教育哲学研究
Online ISSN : 1884-1783
Print ISSN : 0387-3153
道徳教育における「規則のパラドクス」の射程
マクダウエルの治療的哲学観と実践的三段論法の捉え直し
杉田 浩崇
著者情報
ジャーナル フリー

2015 年 112 巻 p. 35-54

詳細
抄録
The purpose of this paper is to criticize the assumption about the relationship between mind and world in moral education by focusing on John McDowell’s reading of Wittgenstein’s rule-following considerations. Some researchers have taken moral formation as the gradual development of interdependent relationships between moral principles and particular cases. Nevertheless, they fail to show that one can, together with others, criticize her own perception of a moral fact or property in a particular situation because her perception may be captivated by the dichotomic picture of mind and world. In order to help these researchers break out of the dichotomic picture, I compare Saul Kripke’s reading of Wittgenstein’s rule-following considerations with McDowell’s. Both regard the concept of a community of rule-followers as a precondition for being able to follow rules. Kripke appeals to that concept to bridge an abysmal gap between mind and world, because he thinks the correctness of each person’s interpretation of a rule depends on its correspondence with that of other community members. By contrast, McDowell argues that we should reject the idea of the abysmal gap between mind and world. In a parallel way, McDowell takes the concept of a virtuous person as a precondition of appropriate moral actions, refusing an abysmal gap between evaluation and descriptive fact. A virtuous person’s action is caused by her perception of the salient features of a particular situation, which is accompanied by her conception of how to live. Her appreciation of the situation is an ideal one. As finite agents, we should try to see aspects of the world as she would see them. Finally, I provide a new perspective on Aristotle’s practical syllogism, according to which a perception of the salient features of a particular situation (minor premise) helps us to make sense of a moral principle (major premise) and an action (conclusion). This perspective enables us to understand how one can criticize her own perception without being dizzied by the abysmal gap between mind and world.
著者関連情報
© 2015 教育哲学会
前の記事 次の記事
feedback
Top