2021 Volume 68 Issue 4 Pages 421-428
Diabetic retinopathy (DR), one of the major complications of diabetes, can cause blindness and reduce quality of life. Dyslipidemia is reported to be associated with DR, whereas arachidonic acid may have a protective effect against DR. We aimed to investigate the association of circulating n-3 and n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) with DR. In this cross-sectional study, 190 Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes were classified as no diabetic retinopathy (NDR), simple diabetic retinopathy (SDR), or proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) including pre-proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Circulating fatty acids (FAs) were measured by gas chromatograph-mass spectrometry. Logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate the association between the levels of FAs and the presence of DR. The average age, body mass index and the duration of diabetes were 62.7 ± 12.1 years, 25.0 ± 4.5 kg/m2, and 9.8 ± 8.7 years, respectively. Twenty-seven patients were diagnosed with DR. Circulating levels of dihomo-gamma-linolenic acid (DGLA) in the NDR (n = 163), SDR (n = 13) and PDR (n = 14) groups were 28.3 ± 11.0 μg/mL, 24.4 ± 9.7 μg/mL, and 21.8 ± 6.2 μg/mL, respectively (p = 0.032). The logarithm of circulating DGLA levels was associated with the presence of DR after adjusting for covariates (OR of 1-unit increment: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.62–1.00, p = 0.049). Circulating DGLA was negatively associated with the presence of DR.
DIABETIC RETINOPATHY (DR), a common microvascular complication of diabetes that causes irreversible retinal damage, is the leading cause of vision loss among working-age adults. Approximately one-third of patients with diabetes have some degrees of DR, and one in ten will develop a vision-threatening disease [1, 2]. Therefore, the prevention and treatment of DR is one of the most important issues in the treatment of diabetes.
Dyslipidemia is correlated with the progression of DR in humans [3]. In the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study, dyslipidemia increased the risk of developing hard exudates in the macula and visual loss [4]. Excess free fatty acid metabolism results in dyslipidemia, and fatty acids (FAs) are also involved in inflammation and related chronic diseases [5, 6]. Circulating FAs are composed of saturated FAs with no double bonds, monounsaturated FAs with a single double bond, and polyunsaturated FAs (PUFAs) with multiple double bonds. The association between FAs and DR has been reported in several studies, with early research suggesting a protective role of PUFAs against DR [7, 8], and recent reports associating n-3 PUFAs with a reduced risk of DR [9, 10]. In several animal studies, an n-3 PUFA-enriched diet was protective of retinal neuron function [11, 12]. While a protective role of n-3 PUFAs against DR has been observed, there has been no significant association reported to date between n-6 PUFAs and DR. Gamma-linolenic acid (GLA) and dihomo-gamma-linolenic acid (DGLA) have been shown to induce T-regulatory cell activity and reduce the production of proinflammatory interleukin-1 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha [13]. In addition, moderate intakes of dietary n-6 PUFAs have reduced the risk of coronary heart disease [14] , while circulating n-6 PUFAs are reported to be inversely associated with total and coronary heart disease mortality [15]. Taken together, not only n-3 PUFAs but also n-6 PUFAs have demonstrated anti-inflammatory effects.
In recent years, it is clearly shown that of patients with diabetes have different circulating FAs compared to those in people without diabetes, which may contribute to the development of organ damages [16-18]. Nevertheless, the association between these circulating FAs, especially detailed composition of FAs, and diabetic retinopathy has remained unclear. Therefore, this cross-sectional study investigated the association between circulating n-3 or n-6 PUFAs and DR.
The KAMOGAWA-DM study is an ongoing prospective cohort study that began in 2014 and includes the outpatient clinics of the Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine (Kyoto, Japan) and the Kameoka Municipal Hospital (Kameoka, Japan) [19]. For the present cross-sectional study, we included patients with T2DM whose circulating FAs were measured, and excluded those who were taking eicosatetraenoic acid supplements. T2DM was diagnosed at all participating institutions based on the criteria by the American Diabetes Association [20]. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of each participating hospital (ERB-C-534, RBMR-E-466-5).
Data collectionInformation about patients’ background demographics (i.e., age, sex, disease duration, and smoking habits) was gathered from their medical records. Blood pressure was measured in the outpatient clinics. After an overnight fast, venous blood samples were collected to measure fasting plasma levels of glucose, C-peptide, triglycerides, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, creatinine, and uric acids. The level of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography and presented herein using the National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program unit.
