2019 Volume 56 Issue 1 Pages 27-31
Improving feed efficiency is important for decreasing feed cost in poultry production, because feed account for approximately 70% of the total production costs. The selection of feed efficiency may affect other important economic traits. Therefore, the objectives of this present study was to evaluate the relationships of the residual feed intake (RFI) with live body weight, carcass weight, carcass composition, and size of small intestines in a population of F2 Pekin ducks. Nine-hundred and eighty F2 ducks were derived from a cross between 40 Pekin ducks and 10 Mallard ducks. The results showed no significant correlation of RFI with live body weight and eviscerated carcass weight. RFI had negative effects on breast meat weight and gizzard weight. A positive correlation of RFI with abdominal fat weight, skin weight, and jejunum length was detected. Our results indicated that the selection of RFI could improve the feed efficiency of ducks without affecting their carcass compositions.
Feed intake and feed efficiency are economically important traits for ducks. Improvement in feed efficiency would reduce the amount of feed required for growth, the production cost, and the amount of nitrogenous waste produced (Zhang and Aggrey, 2003). A commonly used measure is feed conversion ratio (FCR; i.e., feed intake: body weight gain), but current genetic selection programs for reducing feed costs in farm animals are focused on residual feed intake (RFI), because selection on FCR can lead to unfavorable changes in the component traits (Crews, 2005).
RFI is defined as the difference between the actual feed intake and the expected feed requirements for maintenance and gain of body weight (Koch et al., 1963). Previous studies have shown that RFI is moderately heritable, with values of heritability ranging from 0.14 to 0.49 (Pakdel et al., 2005; Aggrey et al., 2010; Begli et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2017).
In contrast to FCR, RFI is independent of growth and maturity patterns. Therefore, RFI should be a more sensitive and precise measurement of feed utilization (Robinson and Oddy, 2004), and presently, an increasing number of farms have been choosing RFI instead of FCR for reducing animal feed costs. Genetic selection for reducing RFI will decrease feed intake and improve feed efficiency without affecting growth performance negatively (Herd et al., 2004; Mrode and Kennedy, 2010). In poultry, growth traits have made a great progress through genetic selection; a 50–60% increase in growth rate has been attributed to genetic selection (Robins and Phillips, 2011; Drouilhet et al., 2014). Phenotypic and genetic selection for feed efficiency could have significant effects on carcass compositions. However, there is lack of information describing the effect of selection for altering RFI on carcass compositions traits of ducks, and its effects on carcass traits need to be better understood. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to investigate the relationship of RFI with carcass composition and small intestinal length in an F2 duck population.
The present study was conducted at the Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), Beijing, China. The care and use of all the ducks used in this experiment were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Institute of Animal Sciences of the CAAS. The F1 resource population of ducks came from a cross between 40 female Pekin ducks and 10 male Mallard ducks. Pekin duck is a famous breed, with characteristics of fast growth and excellent fattening. The Mallard duck is a native duck with slow growth and high immune capacities that are distributed in the southeastern part of China. The F1 birds were generated by using either breed as male and female parents. A total of 980 F2 ducks were finally used in this experiment.
The ducks were fed on the floor for the first two weeks. Thereafter, all the ducks were transferred to individual cages until they were sacrificed. For the first three days after hatching, the ducklings were exposed to continuous lighting (24 L:0 D); subsequently, a 20 L:4D light regimen was used until the ducks were sacrificed for analysis. Ingredient composition and chemical composition of feedstuff used in this study is presented in Table 1. The ducks were not vaccinated against any disease. Feed and water were provided ad libitum. Feed intake and body weight of each individual were measured every week from 15 days to 70 days, and the carcass traits were assessed after all the ducks were slaughtered at 70 days of age.
