抄録
The aim of this article is to consider the implications for "Science of Science, Technology and Innovation Policy" from the viewpoints of Policy Sciences. Policy Study was started as "Policy Sciences" to improve policymaking system by providing two knowledge, knowledge of process and knowledge in process. At first, Policy Study had the "preference for automation", which remove politics from policymaking process. Several reforms, such as PPBS, have been done, but these reforms could not succeed. Facing these failures, Policy Study has tried to develop new analytical frameworks based on post positivism. And these experiences showed the implications for "Science of Science, Technology and Innovation Policy", especially on three phases. First, on the phase of analysis of policy problem, Policy Study examined the methods and process of problem structuring, and also pointed out the importance of framing to recognize and define the problem. Second, on the phase of making of policy alternatives, Policy Study pointed out the existence of three types of knowledge to form policy alternatives and developed the frameworks of policy analysis to use local knowledge. Third, on the phase of knowledge utilization, Policy Study showed the notion of policy learning and examined the institutional constraints on policymaking.
