2023 Volume 64 Issue 3 Pages 101-108
Wood-rotting fungi are important components of woody plant ecosystems and play an active role in the decomposition and turnover of nutrients from wood, and are among the major groups of Basidiomycota. In this study, a new species of wood-rotting fungus, Sistotrema yunnanense, was proposed based on morphological characteristics and molecular evidence. It is characterized by resupinate basidiomata, a monomitic hyphal system having generative hyphae with clamp connections, suburniform to urniform basidia, and short-cylindrical to oblong ellipsoid basidiospores (4.5-6.5 × 3-4 µm). Phylogenetic analyses performed using the large subunit nuc rDNA indicated that S. yunnanense was nested within the genus Sistotrema s.l. of the family Hydnaceae, within the order Cantharellales.
In forest ecosystems, fungi play essential ecological roles by driving carbon cycling in forest soils, mediating mineral uptake by plants, and alleviating carbon limitations (Tedersoo et al., 2014). Wood-rotting fungi are a highly diverse cosmopolitan group that are associated with a range of plants growing in boreal, temperate, subtropical, and tropical regions (Gilbertson & Ryvarden, 1987; Núñez & Ryvarden, 2001; Bernicchia & Gorjón, 2010; Dai, 2012; Ryvarden & Melo, 2014; Dai et al., 2015; Wu et al., 2020; Dai et al., 2021). The wood-rotting fungal genus, Sistotrema Fr. (Hydnaceae, Cantharellales), typified by S. confluens Pers., is a comparatively large genus belonging to the phylum Basidiomycota, and is morphologically characterized by resupinate or pileate-stipitate, soft basidiomes, smooth, grandinioid, hydnoid, or poroid hymenophore with various characteristic textures (pellicular, membranaceous, or ceraceous), a monomitic hyphal system with oily inclusions, urniform basidia, and smooth, thin-walled, basidiospores containing cytoplasmic oil droplets (Eriksson, Hjortstam, & Ryvarden, 1984; Bernicchia & Gorjón, 2010). Based on the MycoBank database (http://www.mycobank.org, accessed Jun 20, 2022) and the Index Fungorum (http://www.indexfungorum.org, accessed Jun 20, 2022), the genus Sistotrema has 204 registered species and intraspecies names, however the actual number of the species is 60 (Eriksson et al., 1984; Bernicchia & Gorjón, 2010; Sugawara et al., 2022).
These pioneering phylogenetic studies reveal that the genus Sistotrema is highly polyphyletic (Nilsson, Larsson, Larsson, & Kõljalg, 2006; Larsson, 2007, Hibbett et al., 2014), and were conducted before the advent of molecular systematics (Kotiranta & Larsson, 2013; Cao, Hu, Yu, Wei, & Yuan, 2021; Sugawara et al., 2022). Kotiranta and Larsson (2013) conducted preliminary phylogenetic research on Sistotrema and proposed a new species, S. luteoviride Kotir. & K.H. Larss., which clustered with S. citriforme (M.P. Christ) K.H. Larss. & Hjortsam with high bootstrap support (98%), and was grouped together with S. pistilliferum Hauerslev, Membranomyces spurius (Bourdot) Jülich, and two Clavulina J. Schröt. species in a moderately supported clade (79%). The nuclear rDNA sequence analysis of the phylogenetic diversity of bulbil-forming lichenicolous fungi in Cantharellales by Lawrey et al. (2016) revealed that the type species, S. confluens, grouped closely with the genus Cantharellus Adans. ex Fr. A comprehensive phylogenetic analysis based on a multiple-marker dataset for the entire Hydnaceae sensu stricto indicated that Sistotrema along with its sister genus Hydnum L. forms a fully supported lineage that is closely related to the genera Craterellus Pers. and Cantharellus (Cao et al., 2021). Phylogenetic trees obtained using the fungal nuc rDNA ITS and LSU and rpb2 sequences showed that Sistotrema grouped with Hydnum; however, the generic boundary was unclear (Sugawara et al., 2022).
