Bulletin of the Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute
Online ISSN : 2189-9363
Print ISSN : 0916-4405
ISSN-L : 0916-4405
Special Feature "2013 debris flow hazard and forest in Izu-Oshima Island"
Woody biomass in the vicinity of a slope failure site occurred on the October 16, 2013, in Izu-Oshima Island
Hiroki ITÔTetsuya MATSUIHiroyuki TOBITATetsuya IGARASHIAkiho OGAWAYojiro MATSUURA
Author information
RESEARCH REPORT / TECHNICAL REPORT OPEN ACCESS

2016 Volume 15 Issue 1-2 Pages 21-30

Details
Abstract

To offer essential data to evaluate how the forest affected the slope failure in Izu Oshima Island, we estimated both above- and below-ground biomass per unit area for each vegetation type. Aerial photographs and vegetation map were overlaid on GIS, and the vegetation types at the slope failure site were estimated. Seven quadrats were established adjacent to the slope failure sites, and the diameter at breast height was recorded for each tree stems more than or equal to 10cm in circumference. The former vegetation types before the slope failure determined by vegetation maps were as follows: Cerasus speciosa (hereafter Cerasus) forest, Eurya japonica - Ilex crenata var.hachijoensis (hereafter Eurya-Ilex) forest, and Castanopsis sieboldii (hereafter Castanopsis) forest. The estimated above-ground biomass was the highest in the Castanopsis forest (276t/ha), followed by the Cerasus (145–183t/ha) and Eurya-Ilex (97–197t/ha) forests. The T/R ratios (top weight / root weight) were 2.9–3.8 and 2.7–2.8 in the Cerasus and Eurya-Ilex forests, respectively. Although there was no difference in aboveground biomass between the Cerasus and Eurya-Ilex forest, the T/R ratio tended to be higher in the Cerasus forest. In this study, the woody biomass (raw weights) at the time of the failure was estimated. The results should be useful for evaluating how much load the biomass weigh on the ground of collapsed.

Information related to the author
© 2016 Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute
Previous article Next article
feedback
Top