear chemokine and metallopeptidase levels can help assess DED in a more thorough and objective manner [44]. In addition, the accurate assessment of pre-treatment androgen levels is critical, especially for patients with suspected endogenous androgen deficiency, in order to select the correct participants and prevent adverse effects of supratherapeutic androgen levels [47]. Since the serum androgen level is influenced by gender, age, diurnal variations, intra-individual variations and detection method, the reference levels of normal serum androgen differ across laboratories [48, 49]. In addition, the bioavailability and activity of androgen depends on the serum levels of binding proteins (mainly the sex hormone binding globulin or SHBG), activity of transferring enzymes (5-α reductase) and the sensitivity of androgen receptors [50, 51]. Therefore, it is also necessary to evaluate serum levels of androgen-related factors like total testosterone, free testosterone, dihydrotestosterone (DHEA) and SHBG at multiple time points throughout the regimen in order to monitor the therapeutic response. An adequate study duration is also needed to demonstrate the potential beneficial and harmful effects of androgen therapy. The time to reach the maximum effect of androgens should be determined via continuous evaluation of DED. Previous studies have reported considerable variation—ranging from 3 weeks to 12 months—in the time needed for androgen supplementation to show therapeutic effects due to factors like erection, depression, erythropoiesis and rise of prostate-specific antigens [52]. Since DED is a chronic condition requiring protracted therapy, long-term studies are needed in the future. Finally, the formulation and mode of administration also affect the outcome. Since ART was primarily designed to treat male patients with androgen deficiency, the appropriate doses for women and men with DED have not been standardized so far. Androgen can be administered via the oral, nasal, buccal, transdermal, subdermal and intramuscular routes, which influence the acting time (short for buccal, nasal and topical routes, and long for intramuscular and subdermal routes), dosing frequency, bioavailability (high for intramuscular injection and low for topical eye drops) as well as formulation-specific adverse effects (for e.g. gingivitis for buccal tablets and skin blistering for skin patches) [53]. More studies are needed to compare their efficacy and adverse effects, and therefore choose the more appropriate forms for DED.
This is the first systematic review which addresses the effects of androgen therapy via oral, transdermal and topical applications on DED. The studies included in this review demonstrated the therapeutic effects of androgen on male and female patients with endogenous androgen deficiency, as well as younger individuals with normal androgen levels. However, there are some limitations in our study that ought to be addressed. First, only 3 RCTs were included and all studies had small sample sizes. Furthermore, insufficient data prevented further meta-analysis to obtain conclusive results. Second, the study durations of most studies were 2–4 weeks, which was insufficient to observe the long-term adverse effects of androgen therapy. Finally, there was potential risk of bias from the selection of studies as all 4 non-RCTs were reported by the same researcher and only 7 useful studies were obtained. Therefore, more studies with larger sample sizes need to conducted in the future.
Short-term ART is a potential and relatively safe option for patients with DED, especially for those with primary androgen deficiency.
We thank Jinqing Li and Shengqiang Zhang of the Sichuan University Library for their kind assistance in literature search.
None of the authors have any potential conflicts of interest associated with this research. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.