An undescribed fungal taxon was identified during investigations on wood-rotting fungi in southern China. The unknown taxon was placed in the genus Sistotrema based on analyses of the morphology and sequences of the large subunit (LSU) nuclear ribosomal RNA gene, and is proposed here as a new species, S. yunnanense.
The specimens studied were deposited at the herbarium of Southwest Forestry University (SWFC), Kunming, Yunnan Province, P.R. China. Macroscopic descriptions are based on field notes. Color terms followed Petersen (1996). All the materials were examined under a Nikon 80i microscope. Drawings were made with the aid of a drawing tube. The measurements and drawings were made from slide preparations stained with cotton blue (0.1 mg aniline blue dissolved in 60 g pure lactic acid), Melzer's reagent (1.5 g potassium iodide, 0.5 g crystalline iodine, 22 g chloral hydrate, aq. dest. 20) and 5% (5 g potassiumhydroxide, 100 mL water) potassiumhydroxide. Spores were measured from sections cut from the hymenial layer, in presenting spore size data, 5% of the measurements excluded from each end of the range are shown in parentheses, and spore measurements were made in Cotton Blue. The following abbreviations were used: KOH = 5% potassium hydroxide, CB = Cotton Blue, CB- = acyanophilous, IKI = Melzer's reagent, IKI- = both inamyloid and indextrinoid, L = mean spore length (arithmetic average for all spores), W = mean spore width (arithmetic average for all spores), Q = variation in the L/W ratios between the specimens studied, n (a/b) = number of spores (a) measured from given number (b) of specimens.
Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) rapid plant genome extraction kit-DN14 (Aidlab Biotechnologies Co., Ltd, Beijing) was used to obtain genomic DNA from dried specimens, according to the manufacturer's instructions with some modifications that a small piece of dried fungal specimen (about 30 mg) was ground to powder with liquid nitrogen. The powder was transferred to a 1.5 mL centrifuge tube, suspended in 0.4 mL of lysis buffer, and incubated at 65 °C in a water bath for 60 min. After that, 0.4 mL phenol-chloroform (24:1) was added to each tube and the suspension was shaken vigorously. After centrifugation at 13,000 rpm for 5 min, 0.3 mL of supernatant was transferred to a new tube and mixed with 0.45 mL of binding buffer. The mixture was then transferred to an adsorbing column (AC) for centrifugation at 13,000 rpm for 0.5 min. Then, 0.5 mL of inhibitor removal fluid was added in AC for a centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 0.5 min. After washing twice with 0.5 mL of washing buffer, the AC was transferred to a clean centrifuge tube, and 100 mL elution buffer was added to the middle of adsorbed film to elute the genome DNA. The nuc rDNA ITS region was amplified with primer pair ITS5 and ITS4 (White, Bruns, Lee, & Taylor, 1990). The nuc rDNA LSU region was amplified with primer pair LR0R and LR7 (Rehner & Samuels, 1994; Vilgalys & Hester, 1990). The PCR procedure for ITS was as follows: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles at 94 °C for 40 s, 58 °C for 45 s and 72 °C for 1 min, and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The PCR procedure for LSU marked as follows: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, followed by 35 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 48 °C 1 min and 72 °C for 1.5 min, and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The PCR products were purified and directly sequenced at Kunming Tsingke Biological Technology Limited Company. All newly generated sequences were deposited in GenBank (Table 1).
