AN EXPERIMENTAL TEST OF SIR IN MOTOR LEARNING
ジャーナル
フリー
1961 年 3 巻 2 号 p. 102-113
詳細
- Published: 1961 Received: 1961/06/20 Available on J-STAGE: 2009/02/24 Accepted: - Advance online publication: - Revised: -
-
訂正情報
訂正日: 2009/02/24 訂正理由: - 訂正箇所: 論文タイトル 訂正内容: Wrong : AN EXPERIMENTAL THEST OF SIR IN MOTOR LEARNING
Right : AN EXPERIMENTAL TEST OF SIR IN MOTOR LEARNING
訂正日: 2009/02/24 訂正理由: - 訂正箇所: 論文抄録 訂正内容: Wrong : The present study consisted of two parts.
Part I was composed of Experiment I (group M-M versus group D-M) and Ex-periment II (group M-D versus group D-D), Part II was composed of Experiments III and IV which are similar to Experi-ments I and II respectively, but the two parts were different in the post-rest training in that the time-limited method was used in Part I, while the work-limited method was employed in Part II. All four experi-ments employed the work-limited method in pre-rest training.
Ss were required to write inversed al-phabet letters as fast as they could. Each pair of groups were made homogeneous in respect to writing abilities as well as to sex. Each of the experiments consisted of 10 trials in pre-rest training, a 10 min rest and 15 trials in post-rest training. The results may be summarized as follows:
1. The spaced practice was more prof-itable than the massed practice in pre-rest training under the condition of the work-limited method employed both in Parts I and II.
2. The massed practice yielded a sig-nificant reminiscence, but the spaced practice did not.
3. Warm-up decrement appeared in two of the present four experiments and some theories concerning warm-up de-crement were described in connection with the present results.
4. An analysis of post-rest performance failed to show SIR in any of the experiments.
5. Previous studies on the massed practice with the time-limited method were criticized.
Thus the present results seem to support hypotheses I and III (B). Hypothesis I is: The learning level (SHR) in pre-rest training will be the same, although different in performance (SER), for DP and MP groups because the same number of re-sponses is allowed to both groups. If this is true, then the two groups will show identical learning curves, when they are tested under the same conditions after the rest. Hypothesis III (B) is: If there is no SIR in this case, their post-rest perform-ance curves will overlap and have the same trend without any difference.
訂正日: 2009/02/24 訂正理由: - 訂正箇所: 引用文献情報 訂正内容: Wrong : ADAMS, J. A. Warm-up decrement in performance on the pursuit rotor. Amer. 1. Psychol., 1952, 65, 404-414.
ADAMS, J. A., & REYNOLDS, B. Effect of shift in distribution of practice conditions following interpolated rest. 3. exp. Psychol., 1954, 47, 32-36.
AKITA, K. On the conditioned inhibition in human motor learning. ,lap. J. Psychol., 1956, 27, 94-104.
AMMONS, R. B. Acquisition of motor skill: I. Quantitative analysis and theoretical formula-tion. Psychol. Rev., 1947, 54, 263-281.
AMMONS, R. B. Effects of pre-practice activities on rotary pursuit performance. Y. exp. Psy-chol., 1951, 41, 187-191.
AMMONS, R. B., ALPIRIN, S. I., & AMMONS, C. H. Rotary pursuit performance as related to sex and adge of pre-adult subjects. J. exp. Psychol., 1955, 49, 127-133.
AMMONS, R. B., & WILLIO, L. Acquisition of motor skill: IV. Effects of repeated periods of massed practice. ,3. exp. Psychol., 1956, 51, 118-126.
ARCHER, E. J. Post-rest performance in motor learning as a function of pre-rest of distribution of practice. .7. exp. Psychol., 1954, 47, 47-51.
ARCHER, J., & BOURNE, L. E. Inverted-alphabet printing as a function of interval rest and sex. -7. exp. Psychol., 1956, 52, 322-328.
ARCHER, E.J. Effect of distribution of practice on a component skill of rotary pursuit tracking. -7. exp. Psychol., 1958, 56, 427-436.
BOURNE, L. E., & ARCHER, E.J. Time con-tinuously on target as a function of distribution of practice. ,J. exp. Psychol., 1956, 51, 25-33.
DENNY, M. R., FRISBEY, N., & WEAVER, J. W. Rotary pursuit performance under alternate conditions of distributed and massed practice. Y. exp. Psychol., 1955, 49, 48-54.