| Ingredient | Diets (0 to 14 d) | Diets (15 to 70 d) |
|---|---|---|
| Corn | 58.23 | 59.22 |
| Wheat bran | 11.94 | |
| Soybean meal | 36.17 | 25.32 |
| Soybean oil | 2.03 | |
| Limestone | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Dicalcium phosphate | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Sodium chloride | 0.30 | 0.30 |
| DL-Methionine | 0.17 | 0.12 |
| Vitamin and trace mineral premix | 0.501 | 0.502 |
| Total | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| Calculated composition | ||
| Metabolizable energy, c kcal/kg | 2,900 | 2,700 |
| Crude protein | 21 | 18 |
| Methionine | 0.50 | 0.40 |
| Cystine | 0.36 | 0.32 |
| Lysine | 1.10 | 0.90 |
| Calcium | 0.88 | 0.86 |
| Nonphytate phosphorus | 0.39 | 0.38 |
At 10 weeks of age, the 980 ducks studied were fasted for 12 h before they were slaughtered. The slaughtered ducks were defeathered, and the carcass weights including body, breast meat, wing, leg meat, and skin were measured and recorded. In addition, the length of duodenum, jejunum, and ileum were measured, and gizzard, liver, and abdominal fat were weighed. The length of duodenum, extending from the pylorus to pancreatic loop, jejunum, extending from the pancreatic loop to distal caecum, and ileum, extending from distal caecum to the ileocaecal junction were measured.
Statistical AnalysesRFI values were obtained using the PROC REG procedure in SAS software package (SAS System, version 9.2; SAS Institute, Cary, NC). The Pearson product–moment correlation procedure in SAS was used to analyze the relationship of RFI with live body weight, carcass compositions, and small intestinal traits. RFI was calculated according to Zhang et al. (2017).
RFI=FI−(a+b1×BW700.75+b2×BWG),
where, FI is the feed intake, BW700.75 is the 70 d old metabolic weight, BWG is the weight gain from 3 weeks to 10 weeks of age, a is the intercept, and b1 and b2 are partial regression coefficients of FI on BW700.75 and BWG, respectively.
Table 2 shows the effect of sex and the regression of RFI on live body weight and carcass traits. The female ducks had significantly lower body weight, eviscerated carcass weight, breast meat weight, skin weight, wing weight, and leg meat weight than the male ducks had. RFI was not significantly correlated with live body weight, eviscerated carcass weight, leg meat weight, and wing weight. RFI had a significant positive correlation with skin weight and a significant negative correlation (P<0.05) with breast meat weight, indicating that skin weight increases and breast meat weight decreases when RFI increases.
| Item | Number | FI (g) | RFI | BW (g) | ECW (g) | BM (g) | Skin (g) | Wing (g) | Leg (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 495 | 4892 | 1.15 | 1978±251.36a | 1592±162.38a | 177.01±31.88a | 388.00±86.35a | 151.14±18.70a | 186.89±28.40a |
| Female | 485 | 4872 | −0.02 | 1804±242.97b | 1463±148.56b | 166.78±30.05b | 363.47±92.02b | 138.62±17.36b | 170.76±25.00b |
| P-value | 0.576 | 0.673 | 0.234 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| RFIA | — | 0.494 | — | 0.004 | 0.046 | −0.298 | 0.449 | −0.045 | −0.008 |
| P-value | — | 0.000 | — | 0.922 | 0.303 | 0.013 | 0.000 | 0.414 | 0.877 |
FI: feed intake; BW: body weight; ECW: eviscerated carcass weight; BM: breast meat.
The effect of sex and RFI on carcass composition traits are presented in Table 3. The gizzard weight, liver weight, and heart weight were significantly higher in the males than the females (P<0.05). Abdominal fat weight and spleen weight showed no significant differences between male and female ducks. RFI had significant negative effects on gizzard weight, whereas it had a significant positive effect on abdominal fat weights (P<0.05). These results suggest that high feed conversion efficient ducks had larger gizzards and lesser abdominal fat weight.
| Item | Number | Liver (g) | Gizzard (g) | Heart (g) | Abdominal fat (g) | Spleen (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 495 | 37.61±7.44a | 55.80±9.57a | 12.03±1.83a | 32.30±11.78 | 2.21±0.31 |
| Female | 485 | 33.71±5.92b | 48.33±8.71b | 11.32±1.72b | 32.75±13.65 | 2.15±0.23 |
| P-value | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.74 | 0.56 | |
| RFIA | 0.130 | −0.262 | 0.188 | 0.422 | 0.001 | |
| P-value | 0.117 | 0.025 | 0.061 | 0.000 | 0.323 |
The effect of sex and RFI on small intestinal morphometric measurements are shown in Table 4. The jejunum length of the male ducks was significantly longer than that of female ducks (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the length of the duodenum and ileum between male and female ducks. RFI had a significant positive correlation on jejunum length.