Species name | Sample no. | GenBank accession no. | References | |
ITS | LSU | |||
Bergerella atrofusca | Berger 34240 | MN902070 | Lawrey et al. (2020) | |
Botryobasidium candicans | GEL3083 | AJ406440 | unpublished | |
B. conspersum | KHL11063 | AY586657 | Larsson et al. (2004) | |
B. subcoronatum | FCUG1286 SWE | AY647212 | unpublished | |
Bryoclavula phycophila (Type) | TNS-F-79667 | LC508118 | Masumoto & Degawa (2020) | |
Burgella lutea | Etayo 27623 | KC336075 | Diederich et al. (2014) | |
Burgellopsis nivea (Type) | ATCC MYA-4209 | KC336077 | Diederich et al. (2014) | |
Burgoa verzuoliana (Type) | ATCC 24040 | DQ915475 | Lawrey et al. (2007) | |
Cantharellus alborufescens | JLS880b | KR677531 | Olariaga et al. (2015) | |
C. ambohitantelyi (type) | BB 08.336 | KF294656 | Buyck et al. (2014) | |
Ceratobasidium bulbillifaciens | CBS 129339 | KC336073 | Diederich et al. (2014) | |
Clavulina cristata | EL95_97 | AY586648 | Larsson et al. (2004) | |
C. livida | MCCNNU140159 | KT946799 | He et al. (2016) | |
Hydnum albidum | MB11-6024/2 | AY293186 | Binder et al. (2005) | |
H. crocidens | PERTH08095981 | KU612684 | Feng et al. (2016) | |
H. elatum | FRI62309 | KU612691 | Feng et al. (2016) | |
H. repandum | KHL 8552 | AF347095 | Larsson et al. (2004) | |
Membranomyces delectabile | KHL11147 | AY586688 | Larsson et al. (2004) | |
M. spurius | Hjm 19169 | KF218966 | Kotiranta & Larsson (2013) | |
Minimedusa obcoronata | F-082, 316 | AY004068 | Platas et al. (2001) | |
M. polyspora (Type) | ATCC 24041 | DQ915476 | Lawrey et al. (2007) | |
Multiclavula corynoides | Lutzoni 930804-2, DUKE | U66440 | Lutzoni (1997) | |
M. mucida | AFTOL-ID 1130 | AY885163 | unpublished | |
Neoburgoa freyi isolate | JL596-16 | KX423755 | Lawrey et al. (2016) | |
Platygloea disciformis | AFTOL-ID 710 | AY629314 | unpublished | |
Rogersiomyces malaysianus | LE-BIN 3507-10 | KU820986 | Psurtseva et al. (2016) | |
Sistotrema adnatum (Type) | FCUG 700 | DQ898699 | Moncalvo et al. (2006) | |
S. alboluteum | TAA167982 | AY586713 | Larsson et al. (2004) | |
S. alboluteum | TAA 180259 | AJ606042 | Nilsson et al. (2006) | |
S. alboluteum | MB6 | KX358055 | Stephenson et al. (2017) | |
S. albopallescens | KHL11070 | AM259210 | Nilsson et al. (2006) | |
S. athelioides (Type) | FCUG 701 | DQ898700 | Moncalvo et al. (2006) | |
S. biggsiae (Type) | FCUG 782 | DQ898697 | Moncalvo et al. (2006) | |
S. brinkmannii | FCUG 2198 | DQ898705 | Moncalvo et al. (2006) | |
S. brinkmannii | FCUG 2055 | DQ898706 | Moncalvo et al. (2006) | |
S. brinkmannii | FCUG 2217 | DQ898709 | Moncalvo et al. (2006) | |
S. brinkmannii | aurim1111 | JQ912675 | Menkis et al. (2006) | |
S. chloroporum | TUMH:64400 | LC642058 | Sugawara et al. (2022) | |
S. chloroporum | TUMH:64396 | LC642054 | Sugawara et al. (2022) | |
S. citriforme | KHL15898 | KF218962 | Kotiranta & Larsson (2013) | |
S. confluens | PV174 | AY586712 | Larsson et al. (2004) | |
S. confluens | FCUG 298 | DQ898711 | Moncalvo et al. (2006) | |
