抄録
We find the paired terms-personal : impersonal-often used in the recent sociological literature. Like many other terms these have diverse meanings according to the context, in which they are used. So we should try to define them accaratary and systematically. For this purpose we fined the clue in parsons' “pattern variables of role expectation, ” especially those of Universalism, : particularism, specificity ; diffuseness and affective neutrality; affectivity, From them we derive two combinations, i.e. particularism-diffuseness-affectivity and universalism-specificity-affective neutrality and the formes as “personal” in contrast to the latter as “impersonal.” This problem can not adequately be analyzed, we believe, without a definite conception of man as “total human being.” In this sense the paper deals with the relation of organization and man in its modern phase.
