Food Safety
Online ISSN : 2187-8404
ISSN-L : 2187-8404
Risk Assessment Report
Paraquat (Pesticides)
Food Safety Commission of Japan
Author information
JOURNAL OPEN ACCESS FULL-TEXT HTML

2022 Volume 10 Issue 4 Pages 140-147

Details
Abstract

Food Safety Commission of Japan (FSCJ) conducted a risk assessment of a bipyridinium herbicide, paraquat (CAS No. 1910-42-5), based on results from various studies. Major adverse effects of paraquat in experimental animals were observed in body weight (suppressed weight gain), lungs (increased weight, alveolar epithelium hyperplasia, and pneumonia), kidneys (renal tubule dilatation) and eyes (cataract in rats and dogs). The effects on the lung were considered to be the most critical endpoints in the assessment. Neither carcinogenicity, effects on fertility, teratogenicity, genotoxicity, or immunotoxicity was observed. FSCJ reasonably concluded no obvious concern of paraquat-residue in foods to yield neurotoxicity through human dietary exposure, as long as paraquat is applied following the registered standard use of the pesticide. The lowest no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) obtained from all the studies was 0.45 mg paraquat ion*/kg bw per day in one-year chronic toxicity study in dogs. FSCJ specified an acceptable daily intake (ADI) of 0.0045 mg paraquat ion/kg bw per day by applying a safety factor of 100 to the NOAEL. FSCJ judged these effects also as the end-point of the acute reference dose (ARfD). The lowest NOAEL was 0.45 mg paraquat ion/kg bw per day in one-year chronic toxicity study in dogs. For potential adverse effects of a single oral administration of paraquat, FSCJ specified an ARfD to be 0.0045 mg paraquat ion/kg bw by applying a safety factor of 100 to the NOAEL.

Content from these authors
© 2022 Food Safety Commission, Cabinet Office, Government of Japan

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.ja
Previous article
feedback
Top