S. coroniferum | KH Larsson s.n. | KF218968 | Kotiranta & Larsson (2013) | |
S. coroniferum | Herbarium GB-BN-2 | AM259215 | Nilsson et al. (2006) | |
S. coronilla | NH7598 | AF506475 | Larsson et al. (2004) | |
S. coronilla | AFTOL-ID 618 | DQ457641 | Matheny et al. (2006) | |
S. farinaceum (Type) | FCUG 659 | DQ898707 | Moncalvo et al. (2006) | |
S. flavorhizomorphae | TUMH:64401 | LC642059 | Sugawara et al. (2022) | |
S. flavorhizomorphae | TUMH:64402 | LC642060 | Sugawara et al. (2022) | |
S. hypogaeum | CBS:393.63 | MH869925 | Vu et al. (2019) | |
S. hypogaeum (Type) | CBS:394.63 | MH869926 | Vu et al. (2019) | |
S. luteoviride (Type) | HK23176 | KF218963 | Kotiranta & Larsson (2013) | |
S. muscicola | KHL8791 | AF506474 | Larsson & Larsson (2003) | |
S. muscicola | KHL 11721 | AJ606040 | Nilsson et al. (2006) | |
S. oblongisporum | KHL 14077 | KF218970 | Kotiranta & Larsson (2013) | |
S. oblongisporum | KHL 11189 | GQ162819 | Kotiranta et al. (2011) | |
S. oblongisporum | GEL2125 | DQ898728 | Moncalvo et al. (2006) | |
S. oblongisporum | FCUG 1490 | DQ898702 | Moncalvo et al. (2006) | |
S. oblongisporum | KHL 14077 | KF218970 | Kotiranta & Larsson (2013) | |
S. octosporum | FCUG 2822 | DQ898698 | Moncalvo et al. (2006) | |
S. octosporum | CBS:126038 | MH875510 | Vu et al. (2019) | |
S. pistilliferum | EL 28/10 | KF218964 | Kotiranta & Larsson (2013) | |
S. raduloides | LR 44004 | KF218969 | Kotiranta & Larsson (2013) | |
S. raduloides | FCUG 1695 | DQ898710 | Moncalvo et al. (2006) | |
S. resinicystidium | FCUG 2188 | DQ898708 | Moncalvo et al. (2006) | |
S. sernanderi | CBS 926.70 | AF518650 | Hibbett & Binder (2002) | |
S. sernanderi | FCUG1049 SWE | AY647215 | unpublished | |
S. subconfluens | Dai 12578 | JX076811 | Zhou & Qin (2013) | |
S. subconfluens (Type) | Dai 12577 | JX076810 | Zhou & Qin (2013) | |
S. yunnanense | CLZhao 7341 (SWFC007341) | ON817192 | ON810360 | Present study |
S. yunnanense | CLZhao 7355 (SWFC007355) | ON817193 | ON810361 | Present study |
S. yunnanense | CLZhao 7395 (SWFC007395) | ON817195 | ON810363 | Present study |
S. yunnanense (Type) | CLZhao 7357 (SWFC007357) | ON817194 | ON810362 | Present study |
Sistotremella perpusilla | CBS:126048 | MH875516 | Vu et al. (2019) | |
Thanatephorus cucumeris | AG8 | AF354068 | Gonzalez et al. (2001) | |
T. theobromae | Sulawesi-10 | HQ424242 | Samuels et al. (2012) | |
Tilletiaria anomala | AFTOL-ID 865 | AY745715 | unpublished | |
Tulasnella cystidiophora | KW 2871 | AY585831 | Shefferson et al. (2005) | |
T. eremophila | 13062MD | KJ701189 | Crous et al. (2015) |
DNA sequences were aligned in MAFFT 7 (https://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/) using the “G-INS-I” strategy for LSU, and manually adjusted in BioEdit (Hall, 1999). Tilletiaria anomala Bandoni & B.N. Johri and Platygloea disciformis (Fr.) Neuhoff were selected as an outgroup for LSU analysis based on previous study (Sugawara et al., 2022) (Fig. 1). The sequence alignment was deposited in TreeBASE (submission ID 29714).