Diagnosis of DR was made by ophthalmologists based on the Davis classification: no diabetic retinopathy (NDR), simple diabetic retinopathy (SDR), or proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) that also includes pre-proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Patients with DR were defined as those with SDR or PDR.
Estimation and assessment of the patients’ habitual food and nutrient intakeA brief-type self-administered diet history questionnaire (BDHQ) was used for the assessment of habitual food and nutrient intakes [21]. Details of the BDHQ were provided elsewhere [22]. Briefly, the BDHQ is a dietary recall to assess the respondent’s dietary intakes of 58 items over the past month. Based on the Standard Tables of Food Composition in Japan, we estimated the intakes of total energy (kcal/day), carbohydrate (g/day), protein (g/day), and total fat (g/day) using the calculation algorithm of BDHQ [22].
Measurement of circulating free fatty acidsThe composition of FAs in frozen serum samples was measured by gas chromatograph-mass spectrometry (GC/MS) with the Agilent 7890B/5977B system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Fatty acids compositions can be measured by several ways. In this study, we chose the serum, because it was the simplest method and could be applied clinically. Twenty-five μL of serum was methylated with a fatty acid methylation kit (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan). The final product was loaded onto a Varian capillary column (DB-FATWAX UI; Agilent Technologies). The capillary column used for fatty acid separation was CP-Sil 88 for FAME (100 m with an inner diameter of 0.25 mm and a membrane thickness of 0.20 μm, Agilent Technologies). The column temperature was maintained at 100°C for 4 min, increased gradually by 3°C/min to 240°C, and maintained at 240°C for 7 min. The sample was injected in the split mode with a split ratio of 5:1. Each fatty acid methyl ester was detected in selected ion monitoring mode. All results were normalized to the peak height of the internal standard C17:0 [23]. Average CV was 0.0245% (range 0.004–0.039%) (n = 3) for intra-day precision during a single analytical run and average CV 0.00237% (0.0010–0.0033%) on two separated days (n = 6) for inter-day precision. Each analytical run included a blank sample (without internal standard), and standard concentrations for calibration, and replicate sets of QC samples: 0.56 μg/mL, 1.77 μg/mL, 11.22 μg/mL, and 60.00 μg/mL and found to be linear from the concentrations of 0.56 to 60.00 μg/mL. (y = 0.159x + 0.1392).
Statistical analysisThe JMP program (ver. 13.0, SAS Institute, Cary, NC) was used for all statistical analyses. Differences with p values <0.05 were considered significant. Categorical variables were expressed as frequencies, and continuous variables were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The Chi-square test for categorical variables and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for continuous variables were used to assess the differences between groups. The difference in each circulating FA level among patients with NDR, SDR, and PDR was compared by one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s honestly significant difference test. Circulating DGLA levels were log transformed to create a more normal distribution. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of the logarithm of circulating DGLA levels and other variables based on the presence of DR were assessed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses adjusting for sex, disease duration [24], systolic blood pressure, HbA1c [25], triglycerides, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [26], omega-6 fatty acids [27, 28], smoking status [29], total energy intake [30], and statin usage [31].
Among 426 patients (234 males and 192 females) with T2DM who completed the BDHQ, circulating FAs were measured in 197 patients (96 males and 101 females). Seven patients were excluded due to the use of eicosapentaenoic acid supplements (Fig. 1).
The registration of patients.
The clinical characteristics of the 190 patients included in this study are summarized in Table 1. The average age and the level of HbA1c was 62.7 ± 12.1 years and 7.5 ± 1.6%, respectively. The frequency (percentage) of patients with NDR, SDR, and PDR was 163 (85.8%), 13 (6.8%), and 14 (7.4%), respectively.
