抄録
In this paper we examine physicalistic panpsychism as one of the
trends of modern philosophy of mind. We regard it as modern
panpsychism and put it into dialogue with the classical philosophy of
panpsychism up to the first half of the 20th century. In this context, we
will clarify the significance of James and Nishida as panpsychical
philosophies.
The question of why mind, a completely different kind of mode of
existence, arises from matter is the “hard problem of consciousness”,
which has become a hot topic in recent years, and panpsychism was
presented as one of its solutions. Panpsychism, however, has also
presented problems such as opposition of mind against physical closure or
difficulty in compounding units of consciousness.
In contrast, W. James, who is included in the panpsychism of the first
half of the 20th century, positioned the physical only as the objective
aspect of reality. He proposed a stream of experience prior to rational
thought executing contradictory opposition between realities, and thus
tried to solve the problem of combination of consciousness. We can call
this a contradictory de-rationalistic panpsychism. Nishida also advocated
a contradictory self-identifying panpsychism that places the action of
identifying metaphysical contradictions at the root of reality.
While these represent solutions to some of the problems of modern
panpsychism, they also leave the question of how to reconcile
panpsychism with physicalism.