顎顔面補綴
Online ISSN : 2435-0389
Print ISSN : 0389-4045
研究論文
下顎骨切除後の残存骨または再建に用いた移植骨に埋入した骨結合型インプラント周囲骨のパノラマX線写真による評価
内田 雄基井原 功一郎山下 佳雄重松 正仁辻 光弘後藤 昌昭
著者情報
ジャーナル フリー

2006 年 29 巻 2 号 p. 60-68

詳細
抄録
The authors compared the marginal bone loss (MBL) of 56 osseointegrated implants (implants) placed in residual or grafted bone following mandibular resection in 20 patients: a residual bone group (RBG) consisting of 7 patients and 17 implants; a corticocancellous iliac bone block group (CBBG) consisting of 7 and 21; and a particulated cancellous iliac bone and marrow group (PCBMG) consisting of 7 and 18. (One patient is counted twice.)
Panoramic radiographs were taken at implant placement (t 1), prosthetic loading (t 2), and final follow-up (t 3). The implant lengths (P 0) and the distances from the alveolar crest to the apex of the implant at the mesial and distal sides of the implant neck were measured. MBL represented the means of differences for corrected distances (using the P 0) at the two sides for pre-loading (t 2-t 1) and post-loading (t 3-t 2). Paired t-tests were used to determine intra-group differences. and ANOVA for inter-groups.
The following results were obtained :
RBG (t 2-t 1): 0.4 mm (mean) with 2.3 (SD); RBG (t 3-t 2): 1.6 mm with 1.4; CBBG (t 2-t 1): 0.1 mm with 1.7; CBBG (t 3-t 2) :1.4 mm with 1.4; PCBMG (t 2-t 1):0.6 mm with 2.0; PCBMG (t 3-t 2): 0.9 mm with 1.9. No significance (p>0.05) existed between t 2-t 1 and t 3-t 2 (intra-group except CBBG (P=0.02)), nor for t 2-t 1 or t 3-t 2 (inter-group) (p>0.05). This study revealed no difference in resorption between residual and grafted bone.
著者関連情報
© 2006 一般社団法人日本顎顔面補綴学会
前の記事 次の記事
feedback
Top