DICMAN, J. M. Growth of a motor skill of distribu-tion of practice. ,I. exp. Psychol., 1959, 57, 310-316.
DUNCAN, C. P. The effect of unequal amount of practice on motor learning before and after rest. Y. exp. Psychol., 1951, 42, 257-264.
JANKE, J. C., & DUNCAN, C. P. Reminiscence and forgetting in motor learning after extended rest intervals. -7. exp. Psychol., 1956, 52, 273-282.
KIMBLE, G. A. An experimental tests of two-factor theory of inhibition. 7. exp. Psychol., 1949, 39, 15-23.
KIMBLE, G. A. Performance and reminiscence in motor learning as a function of the degree of distribution of practice. ,7. exp. Psychol., 1949, 39, 500-510.
KIMBLE, G. A. Evidence for the role of motivation in determining the amount of reminiscence in pursuit rotor learning. 3. exp. Psychol., 1950, 40, 248-253.
MAEDA, S. Post-rest learning process in motor learning. Warming-up and reminiscence (II). Memoirs of the Osaka University of the Liberal Arts and Education, 1955, No. 4, 34-38.
MAEDA, S. Studies in motor learning: XII. A test of SIR by the work limited method. Paper summaries of the 21th annual meeting of JPA, 1957, 1, 102.
MAEDA, S., & TAKAKURA, T. The recent trend concerning SIR in motor learning and its critique. Y. exp. Psychol. Univer. of Tohoku, 1958, 2, 49-56.
MAEDA, S. Studies in motor learning: XIV. A test of SIR by the work limited method. Paper summaries of the 22nd annual meetings of the IPA, 1958, 2, 117-118.
MAEDA, S. A test of SIR in motor learning. Proc. the 24th ,7PA Meetings, 1960, p. 150.
PUBLOS, B. H. Reminiscence in motor learning as a function of prerest distribution of practice. J. exp. Psychol., 1960, 60, 155-161.
SCHUKER, R. E., STEVENS, L. B., & ELLIS, D. S. A test for conditioned inhibition in the alpha-bet-printing task. f. exp. Psychol., 1953, 46, 97-102.
SILVER, R. J. Effect of amount and distribution of warming-up activity or retention in motor learning. f. exp. Ps chol., 1952, 44, 88-95.
STARKWEATHER, J. A., & DUNCAN, C. P. A test for conditioned inhibition in motor learning. .7. exp. Psychol., 1954, 47, 351-356.
WASSERMAN, H. N. The effect of motivation and amount of pre-rest practice upon inhibition potential in motor learning. Y. exp. Psychol., 1951, 42, 162-172.
ZEAMAN, D., & KAUFMAN, H. Individual differ-ence and theory in motor learning task. Psychol. Monogr., 1958, 69, No. 6.
Right : ADAMS, J. A. Warm-up decrement in performance on the pursuit rotor. Amer. J. Psychol., 1952, 65, 404-414.
ADAMS, J. A., & REYNOLDS, B. Effect of shift in distribution of practice conditions following interpolated rest. J. exp. Psychol., 1954, 47, 32-36.
AKITA, K. On the conditioned inhibition in human motor learning., Jap. J. Psychol., 1956, 27, 94-104.
AMMONS, R. B. Acquisition of motor skill: I. Quantitative analysis and theoretical formulation. Psychol. Rev., 1947, 54, 263-281.
AMMONS, R. B. Effects of pre-practice activities on rotary pursuit performance. J. exp. Psychol., 1951, 41, 187-191.
AMMONS, R. B., ALPIRIN, S. I., & AMMONS, C. H. Rotary pursuit performance as related to sex and adge of pre-adult subjects. J. exp. Psychol., 1955, 49, 127-133.
AMMONS, R. B., & WILLIG, L. Acquisition of motor skill: IV. Effects of repeated periods of massed practice. J. exp. Psychol., 1956, 51, 118-126.
ARCHER, E. J. Post-rest performance in motor learning as a function of pre-rest of distribution of practice. J. exp. Psychol., 1954, 47, 47-51.
ARCHER, J., & BOURNE, L. E. Inverted-alphabet printing as a function of interval rest and sex. J. exp. Psychol., 1956, 52, 322-328.