Maximum parsimony (MP) analyses were applied to the LSU dataset sequences. Approaches to phylogenetic analysis followed Zhao and Wu (2017), and the tree construction procedure was performed in PAUP* version 4.0b10 (Swofford, 2002). All characters were equally weighted and gaps were treated as missing data. Trees were inferred using the heuristic search option with TBR branch swapping and 1,000 random sequence additions. Max-trees were set to 5,000, branches of zero length were collapsed and all parsimonious trees were saved. Clade robustness was assessed using a bootstrap (BT) analysis with 1,000 replicates (Felsenstein, 1985). Descriptive tree statistics tree length (TL), consistency index (CI), retention index (RI), rescaled consistency index (RC), and homoplasy index (HI) were calculated for each MP tree generated. Datamatrix was also analyzed using Maximum Likelihood (ML) approach with RAxML-HPC2 through the Cipres Science Gateway (www.phylo.org; Miller et al., 2009). Branch support (BS) for ML analysis was determined by 1,000 bootstrap replicates.
MrModeltest 2.3 (Nylander, 2004) was used to determine the best-fit evolution model for each data set for Bayesian inference (BI). BI was calculated with MrBayes 3.1.2 with a general time reversible (GTR+I+G) model of DNA substitution and a gamma distribution rate variation across sites (Ronquist & Huelsenbeck, 2003). Four Markov chains were run for 2 runs from random starting trees for 640 thousand generations for LSU (Fig. 1), and trees were sampled every 100 generations. The first one-fourth generations were discarded as burn-in. A majority rule consensus tree of all remaining trees was calculated. Branches were considered as significantly supported if they received the maximum likelihood bootstrap (BS) >70%, the maximum parsimony bootstrap (BT) >50%, or Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP) >0.95.
The LSU dataset included sequences from 75 fungal specimens representing 59 taxa. The dataset had an aligned length of 1,622 characters in the dataset, of which 689 characters were constant, 463 were variable and parsimony-uninformative, and 470 were parsimony-informative. MP analysis yielded one equally parsimonious tree (TL = 2,903, CI = 0.471, HI = 0.528, RI = 0.611, RC = 0.288). The best model for LSU estimated and applied in Bayesian analysis had the following characteristics: GTR+I+G, lset nst = 6, rates = invgamma; prset statefreqpr = dirichlet (1,1,1,1). Bayesian analysis resulted in a similar topology with an average standard deviation of split frequencies (BI). The effective sample size (ESS) across the two runs was twice that of the average ESS (avg ESS) = 255. The phylogeny (Fig. 1) inferred from the LSU sequences showed that S. yunnanense nested in the family Hydnaceae.
Sistotrema yunnanense L.Q. Cai & C.L. Zhao, sp. nov. Figs. 2, 3.
MycoBank no.: MB 844701.
Holotype: CHINA, Yunnan Province, Chuxiong, Zixishan National Forestry Park, E 101°24′, N 25°0′, alt. 1,950 m, on fallen branch of angiosperm, 2 Jul 2018, CLZhao 7357 (SWFC 007357). GenBank: LSU = ON810362, ITS = ON817194.
Etymology: Yunnanense (Lat.): referring to the province name of the type locality.
Basidiomata annual, resupinate, farinaceous to pruinose when fresh, becoming membranaceous upon drying, up to 11 cm long and 2 cm wide, 100-200 µm thick. Hymenial surface smooth, white when fresh, turning to pale cream upon drying, cracking with age. Margin narrow, slightly cream, fragile. Hyphal system monomitic; generative hyphae with clamp connections, colorless, thin- to slight thick-walled, branched, 2.5-5 µm in diam, frequently with oily contents, IKI-, CB-, tissues unchanged in KOH. Cystidia and cystidioles absent. Basidia suburniform to urniform, thin-walled, with four sterigmata and a basal clamp connection, with oily contents, 13.5-24 × 2.5-5.5 µm; basidioles abundant, in shape similar to basidia, but slightly smaller. Basidiospores subcylindrical to oblong ellipsoid, colorless, thin-walled, smooth, with oily contents, IKI-, CB-, (4-)4.5-6.5(-7) × (2.5-)3-4(-4.5) µm, L = 5.45 µm, W = 3.67 µm, Q = 1.43-1.51 (n = 120/4).