| Item | Number | Duodenum length (cm) | Jejunum length (cm) | Ileum length (cm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 495 | 27.08±2.84 | 119.67±13.20a | 14.96±1.50 |
| Female | 485 | 26.19±2.78 | 115.84±13.24b | 14.24±1.48 |
| P-value | 0.158 | 0.024 | 0.086 | |
| RFIA | 0.097 | 0.111 | 0.052 | |
| P-value | 0.076 | 0.044 | 0.345 |
In poultry, 90% of the phenotypic changes in the past 50 years were due to selection process on the genetic backgrounds (Havenstein et al., 2003). RFI is a heritable trait and is closely related to production efficiency. In some studies, heritability for RFI was estimated to vary from 0.44 to 0.83 in growing ducks (Drouilhet et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2017). In order to improve the feed efficiency of poultry, the genetic selection of RFI traits has attracted more and more attention. In the present study, the effects of selection for altering RFI on the carcass and small intestine traits of 980 F2 ducks were analyzed to provide more detailed information on the correlations of RFI with the production traits of ducks, which has been seldom reported.
Body weight and Carcass CharacteristicsThe results indicated that there were sex-specific differences in almost all the traits studied. The male ducks had significantly higher body weight, carcass weight, breast meat weight, and sebum weight than those of female ducks, which is consistent with the findings on chickens (Faria et al., 2010). Evidently, selection on RFI would affect the related traits. There was no significant correlation between body weight, eviscerated carcass traits, and RFI. RFI, a term proposed by Koch et al. (1963), refers to the fraction of feed intake that is not explained by the maintenance and production requirements without affecting the performances. Previous studies confirmed that RFI is independent of weight and growth efficiency (Archer et al., 1998; Basarab et al., 2003; Aggrey et al., 2010). Zhang et al. (2017) found similar results for body weight between low- and high-RFI groups of ducks. Therefore, selection on RFI can improve animal feed efficiency without affecting their feed intake and growth rates.
Carcass CompositionThe results showed that there was a significant difference in gizzard, heart, and liver weights between female and male ducks in the F2 population. There was a significant negative correlation between RFI and gizzard weight, and a positive correlation between RFI and abdominal fat weight. The negative correlations between gizzard weight and RFI showed that ducks with high feed conversion usually had larger gizzards. Larger gizzard may enhance digestive ability and improve intestinal absorption efficiency. Stimulating the development of the gizzard may improve the function of the small intestine through better feed flow regulation (Svihus, 2014).
Abdominal fat is considered a waste product and is one of the main compartments for fat deposition in ducks. Therefore, reducing the deposition of abdominal fat is a strategy of reducing the cost of production. Our data showed that female ducks had slightly higher abdominal fat deposits than male ducks had; however, this difference was not significant. Similar results were reported in chickens (Bogosavljevic-Boskovic et al., 2010). In the present study, there was a significant positive correlation between abdominal fat deposition and RFI, indicating that abdominal fat of the ducks with high feed conversion efficiency and low RFI was significantly lower than those of the ducks with less feed conversion efficiency and high RFI.
Small Intestinal Morphometric CharacteristicsThe early development and function of the digestive tract affect the growth and subsequent performance of ducks. The present study shows that the effect of sex on the length of jejunum is significant, and that the length of jejunum is positively correlated with RFI. Begli et al. (2017) reported that total intestine length was longer in male chickens than in female chickens. Jejunum is the main site for nutrient absorption. Previous studies have shown that protein, fat, and starch are absorbed mainly in the jejunum (Riesenfeld et al., 1980; Sklan and Hurwitz, 1980), and that water and minerals are mainly absorbed in the ileum (Svihus, 2014). In addition, Jackson and Diamond (1996) reported that increased intestinal length improves nutrient absorption.
This study suggested that selection on RFI could affect carcass composition traits, and have positive effects on feed intake and jejunum length of ducks. The ducks with high RFI had higher feed intake and a stronger ability to deposit abdominal fat. The present study indicated that selection for low RFI could be useful for reducing the cost of feeding and improving the efficiency of production, which provides insights into the effects of RFI on production traits of ducks, and provides a theoretical basis for the application of RFI in duck breeding.
This research was sponsored by the Earmarked Fund for China's Agriculture Research System (CARS-42) and the Science and Technology Innovation Project of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (cxgc-ias-09).
