Journal of Veterinary Medical Science
Online ISSN : 1347-7439
Print ISSN : 0916-7250
ISSN-L : 0916-7250

この記事には本公開記事があります。本公開記事を参照してください。
引用する場合も本公開記事を引用してください。

Anesthesia with Isoflurane and Sevoflurane in Crested Serpent Eagle (Spilornis cheela hoya): Minimum Anesthetic Concentration, Physiological Effects, Hematocrit, Plasma Chemistry and Behavioral Effects
Fang-Tse CHANGeng-Ruei CHANGHsien-Chi WANGTien-Huan HSU
著者情報
ジャーナル フリー 早期公開

論文ID: 13-0161

この記事には本公開記事があります。
詳細
抄録
The initial goal of this study was to determine the minimum anesthetic concentration (MAC) for isoflurane (ISO) and sevoflurane (SEVO) for crested serpent eagle. Next we compared the anesthetic effects of each on the physiological effects, hematocrit, plasma chemistry values and behavior in spontaneously breathing captive adult crested serpent eagles. Sixteen Eagles were randomly allocated two groups for anesthesia with ISO (n=8) or SEVO (n=8). First, we measured the ISO or SEVO of MAC value, and four weeks later investigated the effect of each on the physiological effects, hematocrit (HCT) and plasma chemistry values. The MAC of ISO and SEVO for crested serpent eagles were 1.46 ± 0.30% and 2.03 ± 0.32%, respectively. The results revealed no significant differences between the two anesthetics in induction time, while time of extubation to recovery was significantly shorter with SEVO. Time-related increase of end-tidal CO2, decreases in body temperature and respiratory rates were observed during anesthesia with each anesthetic. There were no significant differences between the effect of the two anesthetics on heart rate, hematocrit, plasma chemistry values, or respiration although each caused minor respiratory depression. We concluded that SEVO is a more effective inhalant agent than ISO for use in eagles showing the most rapid induction and recovery from anesthesia.
著者関連情報
© 2013 by the Japanese Society of Veterinary Science

この記事はクリエイティブ・コモンズ [表示 - 非営利 - 改変禁止 4.0 国際]ライセンスの下に提供されています。
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.ja
feedback
Top