ソシオロジ
Online ISSN : 2188-9406
Print ISSN : 0584-1380
ISSN-L : 0584-1380
論文
自己解体的な自己意識の社会学的な考察とその問題
辻潤の言説を手がかりとして
鍵本 優
著者情報
ジャーナル フリー

2009 年 53 巻 3 号 p. 3-19,178

詳細
抄録
 The purpose of this paper is to reconsider sociologically the problem of disidentification in social identity studies. In this paper, this reconsideration is made from the perspective of self-consciousness toward self-dissolution (that is, to dissolve one’s own self). The social discourses that express this self-consciousness toward self-dissolution are called “discourses in self-dissolution.” In this paper, after presenting the general psychological and sociological arguments with regard to self-consciousness, the discourses in the writings of the Japanese Dadaist writer Tsuji Jun (1884-1944) are discussed from a sociological perspective. One type of self-consciousness toward self-dissolution is shown based on sociological considerations, and the problem of discussing self-consciousness toward self-dissolution is illustrated as well. In Section 1 of this paper, the point at issue is set up for addressing self-consciousness toward self-dissolution. In Section 2, the theoretical frame of reference for self-dissolution is discussed by reconsidering psychological and sociological arguments with regard to self-consciousness. In Section 3, the discourses regarding self-dissolution in Tsuji’s text are displayed concretely, and the structure of his thought is examined. The singularity of his self-consciousness toward self-dissolution is also considered. That singularity is examined from the perspective of the theoretical framework, and a type of the self-consciousness toward self-dissolution is considered. Finally, in Section 4, the relation between the subject and the transcendental on self-consciousness toward self-dissolution is shown. This paper offers the following conclusions. First, the sociological consideration of self-dissolution can be executed on the axis of the integration/dissolution of the identity. Second, it can be developed more precisely by arguing the relations of linkage and reaction of an integrative intention and a transcendental intention regarding the self. Third, there is a need for further discussion of the relation between the subject and the transcendental.
著者関連情報
© 2009 社会学研究会
次の記事
feedback
Top