Total (n = 190) | |
---|---|
Sex, men/women | 93/97 |
Age, yrs | 62.7 (12.1) |
Duration of diabetes, yrs | 9.8 (8.7) |
BMI, kg/m2 | 25.0 (4.5) |
Systolic blood pressure, mmHg | 135.6 (19.1) |
Diastolic blood pressure, mmHg | 81.8 (10.7) |
Fasting plasma glucose, mmol/L | 7.2 (1.6) |
Hemoglobin A1c, % | 7.5 (1.6) |
C-peptide, nmol/L | 0.6 (0.3) |
Triglycerides, mmol/L | 1.5 (0.9) |
Total cholesterol, mmol/L | 5.2 (1.0) |
High-density lipoprotein cholesterol, mmol/L | 1.5 (0.5) |
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, mmol/L | 3.0 (0.7) |
Creatinine, μmol/L | 70.9 (22.0) |
Estimated GFR, mL/min/1.73 m2 | 70.4 (18.5) |
Uric acids, mmol/L | 309.8 (77.7) |
Urine albumin to creatinine ratio, mg/gCr | 202.0 (583.0) |
Diabetic nephropathy | |
Normoalbuminuria | 115 (60.5) |
Microalbuminuria | 49 (25.8) |
Macroalbuminuria | 26 (13.7) |
Diabetic retinopathy | |
NDR | 163 (85.8) |
SDR | 13 (6.8) |
PDR | 14 (7.4) |
Diabetic neuropathy –/+ | 150/40 |
Never smoker | 120 (63.2) |
Ex-smoker | 39 (20.5) |
Current smoker | 31 (16.3) |
Energy intake/day, kcal | 1,682.5 (587.3) |
Carbohydrate intake, g/day | 209.9 (80.6) |
Protein intake, g/day | 71.7 (28.6) |
Total fat intake, g/day | 53.5 (20.0) |
Data are expressed as number (%) of subjects or mean (SD).
BMI, body mass index; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; NDR, no diabetic retinopathy; PDR, proliferative diabetic retinopathy; SDR, simple diabetic retinopathy.
The differences of circulating PUFAs among diabetic retinopathy were evaluated (Table 2, Fig. 2). There was a difference of DGLA levels among retinopathy.
Fatty acids, μg/mL | All (n = 190) | NDR (n = 163) | SDR (n = 13) | PDR (n = 14) | p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Linoleic acid (C18:2n6) | 868.1 (370.9) | 875.9 (363.5) | 792.5 (538.3) | 847.6 (281.1) | 0.723 |
γ-Linolenic acid (C18:3n6) | 5.2 (4.7) | 5.3 (4.8) | 6.1 (3.5) | 3.6 (4.3) | 0.347 |
Dihomo-gamma-linolenic acid (C20:3n6) | 27.6 (10.7) | 28.3 (11.0) | 24.4 (9.7)* | 21.8 (6.2)*,† | 0.032 |
Logarithm of dihomo-gamma-linolenic acid | 8.24 (2.23) | 8.40 (2.27) | 7.58 (2.10)* | 7.05 (1.36)*,† | 0.049 |
Arachidonic acid (C20:4n6) | 157.6 (69.6) | 160.4 (68.6) | 165.6 (68.6) | 117.1 (75.2) | 0.074 |
α-Linolenic acid (C18:3n3) | 22.2 (10.4) | 22.4 (10.7) | 20.7 (8.2) | 21.9 (8.9) | 0.842 |
Eicosatrienoic acid (C20:3n3) | 0.1 (0.9) | 0.1 (0.9) | 0.0 (0.0) | 0.0 (0.0) | 0.921 |
Eicosapentaenoic acid (C20:5n3) | 42.0 (24.5) | 42.8 (29.0) | 32.1 (14.7) | 41.6 (14.4) | 0.402 |
Docosahexaenoic acid (C22:6n3) | 146.1 (63.9) | 148.1 (65.4) | 130.0 (68.6) | 138.0 (36.9) | 0.551 |
Data are expressed as mean (SD).
p values by one-way analysis of variance analyses. The analyses of circulating PUFA levels among three groups were performed by Tukey HSD test: *, p < 0.05 versus NDR; †, p < 0.05 versus SDR.
NDR, no diabetic retinopathy; PDR, proliferative diabetic retinopathy; PUFAs, polyunsaturated fatty acids; SDR, simple diabetic retinopathy.
Circulating PUFAs of the study patients
The analyses of circulating PUFA levels among three groups were performed by one-way ANOVA; *, p < 0.05.
NDR, no diabetic retinopathy; PDR, proliferative diabetic retinopathy; PUFAs, polyunsaturated fatty acids; SDR, simple diabetic retinopathy.
DGLA was negatively associated with the presence of DR in both the univariate logistic regression analysis (OR of 1-unit increment: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.62–0.96, p = 0.020) and multivariate logistic regression analysis after adjusting for covariates (OR of 1-unit increment: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.53–0.99, p = 0.043) (Table 3).
