『従容録』と『隰州古仏頌古称提』の比較研究――第二則を中心に――

抄録

This paper undertakes a comprehensive comparative analysis of the Shōyōroku 従容録 and its companion piece, the Shisshū kobutsu-juko shōtei 隰州古仏頌古称提, both authored by Menzan Zuihō 面山瑞方 （1683–1769） and Tensan Ebyō 天産慧苗 （? –1803）. In parallel, our investigation seeks to shed light on a specific facet of the historical reception and acceptance of the Shōyōroku by examining the Shisshū kobutsu-juko shōtei-monge 隰州古仏頌古称提聞解, which serves as an annotated commentary on the Shisshū kobutsu juko shōtei.

Within the Shisshū kobutsu-juko shōtei-monge, we find a wealth of references to the Shōyōroku. Nevertheless, the presence of multiple textual versions casts doubt on whether the original authors’ intentions are faithfully preserved. These variants can be classified into three distinct categories. Our study has successfully pinpointed statements expressing dissatisfaction with the Shōyōroku across all three versions, shedding light on the shared perspectives of Menzan Zuihō and his disciples. Furthermore, an in-depth comparison of the second chapter of both the Shōyōroku and the Shisshū kobutsu-juko shōtei reveals several additional disparities, encompassing the evaluations of figures such as Bodhidharma 達摩 and Emperor Wu 武帝, as well as the interpretation of the gāthā 偈頌.

Notably, our study extends its comparative inquiry to the second chapter, ultimately concluding that only partial distinctions exist among the various versions. However, to achieve a more comprehensive evaluation, further research is imperative, including an exploration of additional chapters.