ARCHER, E. J. Effect of distribution of practice on a component skill of rotary pursuit tracking. J. exp. Psychol., 1958, 56, 427-436.
BOURNE, L. E., & ARCHER, E. J. Time continuously on target as a function of distribution of practice. J. exp. Psychol., 1956, 51, 25-33.
DENNY, M. R., FRISBEY, N., & WEAVER, J. W. Rotary pursuit performance under alternate conditions of distributed and massed practice. J. exp. Psychol., 1955, 49, 48-54.
DICMAN, J. M. Growth of a motor skill of distribution of practice. J. exp. Psychol., 1959, 57, 310-316.
DUNCAN, C. P. The effect of unequal amount of practice on motor learning before and after rest. J. exp. Psychol., 1951, 42, 257-264.
JANKE, J. C., & DUNCAN, C. P. Reminiscence and forgetting in motor learning after extended rest intervals. J. exp. Psychol., 1956, 52, 273-282.
KIMBLE, G. A. An experimental tests of twofactor theory of inhibition. J. exp. Psychol., 1949, 39, 15-23.
KIMBLE, G. A. Performance and reminiscence in motor learning as a function of the degree of distribution of practice. J. exp. Psychol., 1949, 39, 500-510.
KIMBLE, G. A. Evidence for the role of motivation in determining the amount of reminiscence in pursuit rotor learning. J. exp. Psychol., 1950, 40, 248-253.
MAEDA, S. Post-rest learning process in motor learning. Warming-up and reminiscence (II). Memoirs of the Osaka University of the Liberal Arts and Education, 1955, No.4, 34-38.
MAEDA, S. Studies in motor learning: XII. A test of SIR by the work limited method. Paper summaries of the 21th annual meeting of JPA, 1957, 1, 102.
MAEDA, S., & TAKAKURA, T. The recent trend concerning SIR in motor learning and its critique. J. exp. Psychol. Univer. of Tohoku, 1958, 2, 49-56.
MAEDA, S. Studies in motor learning: XIV. A test of SIR by the work limited method. Paper summaries of the 22nd annual meetings of the JPA, 1958, 2, 117-118.
MAEDA, S. A test of SIR in motor learning. Proc. the 24th, JPA Meetings, 1960, p.150.
PUBLOS, B. H. Reminiscence in motor learning as a function of prerest distribution of practice. J. exp. Psychol., 1960, 60, 155-161.
SCHUKER, R. E., STEVENS, L. B., & ELLIS, D. S. A test for conditioned inhibition in the alphabet-printing task. J. exp. Psychol., 1953, 46, 97-102.
SILVER, R. J. Effect of amount and distribution of warming-up activity or retention in motor learning. J. exp. Psychol., 1952, 44, 88-95.
STARKWEATHER, J. A., & DUNCAN, C. P. A test for conditioned inhibition in motor learning. J. exp. Psychol., 1954, 47, 351-356.
WASSERMAN, H. N. The effect of motivation and amount of pre-rest practice upon inhibition potential in motor learning. J. exp. Psychol., 1951, 42, 162-172.
ZEAMAN, D., & KAUFMAN, H. Individual difference and theory in motor learning task. Psychol. Monogr., 1958, 69, No.6.
訂正日: 2009/02/24 訂正理由: - 訂正箇所: PDFファイル 訂正内容: -
訂正日: 2009/02/24 訂正理由: - 訂正箇所: 引用文献情報 訂正内容: Wrong : ADAMS, J. A. Warm-up decrement in performance on the pursuit rotor. Amer. J. Psychol., 1952, 65, 404-414.
ADAMS, J. A., & REYNOLDS, B. Effect of shift in distribution of practice conditions following interpolated rest. J. exp. Psychol., 1954, 47, 32-36.
AKITA, K. On the conditioned inhibition in human motor learning., Jap. J. Psychol., 1956, 27, 94-104.
AMMONS, R. B. Acquisition of motor skill: I. Quantitative analysis and theoretical formulation. Psychol. Rev., 1947, 54, 263-281.
AMMONS, R. B. Effects of pre-practice activities on rotary pursuit performance. J. exp. Psychol., 1951, 41, 187-191.
AMMONS, R. B., ALPIRIN, S. I., & AMMONS, C. H. Rotary pursuit performance as related to sex and adge of pre-adult subjects. J. exp. Psychol., 1955, 49, 127-133.