Univariate | Multivariate | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Odds ratio (95% CI) | p-value | Odds ratio (95% CI) | p-value | |
Men | 1.15 (0.51–2.59) | 0.745 | 1.54 (0.46–5.16) | 0.484 |
Disease duration, yrs | 1.05 (1.01–1.10) | 0.015 | 1.04 (0.99–1.10) | 0.117 |
Systolic blood pressure, mmHg | 1.02 (0.99–1.04) | 0.100 | 1.02 (0.99–1.04) | 0.143 |
Hemoglobin A1c, % | 1.35 (1.08–1.69) | 0.009 | 1.23 (0.94–1.61) | 0.145 |
Triglycerides, mmol/L | 0.62 (0.34–1.14) | 0.124 | 0.71 (0.29–1.75) | 0.447 |
Total cholesterol, mmol/L | 0.83 (0.55–1.25) | 0.371 | 0.84 (0.49–1.46) | 0.552 |
HDL-cholesterol, mmol/L | 1.23 (0.53–2.88) | 0.631 | 0.91 (0.25–3.30) | 0.888 |
Omega-6 fatty acids, μg/mL | 0.99 (0.99–1.00) | 0.425 | 1.00 (0.99–1.00) | 0.335 |
Never smoker | 1.00 (Reference) | — | 1.00 (Reference) | — |
Ex-smoker | 1.22 (0.37–4.04) | 0.746 | 2.28 (0.64–8.19) | 0.205 |
Current smoker | 2.84 (1.13–7.13) | 0.026 | 0.92 (0.20–4.12) | 0.912 |
Total energy, kcal/day | 1.00 (0.99–1.00) | 0.571 | 0.84 (0.49–1.46) | 0.889 |
Statin usage | 2.08 (0.87–4.93) | 0.098 | 2.15 (0.76–6.03) | 0.147 |
Log dihomo-gamma-linolenic acid | 0.76 (0.62–0.96) | 0.020 | 0.72 (0.53–0.99) | 0.038 |
Multivariate analysis was adjusted for was adjusted for sex, disease duration, systolic blood pressure, hemoglobin A1c, triglycerides, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, omega-6 fatty acids, smoking status, total energy, and statin usage.
In the present study of 190 Japanese individuals with T2DM from the KAMOGAWA-DM cohort study, we investigated the association between circulating n-3 or n-6 PUFAs and DR, and revealed that circulating DGLA is negatively associated with the presence of DR.
Possible explanations of the inverse association between circulating DGLA levels and the presence of DR were explored. DGLA, an essential fatty acid, is n-6 PUFA with 20 carbons derived in vivo from linolenic acid. DGLA is converted to another n-6 PUFA with 20 carbons, arachidonic acid (AA) [32, 33]. Both DGLA and AA are substrates of the lipid-peroxidizing enzyme cyclooxygenase (COX) which metabolizes DGLA and AA to various bioactive metabolites, such as the 1 and 2 series prostaglandins (PGs1 and PGs2), through a series of free radical reactions. PGs2 are generally known as pro-inflammatory metabolites, whereas PGs1 possess anti-inflammatory effects [34]. Prostaglandins E1 (PGE1), which is a type of PGs1, could inhibit the proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells and the adhesion of vascular cells, and the development of atherosclerosis [35, 36]. Furthermore, DGLA is metabolized by the 15-lipoxygenase into 15-(S)-hydroxy-8,11,13-eicosatrienoic acid (15-HETrE) [37] , which has been reported to reduce the development of DR because it inhibits the activity of vasoconstrictors and metabolites of AA including thromboxanes (TXs) and leukotrienes (LTs) [38, 39]. Reduced plasma and vitreal concentrations of PGE1, as well as increased levels of TXs and LTs have been reported in patients with DR [40-42]. Therefore, the imbalance between the vasodilators and platelet anti-aggregators (e.g. PGE1) and the vasoconstrictors and platelet aggregators (e.g. TXs and LTs) may lead to ischemic vasoconstriction of retinal vessels and enhanced platelet aggregation.
Thus, the oxidative metabolites of DGLA, including PGE1 and 15-HETrE, have demonstrated clinical efficacy in a variety of diseases including suppressing chronic inflammation [37] , promoting vasodilation [43], lowering blood pressure [44] , and inhibiting smooth muscle cell proliferation associated with atherosclerotic plaque development [45]. In this study, circulating levels of DGLA in patients with DR were significantly lower than those without (patients with DR: 7.31 ± 1.74, patients without DR: 8.40 ± 2.27, p = 0.018). Moreover, the logarithm of circulating DGLA levels and the logarithm of urine albumin excretion tended to be negatively correlated with each other (β = –0.100, p = 0.171). As mentioned above, the oxidative metabolites of DGLA, including PGE1 and 15-HETrE, have ameliorative effects on various diseases, and a similar mechanism was thought to have occurred in nephropathy.
