Journal of Prosthodontic Research
Online ISSN : 1883-9207
Print ISSN : 1883-1958
ISSN-L : 1883-1958

この記事には本公開記事があります。本公開記事を参照してください。
引用する場合も本公開記事を引用してください。

Selective Laser Sintering versus Selective Laser Melting and Computer Aided Design – Computer Aided Manufacturing in Double Crowns Retention
Luciana GogutaDiana Lungeanu Radu NegruMihaela BirdeanuAnca JivanescuCosmin Sinescu
著者情報
ジャーナル オープンアクセス 早期公開

論文ID: JPOR_2019_556

この記事には本公開記事があります。
詳細
抄録

Purpose: This in vitro study aimed at ascertaining the retention forces for telescopic crowns fabricated with Selective Laser Manufacturing (SLM) and Selective Laser Sintering (SLS) additive technologies, and Computer Aided Design – Computer Aided Manufacturing (CAD–CAM) subtractive technology, by using suitable materials for each.
Materials and Methods: Full-factorial design was employed for experimental testing, considering the following three factors: (a) inner crown material ‒ technology (zirconia ‒ CAD-CAM; metal-alloy ‒ SLS; metal-alloy ‒ SLM); (b) tooth type (canine or molar); (c) wet vs. dry conditions (i.e. either with or without artificial saliva). The roughness of the inner crowns was analyzed through atomic force microscopy. Three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied for statistical analysis, followed by Tukey's post-hoc comparisons between the crown types.
Results: The retention force mean values were between 3.8 N (dry, SLM) and 14.8 N (artificial saliva, SLS), with statistically significant (p<0.001) differences between the three types of inner crowns and interaction with the tooth type. No significant interaction was found between crown or tooth types and the wet vs. dry testing conditions. The zirconia crowns' retention force was significantly (p<0.001) higher compared to similar SLM crowns, with 95% CI (3.62; 5.55) N for the differences. Zirconia was sig nificantly (p<0.001) less retentive compared to similar SLS crow ns, with 95% CI (-5.99; -4.06) N for the differences. The roughness decrease and subsequent loss of retention force was the largest in zirconia.
Conclusions: The SLS inner crowns showed the best retention, followed by zirconia and SLM inner crows.

著者関連情報

この記事はクリエイティブ・コモンズ [表示 - 非営利 4.0 国際]ライセンスの下に提供されています。
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0), which allows users to distribute and copy the material in any format as long as credit is given to the Japan Prosthodontic Society. It should be noted however, that the material cannot be used for commercial purposes.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.ja
feedback
Top