AMMONS, R. B., & WILLIG, L. Acquisition of motor skill: IV. Effects of repeated periods of massed practice. J. exp. Psychol., 1956, 51, 118-126.
ARCHER, E. J. Post-rest performance in motor learning as a function of pre-rest of distribution of practice. J. exp. Psychol., 1954, 47, 47-51.
ARCHER, J., & BOURNE, L. E. Inverted-alphabet printing as a function of interval rest and sex. J. exp. Psychol., 1956, 52, 322-328.
ARCHER, E. J. Effect of distribution of practice on a component skill of rotary pursuit tracking. J. exp. Psychol., 1958, 56, 427-436.
BOURNE, L. E., & ARCHER, E. J. Time continuously on target as a function of distribution of practice. J. exp. Psychol., 1956, 51, 25-33.
DENNY, M. R., FRISBEY, N., & WEAVER, J. W. Rotary pursuit performance under alternate conditions of distributed and massed practice. J. exp. Psychol., 1955, 49, 48-54.
DICMAN, J. M. Growth of a motor skill of distribution of practice. J. exp. Psychol., 1959, 57, 310-316.
DUNCAN, C. P. The effect of unequal amount of practice on motor learning before and after rest. J. exp. Psychol., 1951, 42, 257-264.
JANKE, J. C., & DUNCAN, C. P. Reminiscence and forgetting in motor learning after extended rest intervals. J. exp. Psychol., 1956, 52, 273-282.
KIMBLE, G. A. An experimental tests of twofactor theory of inhibition. J. exp. Psychol., 1949, 39, 15-23.
KIMBLE, G. A. Performance and reminiscence in motor learning as a function of the degree of distribution of practice. J. exp. Psychol., 1949, 39, 500-510.
KIMBLE, G. A. Evidence for the role of motivation in determining the amount of reminiscence in pursuit rotor learning. J. exp. Psychol., 1950, 40, 248-253.
MAEDA, S. Post-rest learning process in motor learning. Warming-up and reminiscence (II). Memoirs of the Osaka University of the Liberal Arts and Education, 1955, No.4, 34-38.
MAEDA, S. Studies in motor learning: XII. A test of SIR by the work limited method. Paper summaries of the 21th annual meeting of JPA, 1957, 1, 102.
MAEDA, S., & TAKAKURA, T. The recent trend concerning SIR in motor learning and its critique. J. exp. Psychol. Univer. of Tohoku, 1958, 2, 49-56.
MAEDA, S. Studies in motor learning: XIV. A test of SIR by the work limited method. Paper summaries of the 22nd annual meetings of the JPA, 1958, 2, 117-118.
MAEDA, S. A test of SIR in motor learning. Proc. the 24th, JPA Meetings, 1960, p.150.
PUBLOS, B. H. Reminiscence in motor learning as a function of prerest distribution of practice. J. exp. Psychol., 1960, 60, 155-161.
SCHUKER, R. E., STEVENS, L. B., & ELLIS, D. S. A test for conditioned inhibition in the alphabet-printing task. J. exp. Psychol., 1953, 46, 97-102.
SILVER, R. J. Effect of amount and distribution of warming-up activity or retention in motor learning. J. exp. Psychol., 1952, 44, 88-95.
STARKWEATHER, J. A., & DUNCAN, C. P. A test for conditioned inhibition in motor learning. J. exp. Psychol., 1954, 47, 351-356.
WASSERMAN, H. N. The effect of motivation and amount of pre-rest practice upon inhibition potential in motor learning. J. exp. Psychol., 1951, 42, 162-172.
ZEAMAN, D., & KAUFMAN, H. Individual difference and theory in motor learning task. Psychol. Monogr., 1958, 69, No.6.
Right : ADAMS, J. A. Warm-up decrement in performance on the pursuit rotor. Amer. J. Psychol., 1952, 65, 404-414.
ADAMS, J. A., & REYNOLDS, B. Effect of shift in distribution of practice conditions following interpolated rest. J. exp. Psychol., 1954, 47, 32-36.
AKITA, K. On the conditioned inhibition in human motor learning., Jap. J. Psychol., 1956, 27, 94-104.
AMMONS, R. B. Acquisition of motor skill: I. Quantitative analysis and theoretical formulation. Psychol. Rev., 1947, 54, 263-281.