Type of rot: White rot.
Additional specimens examined (paratypes): CHINA, Yunnan Province, Chuxiong, Zixishan Forestry Park, E 101°24′, N 25°0′, alt. 1,950 m, on fallen branch of angiosperm, 2 Jul 2018, CLZhao 7355 (SWFC 007355), CLZhao 7341 (SWFC 007341), CLZhao 7395 (SWFC 007395).
In this study, a new species, Sistotrema yunnanense was described based on phylogenetic analyses and morphological characteristics.
The nuc rDNA LSU analysis showed that S. yunnanense belongs to Hydnaceae (Fig. 1) but not to Sistotrema s.s. clade (Sugawara et al., 2022), i.e., mycorrhizal lineage.
Morphologically, Sistotrema brinkmannii (Bres.) J. Erikss. differs from S. yunnanense by its rough, white to whitish gray hymenial surface having small aculei, and smaller basidiospores (3.4-4.6 × 1.9-3.0 µm; Dhingra, Priyanka, & Singh, 2009).
Sistotrema yunnanense is similar to S. diademiferum (Bourdot & Galzin) Donk and S. porulosum Hallenb in having farinaceous to pruinose hymenophores. However, S. diademiferum differs from S. yunnanense by its brownish-gray hymenial surface, thin-walled generative hyphae, and ellipsoid to ovoid, smaller basidiospores (3-5 × 2-3 µm; Kaur, Kaur, Singh, & Dhingra, 2018); S. porulosum differs in its smooth to porulose hymenophore with the grayish-white hymenial surface, basidia with 6-8 sterigmata, and narrowly ellipsoid to allantoid, smaller basidiospores (4-5 × 1.9-2.4 µm; Kaur et al., 2018).
Sistotrema yunnanense is similar to S. confluens Pers. and S. subconfluens L.W. Zhou in having similar morphological characteristics, namely, subcylindrical to oblong ellipsoid basidiospores. However, S. confluens differs from S. yunnanense by having brittle, tomentose hymenophore with the whitish to cream hymenial surface and narrower basidiospores (5-6 × 2-3 µm; Piątek & Cabała, 2002); S. subconfluens differs from S. yunnanense by having pileate basidiomata with buff to cinnamon buff hymenial surface and smaller basidiospores (3.9-4.2 × 2-2.3 µm; Zhou & Qin, 2013). Both species belongs to other linage “Sistotrema s.s.”.
Wood-rotting fungi are an extensively studied group of Basidiomycota (Núñez & Ryvarden, 2001; Dai, 2012; Ryvarden & Melo, 2014; Dai et al., 2015; Wu et al., 2020; Cao et al., 2021; Luo, Chen, & Zhao, 2022; Qu, Wang, & Zhao, 2022); however, the diversity of wood-rotting fungi in East Asia is remains poorly understood, especially in subtropical and tropical regions. Recently, many described taxa in this ecological group were recorded from these areas (Dai, 2012; Chen, Korhonen, Li, & Dai, 2014; Bian & Dai, 2015; Cui et al., 2019; Shen et al., 2019; Zhu, Song, Zhou, Si, & Cui, 2019; Sugawara et al., 2022), and our newly described taxon increases the number of corticioid fungal species in East Asia.
The authors declare no conflict of interest. All the experiments undertaken in this study comply with the current laws of the People's Republic of China.
The research was supported by the the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 32170004, U2102220), Yunnan Fundamental Research Project (Grant No. 202001AS070043), the High-level Talents Program of Yunnan Province (YNQR-QNRC-2018-111), the Science Foundation of Education Department of Yunnan Province (2023Y0724), and the Research Project of Key Laboratory of Forest Disaster Warning and Control in Universities of Yunnan Province (ZKJS-S-202208).