印度學佛教學研究
Online ISSN : 1884-0051
Print ISSN : 0019-4344
ISSN-L : 0019-4344
『中辺分別論釈疏』の再校訂のために
第三章真実品えを中心に
金 才權
著者情報
ジャーナル フリー

2006 年 54 巻 2 号 p. 1071-1068,1346

詳細
抄録

There is only one manuscript of Sthiramati's Madhyantavibhagatika in existence, but it is incomplete, and over one third of it is missing. Yamaguchi, while editing the text, restored the incomplete parts by translating from the Tibetan text into Sanskrit.
In this way, Yamaguchi's edition of Sthiramati's tika greatly contributed to research on Yogacara Buddhism and, although it was highly appreciated, the portions translated into Sanskrit were not always acceptable, as pointed out by Nagao and de Jong.
In fact, studying the original manuscript, I felt that the quoted mula-text which is missing in Yamaguchi's Sthiramati's tika could be restored by using Nagao's edition of the Madhyantavibhagabhasya. In addition, there are misreadings of the manuscript and improper translations from Tibetan into Sanskrit. Hence, these portions of Yamaguchi's edition could be amended by careful reading and using parallel passages of the manuscript.
Therefore, I believe that by studying carefully the existing manuscript and by using parallel passages in the Tibetan translation, it is possible to correct the incorrect portions and create an improved text. Thus, I think that it is possible to revise and re-edit the text.

著者関連情報
© 日本印度学仏教学会
前の記事 次の記事
feedback
Top