Journal of UOEH
Online ISSN : 2187-2864
Print ISSN : 0387-821X
ISSN-L : 0387-821X
日本におけるDPCデータを用いた早期子宮体がんに対する開腹手術・腹腔鏡手術・ロボット支援手術の周術期合併症の比較:後ろ向きコホート研究
青山 瑶子渡邉 文夫得津 慶金城 泰幸村松 圭司大河原 眞 栗田 智子吉野 潔伏見 清秀松田 晋哉
著者情報
ジャーナル オープンアクセス HTML

2026 年 48 巻 3 号 p. 151-160

詳細
抄録

Early-stage endometrial cancer can be cured surgically using three techniques: laparotomy, laparoscopic surgery, and robotic-assisted surgery. In this retrospective study, we used 4 years of data from the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination to analyze perioperative sequelae for each surgical procedure. Patients with early-stage endometrial cancer were classified into three groups: laparotomy, laparoscopic surgery, and robotic-assisted surgery. The number of robotic-assisted surgeries is increasing, but hospitals with low surgical volumes performed laparotomy at a rate of 57.6%, while hospitals with higher surgical volume tended to perform fewer laparotomies and more laparoscopic and robotic-assisted surgeries. Compared with the laparotomy group, the in-hospital risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals for postoperative sequelae were 0.28 (0.18–0.44) and 0.39 (0.23–0.69) in the laparoscopic and robotic-assisted surgery groups, respectively (P = 0.001 for all). Regarding blood transfusion treatment, the incidence rate ratios were lower for laparoscopic and robotic-assisted surgery than for laparotomy (P < 0.001 for all), even after multivariable analysis. In conclusion, in early-stage endometrial cancer, laparotomy had the highest incidence of perioperative sequelae compared to laparoscopic surgery and robotic-assisted surgery.

著者関連情報
© 2026 産業医科大学

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons [Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International] license.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
前の記事 次の記事
feedback
Top