AMMONS, R. B. Effects of pre-practice activities on rotary pursuit performance. J. exp. Psychol., 1951, 41, 187-191.
AMMONS, R. B., ALPIRIN, S. I., & AMMONS, C. H. Rotary pursuit performance as related to sex and adge of pre-adult subjects. J. exp. Psychol., 1955, 49, 127-133.
AMMONS, R. B., & WILLIG, L. Acquisition of motor skill: IV. Effects of repeated periods of massed practice. J. exp. Psychol., 1956, 51, 118-126.
ARCHER, E. J. Post-rest performance in motor learning as a function of pre-rest of distribution of practice. J. exp. Psychol., 1954, 47, 47-51.
ARCHER, J., & BOURNE, L. E. Inverted-alphabet printing as a function of interval rest and sex. J. exp. Psychol., 1956, 52, 322-328.
ARCHER, E. J. Effect of distribution of practice on a component skill of rotary pursuit tracking. J. exp. Psychol., 1958, 56, 427-436.
BOURNE, L. E., & ARCHER, E. J. Time continuously on target as a function of distribution of practice. J. exp. Psychol., 1956, 51, 25-33.
DENNY, M. R., FRISBEY, N., & WEAVER, J. W. Rotary pursuit performance under alternate conditions of distributed and massed practice. J. exp. Psychol., 1955, 49, 48-54.
DICMAN, J. M. Growth of a motor skill of distribution of practice. J. exp. Psychol., 1959, 57, 310-316.
DUNCAN, C. P. The effect of unequal amount of practice on motor learning before and after rest. J. exp. Psychol., 1951, 42, 257-264.
JANKE, J. C., & DUNCAN, C. P. Reminiscence and forgetting in motor learning after extended rest intervals. J. exp. Psychol., 1956, 52, 273-282.
KIMBLE, G. A. An experimental tests of twofactor theory of inhibition. J. exp. Psychol., 1949, 39, 15-23.
KIMBLE, G. A. Performance and reminiscence in motor learning as a function of the degree of distribution of practice. J. exp. Psychol., 1949, 39, 500-510.
KIMBLE, G. A. Evidence for the role of motivation in determining the amount of reminiscence in pursuit rotor learning. J. exp. Psychol., 1950, 40, 248-253.
MAEDA, S. Post-rest learning process in motor learning. Warming-up and reminiscence (II). Memoirs of the Osaka University of the Liberal Arts and Education, 1955, No.4, 34-38.
MAEDA, S. Studies in motor learning: XII. A test of SIR by the work limited method. Paper summaries of the 21th annual meeting of JPA, 1957, 1, 102.
MAEDA, S., & TAKAKURA, T., The recent trend concerning SIR in motor learning and its critique. J. exp. Psychol. Univer. of Tohoku, 1958, 2, 49-56.
MAEDA, S. Studies in motor learning: XIV. A test of SIR by the work limited method. Paper summaries of the 22nd annual meetings of the JPA, 1958, 2, 117-118.
MAEDA, S. A test of SIR in motor learning. Proc. the 24th, JPA Meetings, 1960, p.150.
PUBLOS, B. H. Reminiscence in motor learning as a function of prerest distribution of practice. J. exp. Psychol., 1960, 60, 155-161.
SCHUKER, R. E., STEVENS, L. B., & ELLIS, D. S. A test for conditioned inhibition in the alphabet-printing task. J. exp. Psychol., 1953, 46, 97-102.
SILVER, R. J. Effect of amount and distribution of warming-up activity or retention in motor learning. J. exp. Psychol., 1952, 44, 88-95.
STARKWEATHER, J. A., & DUNCAN, C. P. A test for conditioned inhibition in motor learning. J. exp. Psychol., 1954, 47, 351-356.
WASSERMAN, H. N. The effect of motivation and amount of pre-rest practice upon inhibition potential in motor learning. J. exp. Psychol., 1951, 42, 162-172.
ZEAMAN, D., & KAUFMAN, H. Individual difference and theory in motor learning task. Psychol. Monogr., 1958, 69, No.6.
PDFをダウンロード (862K)
メタデータをダウンロード
RIS形式
BIB TEX形式
テキスト
メタデータのダウンロード方法
発行機関連絡先
(EndNote、Reference Manager、ProCite、RefWorksとの互換性あり)
(BibDesk、LaTeXとの互換性あり)
記事の1ページ目
