In the “Streaks” research, examinations were conducted by performance results of athlete in the game. Gilovich et al. (1985) couldnʼt establish the existence of “streaks”. Other research were same results (Silva,1988; Adams, 1992; Albright,1993; Koehler and Conley, 2003; Clark,2005a; Clark,2005b).They canʼt establish from performance results of athlete. Thus, Asai and Sagawa (2013) were conduct research by new research method. Their method was used video-experiments with questionnaire. Participants were looked at volleyball game by video, and answered degree of “Streaks” in the questionnaire when every rally end. They noticed that “Streaks” relation with game situation. By the way, Asai and Sagawa(2013) were researched “Streaks” about one team. But, “Streaks” is measured by game situation of two teams. Because Teduka (2008) said that “Streaks moved closer to one team. ”. This means there is one “Streaks” in a game. Asai and Sagawa (2013) indicated that there is two “Streaks” in a game. Thus, Which team has “Streaks” ?
We improved method of Asai and Sagawa(2013) and used investigation of “Streaks” by improved method of Asai and Sagawa(2013). ANOVA with the aim is to reveal difference between every rally in detail. As a result, we indicate that when team of no “Streaks” get one point, “Streaks” will moved closer to team of no “Streaks”. This frame of mind (i.e. there is one “Streaks” in a game) is equitably view. This is new perspective of “Streaks”.