Our study has a strength, and that is that the results of fatty acid measurements are extremely robust. At first, all results were normalized to the peak height of the internal standard C17:0, and the results were quite robust. Average CV of three samples of intra-day was 0.0245% (0.004–0.039%) and average CV of six samples of inter-day precision was 0.00237% (0.0010–0.0033%) and linearity was from 0.56 μg/mL to 60.00 μg/mL (Supplementary Table 1). There are three major limitations in this study that could be addressed in future research. First, this study was a cross-sectional design, and further research should be conducted to establish the causal relationship between low circulating DGLA levels and DR. Second, the sample size in this study was relatively small and future large-scale studies are warranted. Third, fatty acids compete with each other in the metabolism, absorption, and incorporation to cells, therefore, it was better to use the proportion of specific fatty acid to total fatty acids to total fatty acids. However, many previous reports have performed various assessments using absolute values of circulating fatty acids [46-49], and significant associations with various diseases have been shown in those reports. Fourth, omega-6 fatty acids are metabolized by a single metabolic pathway, and it is unclear why only DGLA was significantly associated with the presence of DR. This is a topic for future research.
In conclusion, this study was the first to demonstrate that circulating levels of DGLA in patients with DR were significantly lower than those without. It is important to conduct future prospective study to investigate the relationship between circulating DGLA levels and incident DR, and explore the mechanisms that contribute to the difference between dietary and circulating DGLA.
We thank all of the staff members in Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine. We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.
Yoshitaka Hashimoto has received grants from Asahi Kasei Pharma, personal fees from Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., personal fees from Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corp., personal fees from Sanofi K.K., personal fees from Novo Nordisk Pharma Ltd., outside the submitted work. Takafumi Senmaru has received personal fees from Ono Pharma Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co, Astellas Pharma Inc., Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd., Sanofi K.K., MSD K.K., Kowa Pharma Co., Ltd., Taisho Toyama Pharma Co., Ltd., Takeda Pharma Co., Ltd., Kissei Pharma Co., Ltd., Novo Nordisk Pharma Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K.K. outside the submitted work. Emi Ushigome has received grants from the Japanese Study Group for Physiology and Management of Blood Pressure, the Astellas Foundation for Research on Metabolic Disorders (Grant number: 4024). Donated Fund Laboratory of Diabetes therapeutics is an endowment department, supported with an unrestricted grant from Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and received personal fees from AstraZeneca plc, Astellas Pharma Inc., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Kyowa Hakko Kirin Company Ltd., Kowa Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., MSD K.K., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corp., Novo Nordisk Pharma Ltd., Taisho Toyama Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd., and Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd., outside the submitted work. Masahide Hamaguchi has received grants from Asahi Kasei Pharma, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Sanofi K.K., Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Astellas Pharma Inc., Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd., Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd., Novo Nordisk Pharma Ltd., and Eli Lilly Japan K.K., outside the submitted work. Mai Asano received personal fees from Novo Nordisk Pharma Ltd., Abbott Japan Co., Ltd., AstraZeneca plc, Kowa Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., outside the submitted work. Masahiro Yamazaki reports personal fees from MSD K.K., Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd., Kowa Company, Limited, AstraZeneca PLC, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Kowa Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Ono Pharma Co., Ltd., outside the submitted work. Michiaki Fukui has received grants from Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd., Kissei Pharma Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co, Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Sanofi K.K., Takeda Pharma Co., Ltd., Astellas Pharma Inc., MSD K.K., Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd., Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd., Kowa Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Novo Nordisk Pharma Ltd., Ono Pharma Co., Ltd., Sanwa Kagaku Kenkyusho Co., Ltd. Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Taisho Pharma Co., Ltd., Terumo Co., Teijin Pharma Ltd., Nippon Chemiphar Co., Ltd., and Johnson & Johnson K.K. Medical Co., Abbott Japan Co., Ltd., and received personal fees from Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd., Kissei Pharma Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corp., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Sanofi K.K., Takeda Pharma Co., Ltd., Astellas Pharma Inc., MSD K.K., Kyowa Kirin Co., Ltd., Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co., Ltd., Kowa Pharma Co., Ltd., Novo Nordisk Pharma Ltd., Ono Pharma Co., Ltd., Sanwa Kagaku Kenkyusho Co., Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Taisho Pharma Co., Ltd., Bayer Yakuhin, Ltd., AstraZeneca K.K., Mochida Pharma Co., Ltd., Abbott Japan Co., Ltd., Medtronic Japan Co., Ltd., Arkley Inc., Teijin Pharma Ltd. and Nipro Cor., outside the submitted work.
None.